I'd be very interested, but unfortunately have several commitments during the month of June; probably could not make the week in question. Dave Hanson ...
138211
boydston.brian
May 17, 2013 9:13 pm
I encourage you and your friends to simply start playing AWAW. If you've played 3R, you have the core concepts down and the transition will not be that...
138212
sparky0565@...
sparky0565
May 18, 2013 1:11 am
I have been interested in attending but I can't take vacation in June from work. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4GLTE smartphone ... From: "Elihu Feustel"...
138213
Elihu Feustel
elihu_feustel
May 18, 2013 1:33 am
I briefly had his version. It was crap, and I quickly traded it in for credit to get real games. It simply didn't compare to AWAW....
138214
ejschoenfeld
May 18, 2013 3:30 am
It's even worse than that. The "Prados" Third Reich product is not simply a reprint -- they 'fixed' the issues in 3R but did so in significantly different...
138215
andqui45
May 18, 2013 6:40 am
Is it necessary to consume oil counters from the reserve in the mapboard box to uninvert units therein? The U.S. boxes goes without saying but is an uninverted...
138216
andqui45
May 18, 2013 10:43 am
... Never mind, I found the relevant rule (33.74H)....
138217
tjjuliano
May 18, 2013 2:04 pm
Count me as a probably, depending on the week. I'm very rusty. Thomas Juliano...
138218
victor
braindama
May 21, 2013 7:47 pm
I am still a little unclear about how this works. Suppose I run a long supply line by sea touching the required port in the Pacific every 10 hexes. Fleets in...
138219
Paul
paulmilne
May 22, 2013 1:47 am
I seem to remember long discussions about WA CTL and changing it to prevent exploitations from early amphibious landings. There was talk of not allowing WA CTL...
138220
Spencer Miller
hapless13
May 22, 2013 1:51 am
Its in the next update to the rules that will be rolled out this summer (and is in the new edition rules). I do not remember the exact wording, but the idea...
138221
Paul
paulmilne
May 22, 2013 1:55 am
I looked in the proofing files that were sent out and didn't see it. Do you know where its at?...
138222
randy_scheers
May 22, 2013 2:05 am
I am not promising that this is the official version, but the latest wording I have is: 41.77 RESTRICTIONS: ... C. WESTERN ALLIED CTL RESEARCH: The Western...
138223
randy_scheers
May 22, 2013 2:05 am
... The ships can either: 1) Go back to their port of origin 2) Go back to any port within 20/10 hexes of the target port (the port receiving the supply). ...
138224
Paul
paulmilne
May 22, 2013 2:16 am
That's kinda what I thought. Certainly dampens the WA non nuke strategy which is highly dependent on CTL 3 by 1944. Oh well another possible strategy out the...
138225
Paul
paulmilne
May 22, 2013 2:22 am
That's kinda what I thought. Certainly dampens the WA non nuke strategy which is highly dependent on CTL 3 by 1944. Oh well another possible strategy out the...
138226
victor hogen
braindama
May 22, 2013 3:47 am
do they invert? Vic( if no naval combat occurs) ________________________________ From: randy_scheers <randy.scheers@...> To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com ...
138227
Spencer Miller
hapless13
May 22, 2013 3:55 am
Yes. The only exception would be units residing in the appropriate SW box which are used to escort supply. They would return to their SW box uninverted. ... ...
138228
ejschoenfeld
May 22, 2013 4:18 am
Some would say that an Allied non-nuke strategy is highly dependent on the Axis not successfully researching an A-bomb :-) In any case note that the...
138229
randy_scheers
May 22, 2013 4:53 am
I agree; if you want to get to CTL-3 in 1944 and aren't doing a nuke strategy, you need to get your 3rd Military BT in either 1943. That is expensive but...
138230
Paul
paulmilne
May 22, 2013 2:18 pm
Well a German nuke strategy is always a small possibility and threat. Certainly most Axis players don't try it (Chris Goldfarb notwithstanding). However if...
138231
randy_scheers
May 22, 2013 3:45 pm
I have never tried this strategy, so I definitely don't know all of the details. Do you free up earlier RPs (since you don't roll for CTL until 1943) that...
138232
Paul
paulmilne
May 22, 2013 9:36 pm
I have done it a couple of times. Once at the con about 5 years ago and again in a game last fall. Both times led to big victories but other things were going...
138233
boydston.brian
May 24, 2013 7:56 am
Its a done deal and here's to you for saying move on. But I agree it was not the right remedy because of how much it hampers the WA around the board. I only...
138234
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 24, 2013 1:28 pm
It was the right remedy (and was extensively discussed when implemented). The fact that it makes someone’s ahistorical “perfect plan” more difficult was...
138235
Paul
paulmilne
May 24, 2013 5:22 pm
First of all it was never presented as a "perfect plan", but as an alternative strategy that certainly had its pitfalls and risks. I only made my last post...
138236
Paul
paulmilne
1:07 am
First of all it was never presented as a "perfect plan", but as an alternative strategy that certainly had its pitfalls and risks. I only made my last post...
138237
Paul
paulmilne
1:09 am
sorry I have no idea why this was sent again....
138238
boydston.brian
6:36 am
I agree. I certainly appreciate the need to quash the ahistorical early WA invasion of France, but I think this limits the WA too much elsewhere and mandates...
138239
Rob Carl
robcarl1020
9:10 am
Hey All I totally agree that the CTL change can lead to problems. I'm in a game now that my opponent could've pulled back a few hexes in N. Africa (winter...
