here some axis winning tips overall: - play with the modified set ups (less us at start forces - play with the modified rules - bid (since most people believe...
The marine walking rule is IMHO misunderstood to some degree by most: 1) The first para of 2.5 says everything is either a home country or territory, period,...
Under 22.4.2 Field artillery units the ONLY portion of the rules that even mentions aircraft is the 2nd para where it bombards as if it's "printed combat...
a while ago i got a bad beating on this list for stating that you could use art cf as add on to ac cf (that is 5 cf inf supported by 5 cf lnd + 5 cf art = 15...
then you are playing a house rule (attacker only is a house rule). the real question should be, can in the 2d10 the defender reject the winterised bonus just...
Perhaps. We believe that the table only requires obligatory losses from the attacker and that as that's not quite clear in case of winterised units that's just...
Not sure what the big issue was before as 11.16.4 says "ART units can also provide ground support...". I really don't know how "art are essentially non flying...
Harold the 2D10 states at the top that any modifiers that conflict with the table from the rules or other charts are superceded by the 2D10. Weather mods for...
sorry, but no, art do not perform a gstrike mission, they bombard. only ac "fly" missions. the word missions is reserved for ac, its not used in any context...
sorry, but no, art do not perform a gstrike mission, they bombard. only ac "fly" missions. the word missions is reserved for ac, its not used in any context...
the table says that if the modifires conflict, these 2d10 modifiers have precedence. i do not interpret this as the modifiers having precedence over raw. at...
... Hi Harold, I granted no such right! :-) The units had to trace to oil they could really trace to. In the example, it so happened that none of the 3...
I certainly wouldn't say that we thought there were no loopholes! But thanks for this. Next time there's a rules update, I'll try to get something like this...
Hi Harold, ... What modifications are these? ... Bidding for # research points needed would seem like a good idea. Minimum of 250 and let the bold Allied...
but dave, but that's exactly the point, they are getting sneaky :) 40 ships in tokyo trace and can only trace to 10 oil in tokyo with each oil being tapped up...
responses after ** ... ** the at start political points have been modified ... ** the bat is a beauty, but that 15 ftr is pretty pesky too. did you ever check...
I tried one response on this thread, and the ether bunny ate it. What I had proposed was that since ships remaining at sea have to have a port to return to...
The rule on the chart clearly applies to both attacker and defender. It may not be the designers intent and anybody's group may decide to play it differently...
I disagree with your interpretation of the chart. It does not clearly say one way or the other. The fact that it doesn't say one way or the other is being...
Why not oil only? units at sea are already supplied. Jeff ... have a port to return to (otherwise they are destroyed), you should simply trace to supply and...
You trace a path to the oil, but you are beating a dead horse here. This was the gist of the previous discussion ad nauseum (ala: if something is "like"...
I respectfully disagree. It doesn't solve the perceived problem of re-oiling units at sea by using isolated oil, unless you further stipulate: - units at sea...
... He suggested a rules change. This would require ships at sea to reorg at end of turn to have been able to return to base to a port that is in supply....
... That's what he's saying: "trace to supply and oil from that port." It makes sense to me that if you want to unflip ships at sea that they must be able to...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
