--- In uk-scrabble@yahoogroups.com, "paulthomson1389"
<paulthomson1389@...> wrote:
>
> Then you and every other 5 pts p.c. supporter really
> ought to conduct the rest of any pro 5 pts p.c.
> campaigning without further reference to a line of
> argument ["frivolous challenges"] that is so weak in
> intellectual rigour and so obviously & deeply flawed.
>

Paul,

Please just try it. The pro-argument is being led by people who've
played it. The anti-argument is a series of preconceptions led by
people who mostly haven't. At least base opposition on experience, not
preconceived ideas.

Phil R.