Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
wtj_wargames
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1907 - 1936 of 2093   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1907
Added a new series of photos of our most recent ww-1 game, when 12 British tanks in vain attacked the German line and got immobilised in craters & mud, broke...
Erwin Muilwijk
erwinmk
Offline Send Email
Aug 20, 2008
12:54 pm
1908
Really beautiful! Are they 1/72 plastic miniatures? Did you enjoy the game? Did the german tank do something during the game? Next time you play try to make a...
yuber_i
Offline Send Email
Aug 21, 2008
10:54 am
1909
The Germans are clearly Emhar and Revell plastic 1/72 figures. I never saw the British close enough to say one way or the other. Thanks, John...
johnleahy55
Offline Send Email
Aug 23, 2008
5:54 am
1910
Soft Cover Modifiers: I see no fire modifiers for soft cover on the QRS. Is this intentional?...
Jon Freitag
jfreitag2829
Offline Send Email
Aug 29, 2008
12:54 pm
1911
Hi Patrick, sorry for not responding earlier, I didn't previously see the question about the formula. There is a formula page at the end of the ship values...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Aug 29, 2008
2:56 pm
1912
Do you mean for direct artillery fire? If so, then yes that is intentional as the soft cover doesn't qualify for cover protection against that type of direct...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Aug 30, 2008
3:21 am
1913
Jim, No, I was referring to small arms fire. I see (-1) for Solid Cover and (-2) for Hard Cover but nothing for Soft cover. ... the...
Jon Freitag
jfreitag2829
Offline Send Email
Aug 30, 2008
4:40 am
1914
The same applies for the 1916 rule set. Soft cover does not give you any protection against either small arms fire or direct artillery fire. Instead soft cover...
Erwin Muilwijk
erwinmk
Offline Send Email
Aug 30, 2008
9:28 am
1915
Hi Jim, no problem with the response time, I just figured no one knew the answer. Anyway, I compared the main and heavy secondary armament of the Nelsons with...
Patrick Phillips
vpraze2000
Offline Send Email
Aug 30, 2008
5:17 pm
1916
Thanks Erwin and Jim for answering my question. Jon ... arms ... Cover ... <JonFreitag@>...
Jon Freitag
jfreitag2829
Offline Send Email
Aug 31, 2008
2:27 am
1917
Nelson's heavy rating - if only applying her true mains - would still be a 10-5. The new 12" guns were better, but not better enough (!) to rate an 11-5. I...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Aug 31, 2008
6:17 pm
1918
Close, for Connecticut the heavy rating would be an 11-5 (meaning 11 for gunnery and 5 for ROF). Jim ... 7. Do you think these ratings are too high? I wish I...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Aug 31, 2008
6:31 pm
1919
Wow, the Connecticuts have a higher heavy rating than the Nelsons! So it appears I went about things in the completely opposite- and wrong- direction. I was...
vpraze2000
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2008
11:13 am
1920
I'd like to know how many Republique players ever use the Attack command? As I've been reviewing the command text and begun outlining options for attacking...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2008
2:47 am
1921
Hi Jim! As far as I can remember I don't think that we have used the Attack order even once. Normally you attack terrain features which is handled by the Move...
Rick Scherstein
ricschus
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
1:58 pm
1922
Jim, I use the ATTACK order regularly and I'll explain. I view MOVE as an order issued when enemy contact is not anticipated. If the division is stopped short...
Jon Freitag
jfreitag2829
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
9:41 pm
1923
Hi Jon, Thanks for the info. In the rules, a division under Move orders does not revert to Defend if it comes within contact range of an enemy. Is this your...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 5, 2008
3:11 am
1924
Hi Rick, The only thing I ever considered using the Attack order for was pursuit, which it does lend itself to. I think currently the items I have slated for...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 5, 2008
3:26 am
1925
Jim, Approximatley when is the next release of new ships due and I happened to notice that some ships that I had previosly ordered for you such as the Uss...
John Lord
marshalljhn
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2008
8:46 pm
1926
I have a restock order in with the foundry for Oregon and most of the other ships on the Out of Stock list (posted at Game Shop 1 under Ordering Details)....
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 9, 2008
5:58 am
1927
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the wtj_wargames group: What types of ships would you like to see added to the WTJ Naval line of 1/3000...
wtj_wargames@yahoogro...
Send Email
Sep 17, 2008
2:39 am
1928
I want to make a plug for later ships. WHats available for WW1 is really poor when compared to our WTJ ships. I would love to see a WW1 range of such quality. ...
dennansnz
Offline Send Email
Sep 17, 2008
6:59 am
1929
I voted for the older ironclads and the dutch and scandinavian navy. The ironclads because most of them were still in use during the period covered by wtj...
yuber_i
Offline Send Email
Sep 17, 2008
9:19 am
1930
I too voted for the older vessels, I just love those turret ships and broadside ironclads. I also voted for the later pre-dreads, so I guess I went with both ...
vpraze2000
Offline Send Email
Sep 17, 2008
8:32 pm
1931
Just going to build Russian 1st Pacific Squadron for RJW and so looking for ships to complete it. WTJ ships are excellent but the following are missed: ...
melekhsalem
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2008
12:59 am
1932
The Rossia and Aurora are only out of stock right now (they are usually available) and I have a restock order in with the foundry right now. Unfortuantely the...
Jim B.
wtjcom
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2008
5:33 am
1933
Hi there Jim, just a thought, but if you were to do earlier period pre-dreads, (more sort of ironclads - 1860's - 1880's) would you consider changing scale? ...
Doug Melville
dmelville64
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
12:12 am
1934
I would advise against such a thing. To m, the main appeal of the old ironclads would be to use the ones which were still afloat during the predreadnaught...
Al Jul
yuber_i
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
9:38 am
1935
I would second the vote to stay with 1/3000 scale. I understand Doug´s point on size (and as I get older those ships are harder and harder to see!), but I too...
Patrick Phillips
vpraze2000
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
6:41 pm
1936
I agree with both points regarding scale. So: what about two? Would a 1/3000 and, say, a 1/1200 be feasible? Two scales ideal for two different jobs. Just a...
Richard Wimpenny
richard_wimp...
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2008
7:03 pm
Messages 1907 - 1936 of 2093   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help