|
The difference is very clear. Ponomariov knows he will not beat Kasparov. They are not in the same league, at least not now. Therefore, he wants to secure a maximum amount of money while trying to get as much advantage as possible (draw odds). He wants 60% guaranteed to 40% for Kasparov. This were the official words from Ponomariov from Corus. He is simply a knockout champion, not a World Champion. Let him win something real before making absurd demands.
In Polgar's case, FIDE went back on their own rules by not offering the minimum prize funds of a mere $200,000 comparing to millions for the men. In addition, FIDE waited almost 3 years before they even paid attention to a rematch for Xie Jun and Polgar. Is it unreasonable to ask to defend your title a few months after giving birth, so that Polgar can recuperate properly?
Let's not compare apples and oranges. FIDE violated many of their own rules. FIDE won in court in her lawsuit. She was 100% right and let's give her the credit for having the courage to stand up to the big bad FIDE. She is now representing the US. Let's support her properly, shall we?
TMH
In a message dated 1/21/2003 6:21:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, yvzvw@... writes:
> ----
> Did YOU ever have a problem with FIDE'S 1999 defaults?
>
> Also, some of us with longer memories recall your
> non-existent outrage over how FIDE treated other people, like Polgar.
I am asking for consistency in *their* positions. I believe my position has been consistent.
ECJ
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
fide-chess-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
|
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
Send Email
