... that ... <BJ> why shouldn't knights be mobile while in column? I don't understand the reasoning, why should a column of Khotan heavy cavalry be slower than...
My reply to your e-mail was bounced. The answer is, I think, to make public the link to the PDF but make it clear that it is not guaranteed to exactly concord...
... tidy ... <BJ> bollocks john, Irr kn are not penalised at all if in column and marching for a third fourth or even sixth time that bound, this acted as a...
The discussion is not necessarily closed. However, I reserve the right not to reply to any posts on this list, particularly if they go over old ground. As the...
... I really cannot see why this amendment should make any difference to your desire to put Irr Kn (F) in column. By moving in column: - they get an extra 1...
... and ... acted ... to ... promptly ... I ... times, ... their ... IMHO, ... guys ... No need to be vulgar, old chap. Columns of knights manoeuvring all over...
Hello dbmlist, Some of you may have wondered why shortly after Richard posts a new Word version of the amendments I post saying that the pdf revision...
... to ... will ... Why ... efficient. Richard, this is my first direct exchange with you, and before I start I would like to say that I am so pleased that you...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the dbmlist group. File : /3.1 amendments...
dbmlist@yahoogroups.com
Jan 1, 2005 11:51 am
137151
Hello Richard, ... It appears we are fated. ... Done. -- Kind regards Martin Stephenson Vexillia: Wargames Miniatures & Accessories Fax: 07092 089 784 Web:...
... wrote: I am sorry that you don't like the march move PIP changes. However, they do not make manoeuvring or redeployment impossible, they just make it a...
... the ... till ... reveal ... where ... too, ... Neither Alexander nor Hannibal manoeuvred during a battle to anything like the extent possible in DBM 3.0. ...
I must say I am very encouraged by the proposals for a 3.1 edition. I haven't had time to read many posts but for what its worth here are a few of changes I'd...
Richard - I suggest a simple change to correct what I now think of as the "Barnet flaw" (see Slingshot 234, page 30): say that recoiling elements "may" pass...
[Mike Bennett] "PRESSING FORWARD I saw a strange situation where if the skirmishers did not start parallel to the formed group, then press forward becomes very...
Hello Richard, ... -- Pdf version now updated and available at http://tinyurl.com/4mck7 Kind regards Martin Stephenson Vexillia: Wargames Miniatures &...
Hello dbmlist, Have I got this right: an inability to recoil from shooting doesn't destroy a pushed back element but an inability to recoil from combat...
... the ... I assume you mean instead of the pikes getting +1 for 4th rank. (Otherwise it makes pikes too good - they are already getting several boosts in...
... I think you will have to explain further what you mean by this. Pushed back (as opposed to recoiling) elements are only destroyed if the recoiling element...
Can we moderate the language in posts please. My 9 year nephew has found a couple pretty funny recently. I'm pretty sure his mother is not going to agree.... ...
Hello Richard, ... I was trying to encapsulate the effects of recoils on pushed back elements and the difference between combat and shooting push backs. ...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
