Webfairy, does the port and starboard engines enter the tower at the same
time? They seem to. This means that the plane was parallel to the side of
the tower. Considering it was banked to the left - if it was parallel I
wonder how easy this was and how easy to get the approach right.

Take a look at both engines. The starboard engine seems to explode outward
whereas after a small explosion of the port engine it disppears inward. May
be it is due to the particular structure impacted.

The "pod" seems to give off a small explosion but much smaller than the port
engine explosion. Do you notice that white (hot?) piece that suddenly
appears near the corner of the tower which then burns up all by itself.

If that was a part of the plane which just burned up all by itself then
apply that to "flight 77" and no wonder there was nothing left of it to be
seen.

As you say, the whole plane disappears inside before it then decides to emit
the cloud of smoke, with only a little red flame, along its full width. And
then the full works comes out the adjacent side.

Here is the amazing thing. If the plane was parallel to the side of the
building (shown by the same moment of impact of the two engines then how
could it also be approaching diagonally to have sent a ball of flame out the
adjacent side. This is the same concept as the hole in the C-ring which some
folk believe gives the flight path of "flight 77" (the 50 degree angle to
the wall - approach).

If it was parallel to the side of the building wouldn't you expect the
plane/ball of flame to have stayed within the confines of the tower?
Particularly if the plane stayed intact (it did upon entry) - what could
have come out on the adjacent side that contained so much explosive
material? Is that one wing load of jet fuel?

That piece of debris which burns up all by itself may account for the
absence of "77" so what other material burns up without much outside help?
White phosphorus? (It catches fire spontaneously in air, burning to P4O10,
often misnamed as phosphorus - White phosphorus is used in military
applications as incendiary bombs, smoke pots, smoke bombs and tracer
bullets.)

What do you guys think?

Phosphorus skinned flying whatsits.

That would answer the absence of 757 debris at the Pentagon, and even
perhaps the blue tarpaulined wing-like shape which is about the only thing
that is possibly of a 757, that is, if one forgets how light it is, weight
wise.



----- Original Message -----
From: "The Webfairy" <webfairy@...>
To: <Global_Media_Lightning_Headlines@yahoogroups.com>;
<APFN-1@yahoogroups.com>; "Concerned Citizens of Planet Earth"
<planehuggers@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 5:16 PM
Subject: [planehuggers] Re: [GMLH] [Fwd: The UA175 Hologram Unmasked]


> This video is not "fuzzy."
> This is what I call "the vanishment."
> It is visable on all of the videos of alleged Flight 175.
> This particular flash has scooted the frames to keep the tail in the
> same place while the vanishment happens.
> I call this particular video "The Ghostplane" since it vanishes into the
> building "like a bad special effect."
> http://www.thewebfairy.com/911/2hit/ghostplane.htm
> Also peculiar is the fact that the explosion on the other side of the
> building happens BEFORE the explosion at the alleged impact.
> A flash of what a REAL Boeing looks like is at
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/flyingpig
> A slideshow of stills of the Ghostplane video is available
> From appearance to "impact"
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/slideshow/noplane2
> From flashframe thru vanishment and explosion
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/slideshow/2explosion
>
> On all other videos I've found of airplanes crashing, the fireball
> begins within 2 frames of touching a hard surface.(1/15th of a second or
> less) The Ghostplane footage takes nearly 40 frames to manage this.
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane/crashflash/crashflash.htm
>
> The same folks who want you to believe two bullets in the head makes a
> suicide wants you to believe in vanishing planes and invisable planes
> with interchangable wings and engines.
> What is visable in slow motion is "Ungrounded theories and
> disinformation" according to the Supposed Alleged 911 Truth movement.
>
> Vicky Davis wrote:
>
> >Does anybody know what the distance is between the nose and the engines
on the airplanes that are supposed to have flown into the WTC? In this
image, it looks to me like the engines disappear with no apparent damage
where they would have entered the building. It is hard to see because it is
fuzzy... but I swear it looks like they just dissolve.
> >
> >The Webfairy <webfairy@...> wrote:
> >
> >-------- Original Message --------
> >Subject: The UA175 Hologram Unmasked
> >Date: 17 Dec 2004 09:20 GMT
> >From: StefanGrossmann@... (Stefan Grossmann)
> >
> >
> >
> >Please review the following flash object from the end of the German web
> >site, with two white arrows added for those who are slow to comprehend.
> >It is taken from an "authentic" CNN (authentic - CNN - haha!) video
> >documentary of the 9-11 horror events: the "plane" (haha!) entering the
> >steel-column wall of South Tower. This flick shows us, highlighted by
> >the two added white arrows, some of the most compelling video evidence
> >that, during the so-called "crash" of South Tower "plane":
> >- there was no shock vibration whatsoever in the plane's wing tips,
> >- the distance between the right wing tip and the tip of the right tail
> >winglet
> > remained unchanged by any crunch-up during the so-called impact -
> >there was no
> > crunch-up because the "plane" the CNN and other fakers showed on TV is
> >a military
> > hologram camouflage like developed for the Iraq war since the 1980s.
> >
> >Click link:
> >http://nineeleven2001.t35.com/images/ua175-10.swf
> >
> >The video clip presents to us extremely clear indicators that the skin
> >(wings, outer parts) of the "plane" were virtual not real. Confirming
> >the hologram theory. It was the Pentagon's missiles that hit the three
> >buildings on 9-11-1, and crafty story-tellers built an "Osama" lie story
> >around the artificial terror scenario of the U.S. wretch government of
> >terror and lies.
> >
> >Don't fall for the lie - topple the U.S. terror regime by spreading this
> >truth to at least ten (-1-) of your friends and family, asking them to
> >do the same, their recipients again to do the same etc. in a huge
> >world-wide chain of Bush-fucking 911 Truth!
> >
> >S. G.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> 911 The Ultimate Conspiracy
> http://thewebfairy.com/911
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/planehuggers/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> planehuggers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>