Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ct-striker · Classic Traveller Striker
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 2337 - 2366 of 2492   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
2337
After recently looking at a sci-fi website it struck me that for some reason people are convinced that there will be leg infantry in the future. Leg infantry...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 10, 2009
11:34 am
2338
... Environment and terrain chiefly, just like it has always been and imo always will be. The death of the infantry has long been argued as inevitable, I don't...
far_trader_mail
Offline Send Email
Mar 10, 2009
4:02 pm
2339
... . In the news, the pictures of patrols in Iraq and Afghanistan still show grunts walking around a hummer. I am no expert, but even in an age of stealth...
atpollard
Offline Send Email
Mar 10, 2009
4:42 pm
2340
Hi Dan, It seems to me that it is often difficult to detach ourselves from the present to think about the future. Environment and terrain are not going to...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 11, 2009
10:43 pm
2341
But this is now Arthur, and the need to hold ground is only that time between conducting movement. There is no equilibrium to be reached between systems...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 11, 2009
11:06 pm
2342
IMO, the future of infantry is Battledress. You have your mobility and endurance, but you also have ground-holding. Are grav-belters infantry or air-force?...
icosahedron152
Offline Send Email
Mar 12, 2009
10:01 am
2343
Seems like there are considerations that have not yet been addressed in this thread.   Moving military forces, of any kind, is known as power projection. ...
Richard Cox
whtwlf77
Offline Send Email
Mar 12, 2009
3:48 pm
2344
I may have misunderstood whether Arthur was referring to Traveller or war as a 'game'. However, if there is no need to hold positions because everyone is...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 13, 2009
12:06 am
2345
Hi Richard, Some good points made, but I note you are very 'attack' focused in your appraisal of the use of Infantry. Truth is as the attacking arm of any ...
Matt Stevens
matt_hg
Offline Send Email
Mar 13, 2009
3:20 am
2346
Sure, most planets will have local grunts for defensive purposes.  My focus was more on the types of units that would be utilized for what are commonly...
Richard Cox
whtwlf77
Offline Send Email
Mar 13, 2009
5:22 am
2347
Another question is what do you want to do with the territory when you've won it? If all 'your' people are in orbit and all 'their' people are on the surface,...
icosahedron152
Offline Send Email
Mar 13, 2009
6:42 am
2348
... I got beaten to it, your approach at managing the planet strikes at the very heart of why you invaded. Its unlikely you will achieve your goals by...
Matt Stevens
matt_hg
Offline Send Email
Mar 13, 2009
11:13 am
2349
Lots of variables here.  My focus has been on the tactical issues, you're talking about the strategic stuff.   My closest historical example would be England...
Richard Cox
whtwlf77
Offline Send Email
Mar 14, 2009
4:49 am
2350
I figure my reply to the other poster addressed your first note.   As far as special ops troops used for "guard duty" being no longer worthy of the name, I'll...
Richard Cox
whtwlf77
Offline Send Email
Mar 14, 2009
5:09 am
2351
Matt, With all due respect it is not the "Infantry's primary job is to take & hold ground." It is true that infantry is the only combat arm that can hold a...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 14, 2009
8:53 am
2352
Any planet that had grunts for defensive purposes would also have the knowledge that the best form of defence is attack :) Ultimately one does not wipe out a...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2009
3:51 am
2353
But those are called security personnel, not combat infantry. Even where they are nominally 'troops' like the Wehrmacht security divisions, all they do is...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2009
4:05 am
2354
And as I see it by extension and infantry that become guard/security personnel are no longer worthy of being called infantry either. Regardless of uniforms and...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2009
4:09 am
2355
Rick, I never thought of NATO ready forces as being on guard duty in Germany. The US troops were there to provide a capability, not to restrain German...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2009
6:49 am
2356
What's in a name? I agree that in future warfare 'infantry' will be motorised. However, the usage of terms like 'motorised infantry' is only necessary to...
icosahedron152
Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2009
8:59 am
2357
Hi Greg Been an interesting thread so far, if somehwat positional in places. I have to return to the first entry though and ensure that it is clearly stated...
Mark Hannam
markhannam45
Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2009
3:35 pm
2358
Greg,   Guard duty implies defending or securing something.  NATO forces in Europe during the Cold War were definitely guarding against Warsaw Pact moves to...
Richard Cox
whtwlf77
Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2009
4:18 pm
2359
I agree, but dispersion in the age of precision targeting looses meaning also. I can see the individual soldier packing his/her own ECM package :) Dispersion...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 16, 2009
11:05 pm
2360
Mark, you are right. I do not want to get into semantics. Particularly since the K'kree are all 'cavalry' :) Yes Traveller is a game of science fiction, but...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 16, 2009
11:28 pm
2361
Hmmm, I don't like to argue with those that have been there done that, but my guess is that the Regiment's artillery would have had maps of the other side, and...
Greg
surprisemove
Offline Send Email
Mar 16, 2009
11:57 pm
2362
Time for some education it would seem.   1) The 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment at the time was basically a heavy brigade.  In other words roughly 1/3 of a...
Richard Cox
whtwlf77
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2009
5:52 am
2363
"I see no value for "leg infantry" in our current reality. Too slow, unable to carry enough logistics for modern combat, too easy to by-pass, and too fragile....
Jake
jakecaro_79932
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2009
3:51 pm
2364
Thanks for making most of my point Jake.  ;-)   Mech Infantry/serious combined arms, yes.  Pure "leg infantry" no.  Leg, to me means they have no integral...
Richard Cox
whtwlf77
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2009
7:09 pm
2365
1) What is there worth fighting over? Especially in a future-time scenario? People, resources Michael Brown mwsaber6@msn From: Richard Cox Sent: Tuesday,...
Michael
saber366
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2009
7:49 pm
2366
Actually the 82nd, the 101st, the 173rd BCT, and several more IBCTs are all what you describe as Leg Infantry, not even enough wheels to move the unit. And we...
Jake
jakecaro_79932
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2009
9:03 pm
Messages 2337 - 2366 of 2492   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help