Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
carnageandglory2 · Carnage and Glory 2
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 346 - 375 of 695   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
346
Nigel, In the Crimean game we played. Had a question come up over a unit in company column advancing through a walled field. This unit was fired on from the...
Stephen Staniforth
rejectfrom60s
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2007
8:28 pm
347
Stephen, This is an interesting question. To keep it simple, I'd recommend that if the troops are not positioned directly behind the obstacle they do not...
nigelpmarsh
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2007
6:18 pm
348
Nigel: I have run across two possible conflicting rules references and I hope that you can clarify them. I have both the ACW and Napoleonic C&GII sets and the...
Frank
celestial_se...
Offline Send Email
Jul 8, 2007
1:12 am
349
Frank, A unit will 'refuse a flank' typically on two occasions, firstly, to protect itself against a charge/attack threat against an exposed flank, and...
nigelpmarsh
Offline Send Email
Jul 9, 2007
5:24 pm
350
Nigel: Thank you for the elabortations. Regards, Frank ... to protect itself against a ... protect it's flank against ... charging/attacking unit will ... gain...
Frank
celestial_se...
Offline Send Email
Jul 9, 2007
6:38 pm
351
Last night I ran a fairly large ACW game of McLaws attack on the Peach Orchard on the 2nd day of Gettysburg. It was the first time I had really run an ACW game...
scoted01
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2007
4:21 pm
352
I think this has been mentioned before but are there any plans (even if they are a long way off) to do a C17th version of the rules? I think they would suit...
Mark Sims
crusaderminis
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2007
12:10 pm
353
Dear Mark: Although Nigel will give you the official reply, I agree with you that C&G for ECW would be a good fit. But, in all fairness, I think C&G works well...
Frank Luberti
fplb02
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2007
6:13 pm
354
Our group here in the midwest would love to have C&G cover this period and we have numerous armies to cover any playtesting that needs to be done, I'm sure...
scoted01
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2007
7:33 pm
355
Ed, Our wargaming group is doing the first day at Gettysburgh and we also had the problem with the artillery destroying everything in sight. I had some input...
Don
empiredon65
Offline Send Email
Jul 20, 2007
3:06 pm
356
I appreciate the feedback, something I'll look to experiment with in my next game. A couple of other thoughts I had: Counter battery fire seems relatively...
scoted01
Offline Send Email
Jul 20, 2007
4:46 pm
357
Hey guys, Finding this string of comments on acw artillery pretty interesting. Can't say I have had similar experiences playing this system with folks here in...
Stephen Staniforth
rejectfrom60s
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2007
9:49 pm
358
I'm using historical OB's so Union typically 6 guns, all the same, with 150 gunners, Rebs typically 4 guns, mixed batteries, 100 gunners. I usually have the...
scoted01
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2007
10:55 pm
359
Ed, You should be aware that the system already takes into account the fact that a moving target is more difficult to hit. It calculates this based on the...
nigelpmarsh
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
1:16 pm
360
"As a general comment, what most wargame tables fail to account for are the many undulations of terrain, and different features that on the real battlefield...
Mark Huml
gonatas101
Online Now Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
2:46 pm
361
Nigel, thanks for the feedback, I'll drop any idea of trying to adjust fire with move distance of the target unit. I did some some testing with the % and I...
scoted01
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
4:02 pm
362
FYI, I posted the following message to my WWI Trench Wars Yahoo group. Since additional figures have been added to the sale, you may be interested in the Flea...
fplb02
Offline Send Email
Jul 24, 2007
5:27 pm
363
Nigel, Had another game of Crimean war with the Napoleonic system today. An interesting question came up in reference to a British unit going into line. As the...
Stephen Staniforth
rejectfrom60s
Offline Send Email
Jul 29, 2007
2:17 am
364
Stephen: I am sure that Nigel will respond and explain the exact differences as the system sees them (as soon as he recovers from his Historicon hangover), but...
Thomas Cusa
cusalaw
Offline Send Email
Jul 31, 2007
2:42 pm
365
Tom, Thank you for your explanation. That seems to make sense. We had an interesting development in our Crimean game then. Based upon your explanation. Two...
Stephen Staniforth
rejectfrom60s
Offline Send Email
Jul 31, 2007
3:45 pm
366
For those who could not make it to Historicon, there are several pictures of the Carnage and Glory games that were held at the convention on the HMGS web site...
fplb02
Offline Send Email
Aug 4, 2007
8:24 pm
367
Hi all. Had another excellent FPW game with Von Moltke a couple of days ago and I have a few basic questions. 1. When a unit changes formation can it also...
mikechrismartin
Offline Send Email
Aug 13, 2007
3:12 am
368
Mike, In response to your questions: 1. The system does permit changes of facing when performing a formation change. So a unit can perform a front to flank or...
nigelpmarsh
Offline Send Email
Aug 13, 2007
10:34 pm
369
Nigel, Had an interesting scenario come along in a Crimean game we fought this past w/e. using a few alterations with the Napoleonic system. Would like your...
Stephen Staniforth
rejectfrom60s
Offline Send Email
Aug 14, 2007
7:55 pm
370
Stephen, There is a difference between a unit in open order formation and a unit in any other formation with skirmishers deployed to cover the parent unit. The...
nigelpmarsh
Offline Send Email
Aug 15, 2007
2:35 pm
371
I too am troubled by the high effectiveness of ACW artillery in C&G but what do I know about the actual effectiveness. Not much at the moment other than from...
idler203
Offline Send Email
Aug 17, 2007
8:47 am
372
I did play test using a Peach Orchard scenario and the changes I used I think worked really well, actual historic results appeared as opposed to Barksdale...
scoted01
Offline Send Email
Aug 17, 2007
2:06 pm
373
I, Good question - no ruleset can be certain of getting every facet or mechanic of combat exactly historically accurate. It has to be somewhat abstract in it's...
nigelpmarsh
Offline Send Email
Aug 17, 2007
2:55 pm
374
I like your change proposal for canister fire zones, that will impact the "Indian rush" feature which just now has very little impact against artillery as the...
scoted01
Offline Send Email
Aug 17, 2007
4:24 pm
375
hi there, first post here so be gentle!! i am considering buying a set of these rules to run on my laptop for maybe SYW or naps to build some fictitious armies...
greg_cfc
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2007
12:28 am
Messages 346 - 375 of 695   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help