I'm putting my deck together for next week's game, and I'm getting a bit twitchy over it. Let me explain. What if I want to play mainly the Doctor's side -TC's...
I'd been reading To the Rescue differently - that it added a requirement for winning the game (you need to oppose or destroy one goal), not that it replaced...
... requirement for winning the game (you need to oppose or destroy one goal), not that it replaced the current requirement of Reaching the Goal. So with To...
... Krista, you're reading it right. If it's not clear, I'll tweak the wording, but it ADDS a requirement, it doesn't replace. How does that impact your...
... requirement for winning the game (you need to oppose or destroy one goal), not that it replaced the current requirement of Reaching the Goal. So with To...
... I've already dismissed this out of hand because it's much too far down the road to change the rules this much. Rules changes will now be brought about by...
... down the road to change the rules this much. Rules changes will now be brought about by new cards, which will then spawn more cards, etc. This is a better...
... Plays on table (even during Set Up). At the start of your turn, you may place this card on an opponent's Goal where you have The Doctor. Once per turn, you...
... It's still a rules change very late in the game. I find the solution inelegant to say the least. In your example, you have to tear the house down to build...
... feeling the "both Reach and Oppose" idea was voted down when we originally instituted the winning conditions. I'd like to see what arguments were touted...
... Ah, OK - it kinda negates the whole thing really, as 'good and evil' must still be balanced. ** It's probably my Middle Earth background, but I don't have...
... Well, since you've asked my opinion on this syntax, I feel obligated to give it. Firstly, this wording allows you to be very fast about destroying the...
... problem with having to balance the 'good' and 'evil' sides in a deck. What I didn't like before was that the 'good' side could be completely ignored....
... you may ... Once ... this ... Goal. You ... your ... obligated ... rid ... end ... Ok, insert 'once on your turn'! *With the "?-3" points scored, from one...
Ok, a few more words on the subject. You do realize Undo and Rescue are intertwined so that changing one may necessitate changing the other. First: I think To...
... Well, since you've asked my opinion on this syntax, I feel obligated to give it. Firstly, this wording allows you to be very fast about destroying the...
... TtR's ... you ... since you have to play a Goal during Set-Up, there's going to be a Goal for your opponent to Oppose no matter what. It's just that, as ...
... are intertwined so that changing one may necessitate changing the other. Oh yes! :) This is a great topic isn't it! ... Oppose a Goal. That way, the...
... I find it very frustrating, actually. ... You won't let go of this, will you? Opinions sought from everyone on the list... ... Yes, and there's more...
... To be honest this has gone back and forth so much I am rather confused by it all. What i would suggest is leave the card/s be for now and you guys playtest...
... Rescue ... OK, Ok. Let's call time on this. To Colin: We ARE playtesting the hell out of the game - 90+ games in fact. That's why I come here with...
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the whoccg group: How do you feel about a change in the rules that would force you to both Reach AND...
whoccg@yahoogroups.com
Aug 3, 2006 2:02 pm
1263
OK, the last Impossible Planet cards are up, so here are my comments: 1. First up, I'm really pleased about the rule change and subsequent changes to Undo Evil...
... Yes. Among other things. Many Purposes prevent you from having other Purposes, for example. ... I'll look into it. I don't HAVE to add the first bit,...
OK, a few tweaks I see: 1. UE – you still have to change the `a' to `the' in the last sentence 2. Wake the Devil – ah. Ok, 2 History added. 3. Descent into...
Firstly, on the rules change: Simon, please make sure that this does not lead to stalemating or overuse of Undo Evil, especially the second. If the only way to...
... Would requiring that at least 2 of the Minions be distinct help this? That is, you couldn't use The Beast and 3 Ood, you'd have to use The Beast, Toby and...
... Cards do what they say and no more or less. If it doesn't say it's destroyed, it isn't destroyed. Look at, say, Crashed Spacecraft or Time Storm: they...
... does ... I'll try to, but there was a real lack of interaction and Doctor opposing goals in our games. The rules change will hopefully get more fights and...
... Reach ... Characters. ... Mike had added 2 History, which is simpler. ... Sutekh and The Beast are both Cost 6, which I think Mike was referring to!...
