Having problems with message search?
Latest definition of Planehuggers that was deleted three times from Wikipedia. One guy said (in a later deletion note) "Are you implying that the attacks were faked?'' (duhhh)
Another guy took issue with the article and said it lacked NPOV...(a Neutral Point of View) even though the official story was linked to and the truthlings were linked to (can't wait to try that term on Wikipedia!). Then they don't like neologisms and they said Planehugger didn't have enough Google hits (57), while PlanehuggerS had near 500 and climbing. Also a comment about the tried and true tin foil chapeau.
Archived debate follows definition.
Planehuggers is a recent political neologism that has been used on the World Wide Web frequently in newsgroups[1] and blogs.The term refers to those people in the 9/11 Truth Movement who believe that real, full size commercial passenger jets or planes were used in the 9/11 event. There have been many serious researchers questioning the official account of 9/11 in the Truth Movement such as Morgan Reynolds, who feel they have proven that a real, commercial jet was not used at the Pentagon explosions nor were real passenger jets used at the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center. They make what they believe to be a credible case of inserted animation video (Computer-generated imagery)[2] combined with military grade projections possibly cloaking missiles and therefore refer to those in the 9/11 Truth Movement who cling to the original 'official story' as huggers of planes or planehuggers since they embrace the aspect of the original story as delivered by the mass media of commercial jets being used to create the damage to the Pentagon and the Twin Towers and refuse to alter their thinking regardless of new analysis of evidence.[3] The term is used somewhat derisively and sometimes linked to the concept of these 'planehuggers' being disinformation agents. While some like to refer to these research people as espousers of 9/11 conspiracy theories, these researchers are merely presenting alternative hypotheses [4]to the official government story[5]which is in itself by definition a conspiracy theory . For further research please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Alternative_theories_of_September_11%2C_2001_attacks
Offline 
Send Email