Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
shako · An e-list in support of Arty Conliffe
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 5747 - 5776 of 9418   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
5747
Gents, I am in the starting phase of planning a new Napoleonic campaign, and it seems likely that Shako will get the nod as the campaign rules. Going from ...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 1, 2006
11:35 am
5748
If it comes out in 2006, it would be at the end of December. It is more likely that ColdWars 2007 will be the realease time -- lots of production values in...
cleach@...
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Aug 1, 2006
4:27 pm
5749
Hi, We had an enjoyable game today, and have firmly decided on using Shako for our upcoming campaign. While we were going through the rules, we managed to ...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 3, 2006
4:48 pm
5750
Yet another question! ;) When attacking from one Town Sector to another, I moved another battalion into the now abandoned town sector that I was attacking...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 3, 2006
4:51 pm
5751
45 degree difference is the official ruling on this. Cheers, Chris ... different ... alignment...
cleach@...
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Aug 3, 2006
7:16 pm
5752
Attackers stay in the village sector if they lose the melee and must vacate it if they win. So yes, the sector is temporaily unoccupied. Chris...
cleach@...
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Aug 3, 2006
7:19 pm
5753
I see Chris says you can not move a battalion into the vacated town because the attacking battalion might have to fall back into it, either because of being...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Aug 4, 2006
1:48 am
5754
... I don't know, but we've always played interpretation 2; this makes rear support consistent with flank support, which allows for small bends in the line....
Steve Burt
pyruse
Offline Send Email
Aug 4, 2006
9:40 am
5755
Here is what I like: The extended flank lines (zone of control, if you like) of the supporting battalion must cover at least half of the rear line of the...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Aug 4, 2006
4:00 pm
5756
That's more or less what I was thinking, using the flank lines to define it just as the flank support is defined. Except, your version reverses who has to...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 4, 2006
4:25 pm
5757
Yes, leaving the "attacked from" zone empty leaves the situation open to all sorts of "gamesmanship" opportunities. Either your version (everybody pushed back...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 4, 2006
4:29 pm
5758
A related question: Can a unit give rear support to more than one unit? It is possible to position the rear unit so that 1/2 of it is behind one unit, and the...
Mickey Juif
french_admiral
Offline Send Email
Aug 4, 2006
4:39 pm
5759
My understanding is Yes, that is a supporting unit (column or line) was deployed exactly in the middle of two adjacent (touching) lines, it would support both....
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 4, 2006
4:50 pm
5760
Damn! I noticed my crude example didn't come over very well (damn HTML!!!). Picture the lower "xxxx" shifted to the right a bit. Mickey Juif...
Mickey Juif
french_admiral
Offline Send Email
Aug 4, 2006
4:50 pm
5761
We allow 1 line to support two lines, or up to three columns. By rule 8.1.2b the three columns would have to be lined up exactly with the supporting line to...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Aug 5, 2006
2:58 pm
5762
Colin Skirmishers are single battalion bases, if a light battalion breaks down into a skirmisher unit it becomes ONE skirmisher stand. At the scale of Shako...
Harrison, Simon - She...
cyjanharrison
Offline Send Email
Aug 9, 2006
1:44 pm
5763
Hi again, I'm in the final stages of planning our campaign (keeps getting bigger, 3+ corps per side now), and had some questions before our next practice game....
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
6:36 pm
5764
Hi again, A couple of more thoughts on cavalry. 1. Before our next game, I wanted to clarify that only infantry battalions cannot change formation within the...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
6:42 pm
5765
There is a version of Advanced Shako which makes LI 4/2 MR instead of 4/1. This in effect makes them better fighters in woods, which I rather like. It makes...
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
8:14 pm
5766
1. No formed unit may change formation while within the 6 inch flank lines "zone of control" of an enemy formed unit. This includes enemy artillery. 2....
TERRY GRINER
twgriner
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
8:30 pm
5767
I agree with Terry. The work around for this, which was practiced on a routine basis by almost all nations' cavalry was a retrograde movement. In principal, ...
Hopper, Michael (EST)
awful_gamer
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
8:44 pm
5768
Thank you for your reply - notes below. Christopher ... flank lines ... artillery. ... CAT: If this is indeed so, it needs clarification in the second edition....
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
9:02 pm
5769
The 4/2 change also makes them better when flanked, etc. however - maybe it would be more straightforward to simply give them +1 in woods/rough? Are there...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
9:03 pm
5770
The retrograde movement allowance makes sense. However, one might argue that the manouver is, in fact, a Fallback manouver ... ;) Of course, the manouver you...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
9:13 pm
5771
I understand. I should have also added a couple further comments that we respect the following rules, which over ride any option to retrograde. 1. Formation...
Hopper, Michael (EST)
awful_gamer
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
9:21 pm
5772
In a message dated 8/18/2006 4:15:10 PM Central Standard Time, christopher@... writes: However, the very strict manouver rules *do* make you think...
ducdallas@...
ducdallas
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2006
9:29 pm
5773
The relationship between firing ranges and movement allowances is one of the first things that hit me, and seems very well balanced. Just as in reality, one...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2006
4:56 pm
5774
Michael, It sounds like you've thought this through very thoroughly, and incorporated experience from actual play, which is always best. Thank you for the ...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2006
5:04 pm
5775
From the title of the post, you can probably tell that I'm going to ask about 2nd Rate troops. ;) I'm a little uncomfortable with rating "conscript" (though...
Christopher TenWolde
catenwolde
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2006
8:05 pm
5776
I wish you well on your trials. I won't openly promote the local "house" rules most of the time. Shako is a work of art. I respect though that a primary...
Hopper, Michael (EST)
awful_gamer
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2006
8:33 pm
Messages 5747 - 5776 of 9418   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help