I described my M2 and R2 methods in more detail on my website now. Also includes a little demo video. http://stefan-pochmann.info/spocc/blindsolving/M2R2/ ...
Hi Stefan, I just looked through the page. Very cool concept; I might need to give it a try. It's very cool that the algorithms are so short even though M2 and...
Well, if it's posible to memorise in under 20s, and if you can execute in 40 like he says... I think I'll give it a try too...looks very cool...maybe I can...
... figure them out? the M2 ones are not that hard, as I already know them with orienting edges first...but I don't know about the R2 ones... I'm sure you can...
The M2 setups weren't hard, as I expected... today I went to your site to print the setups before going to the university, so I could take a deeper look...but...
I think memorizing the cube in 20 seconds or less each time is very possible, if not quicker. Think about memo'ing a deck of cards in 30 seconds, that is...
... D sticker...I think it's easier to shoot from FD...at least on the first one, since you don't have to turn the cube that much...but that's just a little...
Stefan, could you elaborate exactly what you mean? consider the cycle for edges to be (DF FR UL RB UF LD RU UB DR DB FL) like your example. does this mean you...
... cycle ... example. ... Yes. ... I break into new cycles just like with my old method. I should probably mention that one on the new method page. ...
... with ... Hi Macky, I wouldn't say "easily" but yes, I think that's possible, at least a record average. Memorization is basically the same as my older...
Hi, Can you explain why the fourth target should be DB in your example Stefan? I would like it to be UF, then on the other hand I haven't solved a single cube...
I need some clarification. What is "buffer"? And from the "buffer" you 'shoot' your piece at the 'target' just like your old method right Stefan? Brian Pedro...
... you 'shoot' your piece at the 'target' just like your old method right Stefan? Yes, it basically works exactly like my old method, it's just faster. I use...
So you look at the piece in the buffer area according to the stickers. And by the algs/set-up moves from your page execute them doing it piece by piece and...
... stickers. And by the algs/set-up moves from your page execute them doing it piece by piece and repeat with the corners. Is that how it works or am I...
I have a weird case here. I don't know what scramble I used, but I used Orange as front and yellow as top. I am on EP/EO with two edes left. In my buffer, I...
If you are left with 2 and it is red/yellow it means that either it would be solved with merely: M2. Or (with stefan's way), do M2 and there would be 2...
When I do M2 though, the centers are swapped. Is this a case of parity? megafrikkie <megafrikkie@...> wrote: If you are left with 2 and it is red/yellow...
If you just have two edges left to swap, then you have a parity error. This means you need to swap two corners with two edges to solve it. ... either it...
You'll probably have a parity then. If the UF is white/red the DB yellow/orange and the DF and UB solved but the centers wrong you have a parity. ... parity?...
The one on his site labeled "odd parity." After solving for edges, you should have an M2 that needs to be undome. After solving for corners, you should have...
Ohhh. I see now. So apply the parity algs at the end of the solve is that correct? stochastic_antishift <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote: The one on...
Hi Stefan, You told me you were gonna publish this after breaking the WR and winning the event at the WC ;). Whaha.. Very cool you made a page about this...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
Offline 
Send Email