... That's "Nash plays Majesty, which costs 1 blood. He burns 1 blood when playing it for TF". ... Nash doesn't pay the 1-blood cost of the Majesty (card text...
32
LSJ
vtesrep
Oct 18, 2002 12:33 pm
... No. After the first, the weapon will no longer be doing ranged damage. -- LSJ (vtesrep@...) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES...
33
LSJ
vtesrep
Oct 18, 2002 1:41 pm
... He remains a prince. ... No. ... Yes. It cares only if the action is successful (unblocked), ot if the bleed (if it was a bleed action) succeeds (or if the...
34
LSJ
vtesrep
Oct 23, 2002 11:54 am
... Hmm. Looks like. While the former ruling is more intuitive, it is more difficult to get a proper explanation for. Still, the intuitiveness probably...
35
LSJ
vtesrep
Oct 29, 2002 1:06 pm
... The latter. Similarly, if the Life Boon were played on [B] instead, then [A] would not get the VP for [B]'s oust. Which indicates that the Life Boon comes...
36
LSJ
vtesrep
Nov 7, 2002 1:18 pm
... Sure. ... No. ... It applies to the next strike, whether it has been declared yet or no. ... No. ... Moot, but no. Combat cards' effects apply only to the...
37
LSJ
vtesrep
Nov 12, 2002 1:37 pm
... That's a good point. He's controlled by his temporary master until his owner's next untap phase. If his owner doesn't have a "next untap phase" (e.g.,...
38
LSJ
vtesrep
Nov 15, 2002 12:58 pm
... Yes. Card text indicates that the damage is not part of the successful resolution of the action. ... Time, yes. Means, no. You cannot play a combat-starter...
39
LSJ
vtesrep
Nov 15, 2002 2:40 pm
... No. Attempting to inflict zero aggravated damage isn't sufficient. -- LSJ (vtesrep@...) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news,...
40
LSJ
vtesrep
Nov 18, 2002 12:50 pm
... Yes. ... If it leads to another bleed, then the minion simply remains untapped; he doesn't take the prohibited bleed action at all, so it doesn't exactly...
41
LSJ
vtesrep
Nov 18, 2002 12:56 pm
... Acting players orders the events. The one ordered first resolves. The one ordered later doesn't, since it is no longer around when the time comes. ... ...
42
LSJ
vtesrep
Nov 20, 2002 1:06 pm
... While I don't have all the facts, it sounds like the judge made decisions that fit with the facts you've provided. The judge might have sided with the...
43
LSJ
vtesrep
Nov 26, 2002 12:44 pm
... Psyche! in both cases. Since it is a combat card, its timing window comes before the timing window for Hidden Lurker and Fast Reaction (the latter two...
44
LSJ
vtesrep
Dec 3, 2002 12:50 pm
... It's still in effect. If Psyche! could be played at all, it would interrupt the IotK. But since it cannot be played, it won't. ... No. It has queued a "go...
45
LSJ
vtesrep
Dec 4, 2002 12:52 pm
... If he was Banished: He's still the guest. Banished vampires remember themselves and other effects in play remember them as well. If he was burned: He's a...
46
LSJ
vtesrep
Dec 9, 2002 1:39 pm
... Yes. It is a combat card. ... No. He doesn't get the ability to use it "as a vampire", and it offers no utility to a non-vampire. ... Yes. It is a combat...
47
LSJ
vtesrep
Dec 9, 2002 4:47 pm
... He's got two effects on him that temporarily change his clan. The Derange changes his clan to !Malk until he moves it. The Clan Impersonation changes his...
48
LSJ
vtesrep
Dec 16, 2002 2:46 pm
... Correct. Card text allows SCS to use a card that requires "a" discipline as a vampire with that Discipline. It doesn't grant the SCS two disciplines for...
49
LSJ
vtesrep
Dec 17, 2002 12:59 pm
... No. ... He's tainted, since the action is done (it wasn't canceled before resolution). ... No. -- LSJ (vtesrep@...) V:TES Net.Rep for White...
50
LSJ
vtesrep
Dec 26, 2002 1:53 pm
... Good question. It seems that it would work, except for an old RTR ruling to handle the ruling that allowed formerly "Kindred Only" retainers to be employed...
51
LSJ
vtesrep
Jan 4, 2003 12:33 pm
... Correct. ... No. It is a separate damaging effect from the minion (distinct from the strike). [LSJ 26-JUN-2001] [LSJ 08-JAN-2002] ... It is playable "as"...
52
LSJ
vtesrep
Jan 12, 2003 9:55 pm
... Yes. ... Not playable, since G is not the acting minion. ... The table is correct. Fast Reaction is only playable after a combat between your blocking...
53
LSJ
vtesrep
Jan 14, 2003 12:59 pm
... Yes. Once it is determined that the combat "cycle" produces no result (no change in game state), it would be stalling to continue the cycle. -- LSJ...
54
LSJ
vtesrep
Jan 25, 2003 2:16 pm
... No. You burn it to get +bleed just like you would play Threats (although, of course, you can burn Melange before or after playing other bleed modifiers,...
55
LSJ
vtesrep
Jan 30, 2003 12:37 pm
... The cost paid is retrieved. In a perfect world, it should be simply "not paid" instead of "retrieved". For instance, if you have a Realm of the Black Sun...
56
LSJ
vtesrep
Feb 13, 2003 4:18 pm
... Nope. You're on new ground here, AFAIK. Congratulations. :-) ... A). Normal (including "as normal") damage is handled first. -- LSJ...
57
LSJ
vtesrep
Feb 14, 2003 7:06 pm
Using the Bomb in combat hurts the bearer, as always, even when it is used by a Ghoul Retainer. The CE text says "strike", but that is too restrictive. ...
58
LSJ
vtesrep
Feb 14, 2003 8:27 pm
... Note: all references to UP are to the non-superior version: Correct. UP requires you to be on your way to torpor, which you are not, by the previously...
59
LSJ
vtesrep
Feb 19, 2003 2:10 pm
... Good point. I was considering the "lose control" as an event to be ordered. REVERSAL: But it's not, as was established for Malkavian Dementia. Instead, you...
60
LSJ
vtesrep
Feb 19, 2003 7:45 pm
... Sorry for the whiplash, but a very observant Stone has pointed out that there's also a ruling that says the damage done is done after resolution but still...
