From what I have read on the thread, two idea struck me as neat. 1, allow a number of re-rolls across the game (one per action) for a newbie. A James says,...
In einer eMail vom 01.12.2007 07:10:06 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt bramjakins2003@...: The shields are wrong and only a few have bowcases at...
Jer That gave me the most laughs I have had all week. Had to explain to my wife why I was laughing out loud, touch difficult in front of my teenage daughter...
... entire ... called DBA. ... Phil does seem to agree with you, which is why the 4th rank of Pk is a - 1 and most elements only die in 1 rank, in DBMM. Great...
Probably for Jer. In the UK there is a radio quiz show called 'I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue'. One round involves censoring songs that might offend public taste...
Dave / Neels, I am with you. When I started, I wanted a LIMP or Patsy army in a hurry but could not find one, so ended up with EIR (lucky for me it turns...
Larry Due to unreasonable things such as work getting in the way, not had time to look. This a link to a list on Mr Porter's wonderful site. Not saying any...
Steve - Yes, Phil used lots of really good ideas for DBMM. But then he piled a bunch of really dumb ones atop them, never really considered the impact any of...
At a compettion today the umpire ruled against me on a point re the above which i believe was wrong. In essence my opponent had a single column of knights all...
Your understanding of the rule is certainly the same one as in the US. For whatever that is worth. Marc ... When the chips are down The buffalo is empty...
Marc Crotteau
babyshark@...
Dec 1, 2007 8:39 pm
180378
Yes John, you're right - but it is a classic mistake that the umpire made (honest but not infalible etc). The relevant text is a bit obtuse and was put into...
... I'm ... of ... represents ... Hi gang< I've often thought as Larry does here. That DBm never got itself sorted about ranks of elements fighting. One of...
Hi All just finalising my thoughts on using the new DBM(M) Bk3 lists with DBM and I came across a doozie. The official conversion notes for DBM provided in...
Hi ... support. ... the ... parts ... to ... I can see where you're coming from on this _but_ I think that one of the few decisions open to a classical general...
... errata) Actually now that I've read the list-notes this seems to be a deliberate lack of Bg. Any thoughts on how we should treat such a list under DBM for ...
The key to the rule is that a column pays an extra PIP if any element deviates from straight ahead unless it is FOLLOWING another element. The first element of...
Rob I agree that it is obtuse. Sorry but both you and John are wrong. While you might be right about the intent of the rule, as it is written the English of...
OK, let's go thorough it in detail: +1 If a single element or group move on land, but not a halt, includes any irregulars except light troops or cavalry, {in...
No it doesn't Larry, That was under V2.1 not 3.x. If the front element goes straight ahead it is 1 PIP, if the front element deviates it's 2. Hammy ... From:...
Rob, There are a couple of other problems with the conversion notes: The Late T'ang list includes an option for 12-24 WWg (I) - these can't very well be...
IMHO, the umpire ruled incorrectly. The column contains irregulars and also an element not following another deviated from straight ahead. This amuses me...
James Originally when I read the rule, I agreed with your interpretation but was pursuaded that the English as written meant that the umpire was correct. I...
... You were right - the important fact is that the group contained Irr Kn and one of the groups elements was deviating. I'm amazed that this one still crops...
... True that if the front element moves straight and back ones deviate it is 1 PIP. However, that is an exception. That is the meaning of the word "unless"...
... Wow, the simple conversion Rob had anticipated now seems all from simple. The new life that DBMM lists are supposed to breath into DBM doesn't seem all...