On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Robin <robinvoigt@...> wrote:
Here is where I point out that while that may be true for some of the
people on here bellyaching about round robin excercises with no rhyme
or reason, some of us actually do incorporate actual systems into the
games we play, even when we do them online. Sitting with cheetos at a
tabletop is no more valid a way to play a game.
Now that that's out of the way, do you actually have something substantiative to add? Possibly something about what kind of resolution systems your "games" involve, how they avoid the issues raised by the original poster or how they succumb to them regardless (and thus providing counter-evidence of my supposition), or something of that ilk?
Oh, yes, and buggeration, if you must top-post, at least trim the bloody reply. We worked that process out with the second email ever sent back in the 60's. Give it a go, it makes the rough splatters of flung poo on the wall marginally easier to read.
--
Alexander Williams (thantos@...)
Operation BSU (http://operationbsu.livejournal.com)
"Like a morning show. Only interesting. And at night."
--
Alexander Williams (thantos@...)
Operation BSU (http://operationbsu.livejournal.com)
"Like a morning show. Only interesting. And at night."