----- Original Message -----

From: Gary Archer

To: cy6@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:15 AM

Subject: [cy6] Re: Ju-88

Will you upload it so we can have a crack at it too ?

Gary

--- In cy6@yahoogroups.com, "Phil D'Amato" <phil4411@...> wrote:
>
> Alvin,
>
> I am specifically looking at the Ju-88C. A situation occurred in the play test for my Save the Bismarck scenario that I am running at Historicon.
>
> Phil
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alvin Gunkel
> To: cy6@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 5:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [cy6] Re: Ju-88
>
>
>
>
>
> Note that the rules only provide specifications for the Ju 88A. The Ju-88C and G, used as night fighters and in anti-bomber roles, had much improved performance and would likely have higher climb numbers. I believe specs for the Ju-88G will be published next week at Historicon in the 8th Air Force: Breaking the Luftwaffe Scenario book.
>
>
>
> Alvin
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2009, at 16:16 , skirmishcampaigns wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Split-S yes, Immelmanns no. See p.14 B3.14.
>
> --- In cy6@yahoogroups.com, "pdamato" <phil4411@> wrote:
> >
> > Can an unloaded Ju-88 do special maneuvers like Split S or Immelmanns?
> >
>