No it's not. The OOS TRS is flipped at the end of its move, so it can't use his transport capacity. Cheers ! _________________________________________________ ...
It's not legal. Naval units that begin the movement OOS must be turn face down at the end of the naval move. Besides, its range and naval movement is decrease...
No. The transport can move but is flipped face down since it have no supply at the start of the move. A face-down transport cannot embark anything. Molle...
I would say an OOS TRS can't do this because naval units that are OOS can move but the penalties are that they have one less move and are turned faced down in...
How can you argue with "If, during production (see 13.6), it is possible for the promised resources (or build points) to be delivered then they must be...
We're steadily falling behind in our game reports. If there's interest I can post the Allied information (which is the correct and trusted news) with the...
... OOS can ... turned faced ... have no ... end its ... units ... coastal ... Being face down does not mean that the Transport has used it transport capacity...
If a person initiating naval combat w/ a cv spots by making a search roll and then the defending cv group makes their search roll does this allow simultaneous...
A friend of mine believes that marine units has movement capabilties as the same as ships (move in sea patrol boxes). I believe that marines can only move out...
I imagine this would be resolved as any other naval air mission. ... From: Chris Conway To: wifdiscussion@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:20...
I believe you are correct and your friend is wrong. ... From: Chris Conway To: wifdiscussion@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:31 PM Subject:...
Being face-down means the TRS loses its ability to embark units. In essence this means it has lost its tranpsort capacity except if it already has a unit...
Please post the reports. I am very interested in reading them, especially the truth behind the bodyguaed of lies. Steve Balk Iowa, USA ... From: bnowak@......
For resources, they ARE delivered. You just don't accept the game's definition of deliver. For BPs, they are NOT delivered, you are correct. But at the time...
... I cannot find anywhere in the rules that a TRS loses its transport capacity if it is facedown except if it allready carries a unit nor that it loses its...
... The question was about embark a when you stop ie not moving. so this would apply when emabarking in a port and continue to move afterwards. If the...
In a message dated 8/1/2006 1:13:12 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, bnowak@... writes: Allied information (which is the correct and trusted news) with the...
I'm not sure when it was changed but at some point instead of needing 8 objectives you now need 15. Moreover, your bid is modified by the expected 15...
As far as I know, the expected Axcios Objectives has been 15 since WiFFE first came about. Maybe it was lower in RAW 1, but it has definitely been 15 since...
Is there anyone in the Atlanta area looking for a game? My group is starting a new WiF campaign and we are looking for a couple more players. /Mirko...
It simple look at the bills of laden: are they FOB if so the the reciepient owns the resources at the dock. :-) Tom Bell Reliant Commercial 1800 St. James...
Is the mtn unit in Lyons FF or VF? Also, the allies have done quite a job in building up FF. What sort of lending was done and where was the FF capital?...
My point is this: you can't load up your convoys with your own resources to exclude the ability to pay lend-lease to someone. You must deliver the lend-lease...
That's exactly what it says. An OOS transport might be able to leave port with someone on it, and then flip when it gest to the sea zone, but it definitely...
I think this is not the way the rule was intended to be played. If you want to split hairs that fine, go ahead, but I don't agree with your interpretation. ...