Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
shako · An e-list in support of Arty Conliffe
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 7635 - 7665 of 9413   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
7635
Hi Mark, thanks for the hint, so the 6 Second Rate Units are Line Battalions. The Author just wouldn't have all the Line Infantry made poor. Regards, Holger...
Holger Puttkammer
ronin4711
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2008
7:50 am
7636
SR is often used for conscript line troops in scenario design. Similarly, you will notice that in Michael's 1805 scenario book Russian grenadiers are not rated...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2008
4:23 pm
7637
... I am no Saxon and therefore can live with the Second Rate Infantry too ;-) I was just wondering if special saxon regiments or troop types were concerned,...
Holger Puttkammer
ronin4711
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2008
5:25 pm
7638
Dear Holger, The eight line regiments are generally poor. Their supporting/independent composite grenadier battalions and light infantry "regiments" and...
swihartmark@...
Send Email
Jul 1, 2008
7:39 pm
7639
Greetings, I have been in this yahoo group almost since the start, haven't posted in a long time. 1st Thanks to Chris Leach for all his time, helping others...
ebersteiner
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2008
3:19 am
7640
Greetings, In the French Army lists for pick up games, you have one skirmisher stand for every 3 Regular, Elite or Second Rate Infantry Battalions. ...
Holger Puttkammer
ronin4711
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2008
4:56 am
7641
Thanks for the comments. Regarding skirmishers, the base size/ figures are the same (roughly the frontage of a regular battalion in line). You will need some...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2008
5:48 am
7643
Holger is right. However, I doubt you will ever need anything like 2 SK for every light battalion. The talk on this site over the years has indicated few...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2008
2:28 pm
7644
... Please send me any typos you observe in the rules for the errata sheet. I have a couple of things on the errata sheet but would like to get some more...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2008
8:49 pm
7645
Does a points system exist to create an army, as an alternative to the army lists contained in the Shako 2 rule book?...
Daniele
mesmerdan
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2008
4:24 pm
7646
Either there is one somewhere in the "Files" section of this site or someone once wrote a message regarding where someone could find one. You might check the...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2008
4:41 pm
7647
Thanks Terry. Will check it out:) Daniele ... or someone ... might ... phrase. ... Behalf Of ... the ... 7/2/2008...
Daniele
mesmerdan
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2008
7:54 pm
7648
Hi ! I currently read Shako II for the first time (I received it yesterday : nice job BTW) I need a clarification p.21: (3. Attacking Infantry opposed by...
jean-marc.huissoud@...
imlad2001
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2008
7:16 am
7649
don't have the rules to hand, but here it goes... When a DC independently (e.g., without an order) decides to halt the division to face a cavalry threat, the...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2008
7:33 am
7650
It does. Thanks a lot. Jean-Marc HUISSOUD ESC Grenoble Département M&C Bureau F407 04 76 70 64 36 _____ De : shako@yahoogroups.com...
jean-marc.huissoud@...
imlad2001
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2008
7:37 am
7651
Hi all Just taken delevery of shako II and looking forward to trying it out. I notice the requirements for rear support 8.14.3 is visable within 6". This is...
mikeaztecsblitz
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
4:08 pm
7652
... Yes, that is correct. ... Yes ... It does state that a unit that may fire MUST fire. Cheers. Chris...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
4:29 pm
7653
I am considering a house rule to reduce the morale rating (for Rallying and Stagger purposes only – not fighting ability or Kills) for both dragoons and ...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
5:25 pm
7654
Chris answered your question already but here is more input. I took this up with the powers that be during the play testing phase. My objection is if you want...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
5:37 pm
7655
I think this is fine, Terry. Arty considered putting in a number of dual MR cavalry types but decided to keep it simpler. No reason why you couldn't do this...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
6:21 pm
7656
I always appreciate any argument that considers the aesthetic, but I think keeping some distance between lines of battalions still makes tactical sense....
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
6:27 pm
7657
You make a good point about enemy ZOC. If one keeps his second line back so it is within 6 inches of his front line, but outside 6 inches of the enemy front...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
6:58 pm
7658
Hi Dick, If you opted for a battalion that is 80mm long in line, you could either use the 9" map squares you've extrapolated from the proportions, or you could...
Michael Hopper
awful_gamer
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
10:48 pm
7659
Thanks for the prompt replys It does seem a bit odd encouraging correct deployment with proper supports whilst at the same time forcing you to risk a stagger...
mikeaztecsblitz
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
10:56 pm
7660
Cheers, Mike. Forcing the decision regarding support is a good thing -- ying and yang decisions should be part of all games. When it was 3 inches of Fallback...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2008
11:39 pm
7661
The scenario book of the first edition "Fields of Glory" is still available and I think about getting a copy. As far as I understood the second edition rules,...
ronin4711
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2008
8:32 am
7662
Since we have been playing (playtesting) Michael's new scenarios, the old book has not had much of a look-in. Yes, more skirmishers might be needed....
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2008
2:22 pm
7663
Chris is too humble. The Fields of Glory scenarios continue to stand on their own merit and are worth purchasing and playing. The difference between the two...
Michael Hopper
awful_gamer
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2008
3:58 pm
7664
All, When might we see the "Big Battles Rules" that did not fit in Shako II? Dave said they would be included in the file section of the Shako website. V/r, ...
Tony Figlia
tfiglia
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2008
11:15 pm
7665
The big battles rules and the SYW stuff all need work to bring them into line with the new rules. It will happen, but slowly (unless someone is volunteering...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jul 7, 2008
12:36 am
Messages 7635 - 7665 of 9413   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help