Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
wifdiscussion · List for the World in Flames game
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 93625 - 93654 of 105505   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
93625
Bill is 101% right ! ... as 2) in clear weather, rail supply (the last one only, back to a primary supply source) may include rail (and sea, for 1 hex cost)...
paulderynck
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2007
1:13 pm
93626
My apologies if this has been asked before, but can the Allied player place Polish partisans in the Eastern (Soviet controlled) portion of Poland (prior to...
John Hammond
churchill_tr
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2007
8:53 pm
93627
You place partisans in enemy controlled hexes. ... -- ... Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that....
Bob Andriola
realdoctormm
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2007
9:06 pm
93628
Yes, but that really doesn't answer my question. Is the USSR an enemy of Polish partisans? ... player ... of ... are stupider than that....
John Hammond
churchill_tr
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2007
9:39 pm
93629
This question is part of the questions that we have for Harry Rowland (for clarifying MWiF). It was submitted to him 3 days ago (with 47 others), I'm still...
Patrice Forno
froonp
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2007
9:42 pm
93630
That's not the question that was asked. "Can the allied player place partisans in Soviet controlled hexes in East Poland" The answer is no, with no room for...
Bob Andriola
realdoctormm
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2007
10:13 pm
93631
I could be convinced to support some simplification of cooperation rules but again, I think it should be done very carefully if at all, not just with a...
Wendell
wifwendell
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2007
11:31 pm
93632
This is certainly better than just getting rid of all cooperation rules, although I'm not sure I really WANT to get rid of current cooperation rules. Again, I...
Wendell
wifwendell
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2007
11:42 pm
93633
Lane's major objection seems to be transporting offbeat corps by sea on minor TRS (Like TERR on the Dutch TRS). Since ships already can cooperate ("stack" if...
morganconrad
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
4:56 am
93634
Certainly the MP issues need to be kept. It's the minor country issues that IMO are not worth the bother. Yes RUM and HUN didn't like each other. Is that...
lbinflorida42
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
5:03 am
93635
Isn't the SA Terr a major power unit? South African, Indian, N. Irish, Canadian, Australian, New Zealand TERRs I understood counted as MP units, no different...
Mike Ensele
ncromcr
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
6:12 am
93636
There is a lengthy debate on this starting with message #89792. The answer could be yes or no right now depending on how the persuasiveness of the opinions...
paulderynck
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
6:51 am
93637
This is true, its the Rhodesian, Ugandan, etc. territorials the Dutch TRS can't transport - until the Dutch are completely conquered - then you're fine -...
paulderynck
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
7:04 am
93638
Rich, your interpretation is quite incorrect I think. First, being an enemy and being on the other side are not identical concepts. They are defined in the RAW...
paulderynck
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
7:45 am
93639
As a avid reader of Polish History, and being sensitive to political nuance concerning poland I would say that the partisan is anti german essentially, polish...
jason franzen
edrahil_jf
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
12:30 pm
93640
Yes. Territorials are not 'special' in any way with respect to whether they are minor/major country units. You take a look at what type of unit it is (SA /...
kenzclark
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
3:02 pm
93641
IMO the trouble is not with MP countries and the cooperation works well and is historic. No one that I know has advocated the change of cooperation and MP...
tom bell
Tom_S_Bell
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
4:17 pm
93642
In this case "HR" I think means ruled by Harry Rowland and not "House Rule". Kind of humorous that that coincidental misunderstanding can exist. :) ... well...
paulderynck
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
6:31 pm
93643
I did not see the definition of enemy in the glossary before and I cannot find the rule I was looking at before maybe I was looking at an older version. So I...
RG1066@...
rgause1066
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
6:56 pm
93644
Hi ! A question has come up in our DoD3-Wiffe game in Sweden. The neutral (after a conditional Chinese surrender) Japanese player argues that since US...
spenser2u
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
8:34 pm
93645
One suggestion for any change would be to erase the stacking prohibition from the cooperation rules, but add a +2 modifier in land combat against a hex...
Brian
jackstraw723
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
8:43 pm
93646
We've tried making partisans in a USSR controlled Eastern Poland via House Rules. And even after seeing them on the map while Russia was off having adventures...
Brian
jackstraw723
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
8:58 pm
93647
This was a long discussion, recently, and I believe no dispute was found which prevents the Allies from putting partisans in East Poland(Russian controlled)...
popo1@...
bill_popovich
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
9:05 pm
93648
We often send the Brazilians to secondary fronts to fill the line against the Axis, sometimes Italy, more often the Balkans or Spain. THey serve their...
popo1@...
bill_popovich
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
9:25 pm
93649
Enemy [a major power or minor country you are at war with] From the glossary in the back of the Aug 04 rules. Bill P ... From: RG1066@... Date: Monday,...
popo1@...
bill_popovich
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
9:30 pm
93650
If that's the case, nobody bothered consulting the rules. The controlling MP (in this case, the CW) places the partisans, and places them in enemy controlled...
Bob Andriola
realdoctormm
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2007
9:50 pm
93651
For better or worse, RAW seems to allow the CW to place a partisan in East Poland as long as its placed more than 3 hexes from the partition line. Why? Firstly...
paulderynck
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2007
12:37 am
93652
Really, the major non-cooperating minors problems are all on the Axis side. Although if you look at the pre-war attitudes in places like Belgium and...
Wendell
wifwendell
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2007
1:15 am
93653
US entry options are chosen during the US Entry step, after the movement and all that is finished. The US declares war during an impulse. I don't believe that...
Wendell
wifwendell
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2007
1:16 am
93654
I agree with Tom. The only positive thing I hear about the cooperation issues with minors is simple historical constraints of some specific minors. It's...
lbinflorida42
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2007
7:20 am
Messages 93625 - 93654 of 105505   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help