Gentlemen, ... And in what way arent leidang vikings, if I may ask? Best Regards, Andreas -- I had forgotten that! My mind has an amazing capacity to protect...
IMHO, and it's often only mine, unless you have Shp(I) within your command you cannot deploy baggage on a WW. The lists for each army clearly state what each...
... elements ... If I ... enemy ... that ... that it ... Why? It's not in contact with the defending element surely? ... directions. I ... attacking ... ...
... the El. ... may think ... Cv. ... Thanks. So Cv and Kn will cost 2. However Kn and LH still only costs 1 because the short moving troops are Light? Rgds ...
... The pedant in me would like to point out that a WW is good going and you can deploy Bg in contact with a WW. Therefore the only reason you can't deploy Bg...
One of the figures out of 8 in Esses 15mm MER36a from the figures not in the catalogue has a lance. There helmets are small basinetts like Ponters or Agincour....
... This true. ... This is false. There is Bg there to put down, so it can't be lost. ... No they don't. ... And if a command need not have any Bg (this...
... and ... you ... In contact with it not on it. But I think Luke has answered the question as a completely waterborne command need not have baggage and...
... one ... entirely ... exist. ... it ... some ... If the ... deployed as ... the ... their ... your ... entirely ... chooses ... provide ... While not...
... <graham.briggs@b...> ... deploy ... Being sat on something is definitely in contact with it. They are touching and each edge and corner is touching the...
... wrote: snip ... that ... It's too much to hope that the rules actually refer to commands that are _initially_ entirely waterbourne (as presumably...
... the defender is not destroyed as it would normally be if caught in an L. That bullet refers to elements dying (or rather not dying) in a ZOD, not to the...
... are _initially_ entirely waterbourne (as presumably intended)? I understood the baggage was presumed to be in the holds of the Naval, after all the fleet...
Yep I am in then. I confirmed with Pat last night and we are going to make it. Mike cant make it. Brad ... good to see you and Pat on the tables again. Is...
... I believe that they do. I have always ruled the way that Luke described. From Johnathan's original post: "The Army List books say, 'All armies must also...
... That is correct. ... Absolutely. But, note that if a command is entirely waterborne it does not have to deploy its baggage IAW rule book 1. In otherwords,...
... The best way to visualize this is to do so w/o the fortification in place. In such a situation it is clear that an element caught in an L is in contact...
... that ... an L. ... ZOD, not ... is, ... in ... would ... element ... Steve I think the nub of it is your statement "Elements fighting over a TF fight as if...
... No! The elements *are* in contact, but across fortifications. It is not one bit important whether the fortifications are present or not when determining...
... over ... rules - ... a ... there's ... not one bit important whether the fortifications are present or not when determining contact between the two...
Time to register is now, Space is limited. DBM Tournament to held at ATC. The tournament will be held on Saturday, September 11th at 10:00 AM. ATC is being...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
