Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
wtj_wargames
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1919 - 1948 of 2093   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1919
Wow, the Connecticuts have a higher heavy rating than the Nelsons! So it appears I went about things in the completely opposite- and wrong- direction. I was...
vpraze2000
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2008
11:13 am
1920
I'd like to know how many Republique players ever use the Attack command? As I've been reviewing the command text and begun outlining options for attacking...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2008
2:47 am
1921
Hi Jim! As far as I can remember I don't think that we have used the Attack order even once. Normally you attack terrain features which is handled by the Move...
Rick Scherstein
ricschus
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
1:58 pm
1922
Jim, I use the ATTACK order regularly and I'll explain. I view MOVE as an order issued when enemy contact is not anticipated. If the division is stopped short...
Jon Freitag
jfreitag2829
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
9:41 pm
1923
Hi Jon, Thanks for the info. In the rules, a division under Move orders does not revert to Defend if it comes within contact range of an enemy. Is this your...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 5, 2008
3:11 am
1924
Hi Rick, The only thing I ever considered using the Attack order for was pursuit, which it does lend itself to. I think currently the items I have slated for...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 5, 2008
3:26 am
1925
Jim, Approximatley when is the next release of new ships due and I happened to notice that some ships that I had previosly ordered for you such as the Uss...
John Lord
marshalljhn
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2008
8:46 pm
1926
I have a restock order in with the foundry for Oregon and most of the other ships on the Out of Stock list (posted at Game Shop 1 under Ordering Details)....
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 9, 2008
5:58 am
1927
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the wtj_wargames group: What types of ships would you like to see added to the WTJ Naval line of 1/3000...
wtj_wargames@yahoogro...
Send Email
Sep 17, 2008
2:39 am
1928
I want to make a plug for later ships. WHats available for WW1 is really poor when compared to our WTJ ships. I would love to see a WW1 range of such quality. ...
dennansnz
Online Now Send Email
Sep 17, 2008
6:59 am
1929
I voted for the older ironclads and the dutch and scandinavian navy. The ironclads because most of them were still in use during the period covered by wtj...
yuber_i
Offline Send Email
Sep 17, 2008
9:19 am
1930
I too voted for the older vessels, I just love those turret ships and broadside ironclads. I also voted for the later pre-dreads, so I guess I went with both ...
vpraze2000
Offline Send Email
Sep 17, 2008
8:32 pm
1931
Just going to build Russian 1st Pacific Squadron for RJW and so looking for ships to complete it. WTJ ships are excellent but the following are missed: ...
melekhsalem
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2008
12:59 am
1932
The Rossia and Aurora are only out of stock right now (they are usually available) and I have a restock order in with the foundry right now. Unfortuantely the...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2008
5:33 am
1933
Hi there Jim, just a thought, but if you were to do earlier period pre-dreads, (more sort of ironclads - 1860's - 1880's) would you consider changing scale? ...
Doug Melville
dmelville64
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
12:12 am
1934
I would advise against such a thing. To m, the main appeal of the old ironclads would be to use the ones which were still afloat during the predreadnaught...
Al Jul
yuber_i
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
9:38 am
1935
I would second the vote to stay with 1/3000 scale. I understand Doug´s point on size (and as I get older those ships are harder and harder to see!), but I too...
Patrick Phillips
vpraze2000
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
6:41 pm
1936
I agree with both points regarding scale. So: what about two? Would a 1/3000 and, say, a 1/1200 be feasible? Two scales ideal for two different jobs. Just a...
Richard Wimpenny
richard_wimp...
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
7:03 pm
1937
If you want 1/1200 Ironclads North Head Miniatures already make them ... From: Richard Wimpenny <richard_wimpenny@...> Subject: Re: [wtj_wargames] Re:...
Simon Dennan
dennansnz
Online Now Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
10:56 pm
1938
I can see both points of view, and i have 1/3000 German and French fleets that could co-exist with earlier ships, but i just can't imagine trying to rig (very...
Doug Melville
dmelville64
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
11:36 pm
1939
Well, i own a Navwar Arcona with full sails (they were made as metal pieces). Although a bit out of scale (as most Navwar items), it looks great. So if Navwar...
Al Jul
yuber_i
Offline Send Email
Sep 24, 2008
11:26 am
1940
North Head Miniatures, you say? Thanks, I'll look them up. It's a period I haven't done yet, but it won't be long, I feel! ... From: Simon Dennan...
Richard Wimpenny
richard_wimp...
Offline Send Email
Sep 24, 2008
5:28 pm
1941
I have posted a photo in the WTJ Naval folder of the Photos section, showing the masters for the next release of predreadnoughts. The final list of ships for...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
4:13 am
1942
Hi Jim, great looking ships! It is a nice selection, especially with the smaller navies. But I think that I am  looking forward most to Polyphemus and the new...
Patrick Phillips
vpraze2000
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
6:29 pm
1943
One good detail to keep in mind is that Polyphemus was originally designed to engage ships which had very light secondary armaments. Any capital ships built...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
4:43 pm
1944
I checked the armor ratings for Rossia in Quickfire and they still checked out okay. So I got out the old reference books and went over the original values in...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
6:07 pm
1945
I didn´t know about the floating bridge, nice idea. Kind of makes you wonder if the designer really had faith in his creation though. As for her use in gaming...
Patrick Phillips
vpraze2000
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
6:42 pm
1946
Hi, Not been around for a while. Cn anyone tell me the status of 5.0? Cheers Rodge...
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Nov 4, 2008
4:18 pm
1947
Hi Roger, Currently the new assault table is being tested, it is similar to the old one except it has a wider variety of results. Once the results for that...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Nov 8, 2008
6:01 pm
1948
... the ... for ... 5.0 ... on ... rules to ... Thanks Jim. I'll go with 5.0. I've trawled the old messages to look at base sizes; I'm (still) based for GdB...
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Nov 9, 2008
8:34 am
Messages 1919 - 1948 of 2093   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help