Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
sfconsim-l
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
A test for vacuum energy   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #80406 of 81959 |
Re: [sfconsim-l] Re: A test for vacuum energy



--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Henry Cobb <henry.cobb@...> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Erik Max Francis<max@alcyone. com> wrote:

>>After all, you hardly need general relativity to explain why being able
>>to pull a body out of a gravitational field doesn't violation
>>conservation of energy; it's because you're supplying the energy by
>>pulling it out, doing work against the force of gravity.

>Take a certain amount of energy and create an electron-positron
>pair in deep space.

>Then move this pair to the surface of the moon and turn them
>back into a pair of gamma rays and measure them locally and
>you will see the same amount of energy as before.

Only if you absorbed the extra energy generated by lowering
the electron and positron into the gravity well. On the
other hand, if you just let them freefall to the surface
of the moon, then their extra kinetic energy will be
added to the resulting gamma rays.

>But if you send these gamma rays out into deep space you
>will find there that you don't have quite enough energy
>to remake the electron-positron pair because of the
>gravitational red shift than manifests as a difference
>in time rates.

The gamma rays generated by the freefalling pair will
have just enough extra energy to compensate for the
red shift.

Isaac Kuo mechdan@...







Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:16 pm

mechdan
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #80406 of 81959 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Since there is never any violation of the conservation of energy, there can be no vacuum energy. And I have a test for its non-existence. The ...
Henry Cobb
henry_cobb
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
1:33 am

... According to this logic, gravity doesn't exist....
ac_jackson
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
2:53 am

Nope, gravity works just fine. Objects that fall into a gravity field "lose time" to make up for the potential energy they give up....
Henry Cobb
henry_cobb
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
4:33 am

... Okay, if you want to interpret gravity that way, consider electromagnetism....
ac_jackson
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
5:07 am

... Huh? If you're referring to gravitational time dilation, then the fact that clocks run more slowly in a gravitational field has to do with length of paths...
Erik Max Francis
erikmaxfrancis
Online Now Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
7:19 am

... Take a certain amount of energy and create an electron-positron pair in deep space. Then move this pair to the surface of the moon and turn them back into ...
Henry Cobb
henry_cobb
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
5:00 pm

... Yes, that's a feature of general relativity (and, as I said, the cause is the curvature of spacetime, not gravitational time dilation; gravitational...
Erik Max Francis
erikmaxfrancis
Online Now Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
7:37 pm

... No, they are unrelated. ... Actually, it just demonstrates that you didn't take into account energy you put into the system by prying the sheets apart....
Erik Max Francis
erikmaxfrancis
Online Now Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
7:15 am

... Only if you absorbed the extra energy generated by lowering the electron and positron into the gravity well. On the other hand, if you just let them...
Isaac Kuo
mechdan
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
6:16 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help