Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
silent-tower-metw
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 2540 - 2569 of 3873   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
2540
Hi Wolfgang, Yes, I'm hoping there will be another CyberCon sooner rather than later and as I said it will be minion sealed this time ;-)) Yours in Middle...
BlueMonday@...
Send Email
Nov 1, 2002
9:25 pm
2541
Greetings from The Guild Companion, The November 2002 (#45) issue of The Guild Companion is now available at http://www.guildcompanion.com We present a special...
N.H.M. Caldwell
nhmc1@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2002
11:43 am
2542
Hello all, A rules question arised during a game between the Balrog and a Radagast Quest's deck (a deck featuring Anduril, King under the Mountain and Mithril,...
Iirion Claus
IrCarX@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2002
6:34 pm
2543
... No. Balrog rules: For the purposes of playing hazards, a Free-hold is never considered to be the surface site of an Under-deeps site. K. ... To...
Kuba Krchak
gkg@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2002
6:37 pm
2544
But after a Balrog torches either the BMDH or the IHDH, then it becomes a surface site of an Under-deeps site, right? Patrick Cochran ... To unsubscribe,...
Patrick Cochran
pat_anna@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2002
7:57 pm
2545
... Completely according to the rule - Invade Their Domain doesn't make it a surface site, but Lord and Usurper does, because it changes it to a shadow-hold...
Kuba Krchak
gkg@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2002
8:05 pm
2546
This is really an "odd game" report, but I thought it'd be enjoyable. Last night I played a King Under the Mountain deck with the dwarves from the Hobbit and...
Krista Donnelly
kldonnelly@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2002
9:09 pm
2547
Hi everyone: I have questions regarding Company vs Company Combat(CvCC). I have a minion company with Lt. of Dol Guldur, Lt. of Angmar(tapped), 2 orc snifflers...
Antonio Cardenas
lt_of_morgul@...
Send Email
Nov 3, 2002
3:33 am
2548
Hi All - Just added some more MECCG singles - check out the link below for details. Also, if anyone is interested in picking up some LOTR singles on the cheap,...
David Rice
drice6900@...
Send Email
Nov 3, 2002
9:32 pm
2549
... Every character must participate in CvCC; I'm not sure using Ruse, More Sense Than You, etc. would exempt your character from CvCC if you're the attacker....
Philip T. Carroll
nimrandir@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
4:39 am
2550
Ladies and Gentlemen, let me introduce you to the final decision about the word "any." What about Indur? Indur will, when tapped, make "any wounded character...
Chad Martin
chad@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
9:30 am
2551
Hi, ... Look for a review of this (and the Friends & Foes expansion) in a future issue of the GuildCompanion (www.guildcompanion.com). I'm hoping I'll get time...
Nigel Buckle
N.Buckle@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
10:14 am
2552
... Almost. The excess strikes are allocated as -1 modifications to the prowess of the character facing the strike, not +1 modifications to the prowess of the...
Jean-Paul Keulen
slysoutherner@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
10:24 am
2553
... Yup, and I even call them -1 prowess mods for the defender later in the digest. I don't think I'm going to call a reversal on this one, but good catch. ...
Chad Martin
chad@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
11:03 am
2554
I'm not quite sure if the following would qualify as a play of the day (perhaps it is common among you) but for me it was quite exceptional. Anyway, it...
Lord Leuber
lordleuber@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
11:50 am
2555
... <Snip> Thank you Krista for that painful recounting. At least you didn't tell everyone how badly I played, obliviously walking into Agburanar Ahunt, Mike...
Jim Montanus
Jim@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
4:34 pm
2556
... I seldom manage to wipe out all of my opponent's characters (although it's happened to me once or twice . . .). Of course, the downside of the whole thing...
Philip T. Carroll
nimrandir@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
4:42 pm
2557
Jim - Great summing up of the question - better than I could have done. Krista ... Anyway, during the game there was a heated debate between Krista and I about...
Krista Donnelly
Krista.Donnelly@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
4:51 pm
2558
You can play River in the same chain of effects? I would've figured it would start it's own chain. Paul Choquette ... ...
Paul Choquette
pchoquette@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
5:13 pm
2559
Richard, I've been waiting for a little while before I responded to your message. I TOTALLY agree with you about LotR being a money pit, which is one of the...
Levinson, Joseph
levinso1@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
5:18 pm
2560
... Sure you can, as far as I know. Last I checked, only creatures and corruption cards are required to begin new chains of effects. ... Phil aka Nimrandir ...
Philip T. Carroll
nimrandir@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
5:53 pm
2561
... Unassigned attacking characters are distributable -1 prowess modifiers like those gained by excess strikes from a creature. Unassigned defending ...
Andy Fredricksen
andy@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
5:56 pm
2562
... Here's what I found in the CRF, under "Playing Hazards": You check the hazard limit at declaration and resolution. At declaration there must be less...
Philip T. Carroll
nimrandir@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
6:14 pm
2563
Not to beat a dead horse, but I'm surprised to see this apparent reversal which ignores the most critical piece of evidence in the Umagaur/Buthrakaur debate:...
Andy Fredricksen
andy@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
6:19 pm
2564
I usually see Galdor used as cheeze in FW decks to run back and forth to the Grey Havens to draw cards or just squat in a Wizard Haven for the points. If...
Brian Wong
briannocheeze@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
6:25 pm
2565
Galdor? That's nothing. What Dave'll do to really twist your brain around is build a deck based on Galva. That guy's nuts. e x y ... To unsubscribe, e-mail:...
Andy Fredricksen
andy@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
6:43 pm
2566
You can't rely on singular/plural nouns to guide you. I used to and thus always assumed you needed at least two dwarves in a company to play The Dwarves Are...
Krista Donnelly
Krista.Donnelly@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
7:28 pm
2567
I was a witness to this game. It sure was a beating for Sirach. But maybe it is he who deserves the spot for play of the day. The game after this he played...
Chris van der Meer
chris.vd.meer@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
9:31 pm
2568
Andy, The singular you mention is not ignored but considered of little relevance. Like other cards that create an effect that is useable for a certain time you...
w_heemskerk@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
10:11 pm
2569
Point taken. Well, see you guys in a year when U & B reverse their meanings again. e x y ... To unsubscribe, e-mail: metw-unsubscribe@... For...
Andy Fredricksen
andy@...
Send Email
Nov 4, 2002
10:28 pm
Messages 2540 - 2569 of 3873   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help