Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
dqn-list · DragonQuest Newsletter List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 2136 - 2165 of 3340   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
2136
I think everyone covered the usual options. Most of your weapon options are covered in the rules under section 29. Bronze weapons, and when they can afford ...
Phil Wright
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2005
4:45 am
2137
While 12.3 says, "If the figure has no prepared weapon, it is equal to his modified Agility+Perception.", is not a prepared spell a weapon? Granted most...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 11, 2005
8:13 pm
2138
... While the DQ definition of "weapon" is pretty broad (broad enough to include breath weapons, for example; see Section 20), I don't think it should include...
D. Cameron King
monarchy2000@...
Send Email
Jun 12, 2005
12:56 am
2139
I don't have IV for spell casting. I literally interpret 27.8, "It takes one pulse to prepare a spell as part of the Tactical Procedure and another full Pulse...
Jeffery K. McGonagill
arielifan
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2005
3:52 am
2140
never been a great fan of the unengaged v engaged and other artificial intitiative quirks. we just play Init=d10+PC+mod AG+ranks in Mil Sci+rank of whatever...
Davis, John R
jrr_talking
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2005
10:45 am
2141
... So with the realism argument then in your campaigns any fighter hit by a fire spell is automatically taken from the fight as it would be impossible for...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2005
9:17 pm
2142
... That certainly seems to imply that spellcasting goes off at the end of the pulse. Though why they wouldn't have more simply and explicitly stated that...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2005
9:51 pm
2143
... Of course. Nothing in [12.3] says you have to *use* your prepared weapon. ... I am (or at least was, when I actually played DQ). Read the first two ...
D. Cameron King
monarchy2000@...
Send Email
Jun 12, 2005
11:18 pm
2144
... I've never worried about it. Players never had a problem with spells going off at the same time. ~Jeffery~...
Jeffery K. McGonagill
arielifan
Offline Send Email
Jun 13, 2005
3:59 am
2145
I think it is a valid question. Is this coming up often? Or is it hypothetical? I like your solution in either case. JohnC...
J. Corey
jcorey30
Offline Send Email
Jun 13, 2005
7:17 am
2146
For our campaigns, mages did need IV, but only against other spells. We did all attacks first and then spells went off. Mage's IVs were only used to ...
Mark D
shadow_weaver13
Offline Send Email
Jun 13, 2005
2:15 pm
2147
... I think it is pretty clear that the intent of [12.3] is for the IV to be that of the "weapon" you intend to use. That would be called exploiting a...
Phil Wright
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 13, 2005
11:23 pm
2148
Often? Definitely not but when it does come up it is usually at one of those critical turning points. If the player gets the spell off before the bad guy then ...
Phil Wright
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 13, 2005
11:49 pm
2149
... I had considered MD as well as MA but in the end went with mAG just to keep things simple. ... Thought about that as well but once again went for simple. ...
Phil Wright
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 14, 2005
12:08 am
2150
... Actually, it just raises another question: "Is a prepared spell an 'instrument'?" I think the better conclusion is that no, it is not, and therefore it is...
D. Cameron King
monarchy2000@...
Send Email
Jun 14, 2005
4:00 pm
2151
Hi, people... ... In our group we use the spell casting as a pass action. If the magic user is not engaged, he looses the spell when his side acts as...
Arturo Algueiro Melo
aleam00
Offline Send Email
Jun 14, 2005
6:20 pm
2152
... See, to me, the use of 'instrument' extends the definition to include more nebulous constructs like spells. It is fairly common in literature to use a...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 15, 2005
3:36 am
2153
... I think you're probably right. IMO, the DQ's handling of Skills was one of the worst areas of the game--perhaps even the only one that needed significant...
D. Cameron King
monarchy2000@...
Send Email
Jun 15, 2005
5:30 pm
2154
... Sometimes simple is best. We, however, use a bloated Hog of a rules system with so many house rules the game is mainly similar to DQ in magic colleges, ...
Mark D
shadow_weaver13
Offline Send Email
Jun 15, 2005
7:17 pm
2155
... Yeah. [83.1] says that adventurers have 50% higher stats which would give you a 10 for the average joe. While David Ritchie was working at TSR he...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 15, 2005
9:35 pm
2156
I'll be heading to the Origins gaming convention in Columbus, Ohio at the end of the month, and was wondering if anyone else on this list was going. There are...
Deven
dawaverly
Offline Send Email
Jun 16, 2005
2:18 am
2157
Cool. Glad to hear of interest in cons. I can't say when il ever b able 2 go 2 another convention for sure (busy: work, etc) but il try 2 get to GenConSoCal. ...
Greg Walters
itbg4000bc
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2005
2:41 pm
2158
... at the ... going. ... That would be fun. Haven't been to an Origins in almost 20 years though. Phil...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2005
4:48 pm
2159
Under [6.3] you have a table of experience multipliers for the various races. The relevant paragraph is: "When a character gains proficiency in an ability, it...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2005
5:10 pm
2160
We realy never questined the race's multipliers just because the advantages you have with anything different than a Human. Did you considerate that? Not just...
gmartinez@...
Satch_the_Great
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2005
6:25 pm
2161
... I believe you misunderstood the point. I wasn't questioning whether or not the Exp. Multiplier was justified or not. Just whether or not others had seen...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2005
10:20 pm
2162
... In our campaign the only query on this is whether it should still be there after 10 or 12 years of playing. Because we have such a large group and constant...
Mandos Mitchinson
mandos@...
Send Email
Jun 18, 2005
11:03 pm
2163
... I believe the multiplier is intended to apply to any expenditure of EP; effectively, (most) non-human races earn EP at a slower rate than humans. In our...
D. Cameron King
monarchy2000@...
Send Email
Jun 19, 2005
3:36 pm
2164
... While the idea that there needed to be something to balance out the benefits from being another race is good I've never been real happy with the...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 19, 2005
5:16 pm
2165
... That's an interesting idea. Avoids the whole players forgetting to apply the modifier thing. But as a player there would be this psychological effect of...
darkislephil
Offline Send Email
Jun 19, 2005
6:08 pm
Messages 2136 - 2165 of 3340   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help