From: siathedgecroft@... ... Hello Simon, There is no "gag" restriction placed on any of the IWF council members, on the contrary they are required to...
Don't really want to get into this discussion too far. Just an observation that decisions made in isolation sometimes do not reflect the actual desires of the...
Hi Two questions that someone out there might be able to answer: Q1) Lets say 4 deep Wb(o) are contacted frontally by a Reg Kn(O). Another Reg Kn(o) contacts...
Hi Scott. 1) If it's the second Kn's front edge (as opposed to side edge) that contacts Wb 3 and 4, then it does count as an overlap. So the combat would be 4...
Hi Mate Yep, that's what we, (the Umpire and I) thought, and how it was ruled. Yes, the Kn was in front edge to flank edge contact in Q1. Thanks for confirming...
Hi Gary I think not. BTW, off this topic, I got a 6-4 win over Jason this arvo,.. Cheers Scott ... that ... support ... contacted ... of ... enemy ... PIPs. ...
Hi someone asked for this info. Here is what we have so far: Location: Cannes, French Riviera Dates etc: The event will be co-located with the Festival ...
... Hi John I don't really know the history of this rule as it existed long before I arrived in the IWF. I do know that there has been some noises about...
Duncan, Thanks again :-). One more thing: how long would the spearmens spears be? 8-9 feet I would guess, but would this be OK? Nick ... suggestions ... the ...
Ah - my answer to 1) was based on 3.1. In 3.0, Wb 3 and 4 don't support against the Kn attacking frontally, so they turn to face the Kn which hits them in the...
Hi Again Yes, the questions were asked in a "3.1 context". Just in regards to Q2; the DB BwX/S "X" are hit in FLANK, by the Irr Bd(f) "A", then Irr Bd(f) "B"...
Ummmmm,... Weird, the Blade(f) "B" should be SIDE-BY-SIDE Bd(f) "A". ... Irr ... not ... pips? ... QK, ... rear ... the ... 2 ... Reg ... 3 ... all. ... must...
As I read it (open to correction if there's another bit of 3.1 I've missed), Blade B could not move to that position if Blade A weren't there, as it would be...
It seems to differ what "acceptable terrain" is. At IWF I was told by two different players that in the one case, if the crest wasn't down the middle it wasn't...
... No he doesn't - at least not as a "DBM CinC". Not in the translation I am using anyway. ... Too broad IMO to draw these conclusions. ... He was the feudal...
As long as the leg is more than 100p across along its entire length and ends in a rounded edge then that will be legal. Drew ... <snip> ... I agree that a...
Hi, In Italy we were in favour of the decision of alternating the competition. First, I am convinced that making the IWF World comp more rare will increase (!)...
I think that the following mechanistic definition is covers the rules in their entirety: A piece of terrain is legal if and only if it could be drawn by a ...
... Does "rorty" mean "cheesey", "beardy", "gamey", "technically legal but against the spirit of the rules"? In which country(s) is this expression used? ...
... Luke, You seem to have the same (or at least very similar) translation that I was able to find on-line. IMO one sentence in the text you've quoted speaks ...
... This would work. The line running off the side of the hill (from previous examples) would then need to be 100p wide from the spot where it left the hill...
Guys, If I take the Heerban as Irr Bd (X) do I have to downgrade them to Hd (o) after 1320? The list does state that after 1320 ALL Heerban Spear must be ...
... No. ... Bd are not Sp. ... No. Repeating, Bd are not Sp. ... No. Heerban is up to 1/3 Ps(O), remainder Sp(I) or Bd(X). It is not all Sp or all Bd....
... Sorry - but to break with tradition this actually wasn't intended as a joke comment. Regional annual events WILL lead to there being more large,...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
