AS soon as we speed up the video, what looked like helicopters is now
flitting around like UAVs.
Flashes and explosions become coherent.

There is a lot of 911 footage suffering "lazy smoke."
WE didn't think much of it because the lazy smoke footage was the same
as 911 Eyewitness, which we accepted as reliable.

But when footage looks more realistic at 400% duh, it was cheezed, and
Rick Siegel was just another cheezer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhFYAZbsPM4
http://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/blogs/911-eyewitness-footage-was



toooldforthis21 wrote:
> Well spotted Webfairy. The videos ran slow.
>
> The media running their video slower indicates preknowledge that the action
would be fast. If the viewer couldn't see anything or the media couldn't display
anything because it was too damn fast then planes could not have been put
forward as the attackers. The irony is that the speed of "175" has been a major
issue in the debate.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>