good evening, the rules give you the steps for became a retreat, the oponent must choose, but never against the steps, if you can retreat to B and D Hexs, the...
Dear Christian, the problem is that B and D are exactly the same both full and both in a ZOC. The difference only becomes apparent one hex further out: A can...
Hi again.... I think that if B and D are exactly the same both full and both in a ZOC and you have other option to place the retreats, forgot B and D becose...
Some incorrect answers, I edited out the portions that were correct. ... had ... else. Thus ... rules right ... Incorrect, the carried unit may start with the...
... war ... CW. ... Yes, on the other hand, Italian units in Egypt is subject to attack from the CW, because they are occupying German hexes. See 9.9 multiple...
The retreat rules make it prety clear that you make the decision hex by hex. i.e. look at the priorities, retreat once, look at the priorities, retreat once,...
... neutral. ... No, see section 9, interaction with countries you are not at war with: You can't enter a hex controlled by: ï a neutral minor country; ï a...
hi, assuming optionals los, compulsory peace, oil, scs transport and factory destruction/construction. look at it from the japanese perspective, s/o 39 ussr...
Reading through the rules carefully, this is how I understand the vearious rules. Here I consider the first version of the rules to be "even" level (even...
... Sorry, I assumed option 49 for RAW7. But RAW 7 without option 49 is not clear IMHO. If in supply bonus is included (in the chart, not in rules), the rule...
... quoting RAW7: "Option 49: (Hitler's war) Replace notes (b), (d) and (e) of the Production Multiples Table with: " that means (I guess) that without option...
Isn't this a bit daft? I mean the rules say that a unit should be retreated to avoid overstacking, if possible. If one hex would - continuing the retreat -...
... quoting RAW7: "Option 49: (Hitler's war) Replace notes (b), (d) and (e) of the Production Multiples Table with: " that means (I guess) that without option...
Hello everybody, sorry for my bad english and for the strange question I'm going to introduce. I'm not much experienced with Wif but I think that naval rules...
... Thanks for these fixes. I should not try answering rules question by memory ... The 3 "legs" ATR seems somehow surprising but, right, nothing in the rules ...
... when ... I ... and ... I think earlier there was an idea that the sea boxes would have several tracks: one for shore bombarders, one for convoyers and one...
Okay, let's see if I can make this clear. The production rules from RAW 6 are unchanged by LoC 15 and RAW 7 *unless* you are playing the "Hitler's War"...
The rules also say 11.11.4 Neutral major powers You can only move a land unit of a neutral major power into: * a hex it controls; or * a hex controlled by...
... Yes. There are many people that object to this. They argue that under those circumstances the CW would consider itself to be at war with Italy. My...
You've left out the actual RAW 7 - your listing is for RAW 7 + Hitler's War. Plain old RAW 7 is identical to RAW 6 with respect to production multiples. The...
... I added that in later. But that is not the point. What I find disturbing is that LOC15 was also named Hitler's War. Now RAW7 has an option 49 Hitler's War...
Many, but not all, of the rules changes are playtested. But the changes to RAW undergo far more testing and scrutiny than things in house of rules. Even those...
Alex, I think you're expecting too much just because you think you "know" where the enemy is going. The sea areas represent vast expanses of ocean. Just...
Preferable to whom? Since the attacker is selecting the retreat hex, shouldn't the attacker get to decide what is more preferable? To answer your other...
Are Convoy in Flames and Cruisers in Flames still on schedule for April 7th? Dave S "Every nation has an army. Either it's own, or someone else's." - Unknown ...
I have some questions on America in Flames Who can drop an A-Bomb, and what planes can carry it? The rules say a US 9+strat factor bomber, however the AiF book...
alan@...
Apr 1, 2003 7:14 pm
51561
I think it's fine the way it it. Knowing is NOT the same as finding. The Brits *knew* where the Bismarck was several times - but did not find it (in the WiF...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
