Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
shako · An e-list in support of Arty Conliffe
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 6025 - 6054 of 9410   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
6025
Hi currently working on a campaign, where is the best place to get complete listings for the Austrians and French for the 1809 campaign down to regimental...
harleyalasdair
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2007
4:44 pm
6026
Recently someone said that the Shako 2 rules would probably allow the Austrians to volley fire with their infantry in Battalion Masse. They would have a -1 ...
ducdallas@...
ducdallas
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2007
5:30 pm
6027
This sound like a bad idea, if true. The Austrian battalionmasse was typically on a one company frontage - if it can volley, why can't the French column of...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2007
5:57 pm
6028
Yes, the battalion masse was indeed just a closed column as used by other nations prior to the 'innovation' by the Austrians. The Shako II Austrian 'column...
cleach@...
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2007
12:18 am
6029
Alasdair, There is an Osprey Campaign Series on Aspern-Esseling and Wagram that gives all the details you need. Castle, Ian, 'Aspern & Wagram 1809: Mighty...
Charles Kirke
charleskirke
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2007
11:28 am
6030
Thanks for that Charles Cheers Alasdair...
harleyalasdair
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2007
4:45 pm
6031
In a message dated 1/2/2007 6:21:43 PM Central Standard Time, cleach@... writes: Yes, the battalion masse was indeed just a closed column as used by other ...
ducdallas@...
ducdallas
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2007
7:27 pm
6032
Alasdair, The best source or Orbats for the 1809 campaign is in a book "Armies of the Danube, 1809" by Scott Bowden. ISBN 0962665509. It has everything that...
peter_scott2002
Offline Send Email
Jan 6, 2007
12:44 am
6033
Alasdair, While I won't dispute whether one or more of the books is out of print "officially", all 3 books are easily obtainable and I can provide a variety of...
Hopper, Michael (EST)
awful_gamer
Offline Send Email
Jan 6, 2007
2:00 am
6034
Hello all. Could I ask for a clarification on Pass Through Fire and moving? 10.5 says that its performed by and against formed units as the target passes...
mark_emms
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2007
3:12 pm
6035
... No - chargers cannot fire. Not sure about the more general first part of your questions, but I think pass through fire is resolved in the normal shooting...
Steve Burt
pyruse
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2007
3:36 pm
6036
Other than shooting at cavalry performing a Breakthrough move, Pass through fire occurs ONLY IF "a target moves through both Flank Lines of an infantry ...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2007
7:03 pm
6037
Peter & Michael Thank you for that information, will get hold of them Cheers Alasdair...
harleyalasdair
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2007
6:53 am
6038
Hi all Some time ago, there was a debate here about units staggered by fire while charging home. Someone suggested that those units could get into fallback...
imlad2001
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2007
3:39 pm
6039
Your opinion please I think the ability for the French to move, change formation and fire in the same phase is a bit of an overwhelming advantage (maybe to be ...
imlad2001
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2007
4:39 pm
6040
I think those poor buggers have enough problems as it is. However, since such a fall back can be an advantage to the owning player (by clearing damaged front...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2007
4:42 pm
6041
I agree with Terry that poor quality troops already have a tough time pressing-home a charge. In Shako II, units in Fallback are in danger of breaking...
cleach@...
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2007
5:18 pm
6042
Yes, it is a big advantage but it is also a way of offering the French a distinction from their eighteenth century bound opponents. While perhaps not 'fair'...
cleach@...
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2007
5:28 pm
6043
... As Chris says, it gets the right end result (French more tactically flexible, and better able to attack). The advantage is not that great - remember that...
Steve Burt
pyruse
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2007
9:54 am
6044
In a message dated 1/15/2007 3:54:59 AM Central Standard Time, steve.and.mary.burt@... writes: s Chris says, it gets the right end result (French more...
ducdallas@...
ducdallas
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2007
4:20 pm
6045
We have had many thoughts expressed about firing at attackers. Something that seems to be a problem in the base rules. Shako2 is apparently going to have some...
ducdallas@...
ducdallas
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2007
5:35 pm
6046
Are you suggesting that a French column should be allowed to right face into line, thus changing its formation while changing its facing 90 degrees, AND THEN...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2007
7:16 pm
6047
Everyone can change formation and facing. Any army's columns can right face or left face to form lines and lines can do the same thing to form columns. What...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2007
7:33 pm
6048
In a message dated 1/15/2007 1:36:26 PM Central Standard Time, TGRINER@... writes: Everyone can change formation and facing. Any army’s columns can...
ducdallas@...
ducdallas
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2007
8:04 pm
6049
I agree the matter is unclear, but I think the rules allow only one formation change in conjunction with a facing change - even for the French. I don't know...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2007
9:24 pm
6050
In a message dated 1/15/2007 3:28:20 PM Central Standard Time, TGRINER@... writes: Rule 8.7 says “...French infantry may not move and form...
ducdallas@...
ducdallas
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2007
9:47 pm
6051
... face into line, thus changing its formation while changing its facing 90 degrees, AND THEN change back into a column with this same new facing all in the...
Tom McCafferty
tommccafferty
Offline Send Email
Jan 20, 2007
1:30 pm
6052
I think the "usually" is meant to refer to artillery and about facing where no formation change is involved. We play a left face or right face MUST include a...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Jan 20, 2007
3:52 pm
6053
Yes, the change of formation is part of the facing change. Chris ... where ... Tom...
cleach@...
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jan 20, 2007
4:06 pm
6054
... facing where no formation change is involved. We play a left face or right face MUST include a change from line to column or column to line. I think the...
Tom McCafferty
tommccafferty
Offline Send Email
Jan 21, 2007
1:38 pm
Messages 6025 - 6054 of 9410   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help