Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
DBMMlist

Group Information

  • Members: 1528
  • Category: Wargaming
  • Founded: Dec 12, 2003
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Visit the Groups blog for the latest Yahoo! Groups information

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

4 New Members - 241 New Messages - New Questions

Description

For discussion of DBMM ancient wargaming rules. DBMM rules, lists, tactics, events, miniatures and military history are all acceptable topics. Comparisons/reviews of and comments about other rulesets are NOT acceptable.

FAQS and official errata can be found at www.dbmm.org.uk
Other Good DBMM sites are:-
DBMM Player's Handbook
The DBMM Forum

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
(Group by Topic)
Advanced
   Start Topic
Re: First Playtest of 1.1
... From: Steve Burt On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:54 PM, raybriggswargames ... Did you remember: -1 PIP to march into contact march moves <400p from enemy can
Posted - Thu Nov 26, 2009 3:34 am
Geoff Pearson
gpearsuk
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: First Playtest of 1.1
Perhaps not, but the tests I ran, (admittedly in isolation) following the change to +2 were still dodgy, as I didn't go to a 2 rank deep formation. I guess my
Posted - Thu Nov 26, 2009 3:01 am
Doug Melville
dmelville64
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: First Playtest of 1.1
I do like the idea of playing on a -b-i-g- table. Given we don't have ball rooms, the only way to do this would be to fiddle the scales, or provide optional
Posted - Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:40 am
lau_hohlong
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: First Play test of 1.1
I agree, - and the basis for this is generally argued to be their inconsistency with Roman accounts.. Personally, I think you need to compare them all and draw
Posted - Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:59 pm
Doug Melville
dmelville64
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: IV-19 Tarascan or Toltec Chichimec
Andrew skribis; ... Yes. But possibly not for the whole period (1168 AD to 1521 AD). Aztec's start 1325 AD, so any upgrade to Bd(F) should start about then.
Posted - Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:27 pm
GARVEY John
platypus01au
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Add DBMMlist to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

What is Yahoo! Answers?

Yahoo! Answers, a new Yahoo! community, is a question and answer exchange where the world gathers to share what they know...and make each other's day. People can ask questions on any topic, and help others out by answering their questions.

What is Yahoo! Answers?

Yahoo! Answers, a new Yahoo! community, is a question and answer exchange where the world gathers to share what they know...and make each other's day. People can ask questions on any topic, and help others out by answering their questions.

Questions in Games & Recreation

  • Questions are currently unavailable.

Want to help answer other questions? Go to Yahoo! Answers

Group Email Addresses


Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help