Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 875
  • Category: Wargaming
  • Founded: Oct 19, 1998
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 9047 - 9076 of 138248   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand Author Sort by Date ^
9047 gw2k-owner@xxxxxxx.xxx Send Email Jan 1, 2000
8:30 am
GLOBAL WAR 2000 MAILING LIST INFO List/Website Administrator: Rob Ryder Email: gw2k-owner@onelist.com A3R Website: http://www.a3r.com GW2K List Website:...
9048 GregSonia8@xxx.xxx Send Email Jan 1, 2000
6:31 pm
I have been finishing the proof of the 12-12--99 rule update and corresponding with Bruce. He said that when he finishes sometime today, he will send you the...
9049 kozan@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx...
kozan@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx... Send Email
Jan 1, 2000
10:09 pm
... Let me rephrase the question: What is the CVE/ASW ration when there are no defending ASW or CVES and there are attacking submarines? Cheers! Kozan...
9050 Scott C. Davies
scdavies@xxxx.xxxx Send Email
Jan 1, 2000
10:12 pm
Infinity to one! ... From: Ali Kozan Soykal [mailto:kozan@...] Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 2:09 PM To: gw2k@onelist.com Subject: [gw2k] ReCVE...
9051 bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 1, 2000
11:10 pm
I thought I had posted an answer to this question. The defender incurs the adverse -2 modifier. ... Bruce Harper...
9052 Scott C. Davies
scdavies@xxxx.xxxx Send Email
Jan 2, 2000
1:55 am
Bruce, I believe he's asking for the ratio, not the DRM on this one... Scott Davies ... From: Bruce Harper [mailto:bruce_h@...] Sent: Saturday, January...
9053 bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 2, 2000
8:42 am
Yes, but I can't think of any reason why anyone would ask about the ratio if they didn't want to know the modifier (which is based on the ratio). And the ratio...
9054 GregSonia8@xxx.xxx Send Email Jan 2, 2000
7:32 pm
Should the Indiana be in Winter and Alabama be in Summer on the naval construction charts? Or was this issue dropped afterall for the time being, awaiting...
9055 bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 2, 2000
8:49 pm
This was dropped for now, since I didn't feel there was a really satisfactory analysis or concensus as to what's going on with the USN. It wasn't...
9056 Larry Torrance
gwgamer@xxxxxxx.xxxx Send Email
Jan 2, 2000
9:32 pm
There is a descrepancy in the rules regarding the Air Range results and their effect upon the interception of Raiders. The 1/1/00 version of the rules (Rule...
9057 GregSonia8@xxx.xxx Send Email Jan 3, 2000
12:00 am
In a message dated 1/2/00 3:32:55 PM Central Standard Time, gwgamer@... writes: You probably have an older version of the new update. Bruce sent a...
9058 bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 3, 2000
2:38 am
You are assuming that the Allies get an Air Range modifier in 1940, which may not be the case. You are also assuming that the British build a sixth CVL in Fall...
9059 WMOODEY@xxx.xxx Send Email Jan 3, 2000
2:46 am
Bruce why would the cvl be inverted. I thought units built are only inverted if they SR. Since carriers count if they are adjacent to the shipping area why...
9060 bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 3, 2000
5:55 am
I think you're right, because the CVL doesn't have to get into the shipping area. My mistake. I don't know if Britain would always build the CVL, but that's...
9061 Larry Torrance
gwgamer@xxxxxxx.xxxx Send Email
Jan 3, 2000
7:19 am
Bruce, I think it is very realistic for the WA to get an Air Range result in 1940. This has happened in each of my last three games. Plus, in almost every ...
9062 GregSonia8@xxx.xxx Send Email Jan 3, 2000
7:49 am
In a message dated 1/2/00 8:38:15 PM Central Standard Time, bruce_h@... writes: I think it best to ask our naval historian to confirm this. It may well...
9063 Francis.Timothy
Francis.Timothy@xxx.x... Send Email
Jan 3, 2000
3:10 pm
These are only British merchant ships, but that is appropriate for 1939-42. Source: *British Vessels lost at sea 1939-45* (London: HMSO, 1947): Appendix B. ...
9064 Greg Wilson
GregLWilson@xxxxxxxx.... Send Email
Jan 3, 2000
3:15 pm
Another important point that should be made is that the vast majority of these Raider losses reported below were not from Raiding Capital ships, but rather...
9065 bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 3, 2000
3:38 pm
As I tried to make clear in my last posting, I don't find such anecdotal evidence helpful. How many RPs did the Western Allies put in Air Range? In ASW? Did...
9066 Francis.Timothy
Francis.Timothy@xxx.x... Send Email
Jan 3, 2000
3:49 pm
Two other notes. The figures in parenthesis are in gross tons. The raider % of that is 8.8% (i.e. they sank larger than average ships)....
9067 bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 3, 2000
4:29 pm
Do we figures just for the Atlantic, as opposed to the Med as well? ... Bruce Harper...
9068 Francis.Timothy
Francis.Timothy@xxx.x... Send Email
Jan 3, 2000
4:42 pm
These are for all British registry merchant ships, so it includes Med, Indian Ocean, Pacific, etc. You have to keep in mind, therefore, that the Dec 1941+...
9069 CroweMike@xxx.xxx Send Email Jan 3, 2000
4:46 pm
In a message dated 12/28/1999 8:31:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, bruce_h@... writes: << I hate to rain on the latest runaway bandwagon, but I have yet to...
9070 CroweMike@xxx.xxx Send Email Jan 3, 2000
4:59 pm
In a message dated 12/29/1999 11:51:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, bruce_h@... writes: << From: bruce_h@... (Bruce Harper) People were generally in...
9071 bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 4, 2000
2:01 am
I don't disagree with you, but it sure shouldn't take 15 minutes to find where the Air Nationality DRMs are - more like 15 seconds! You might be taking some...
9072 bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 4, 2000
2:06 am
It sounds to me like you *are* quite aware of how to exploit a heavy British commitment to France! This is exactly the refutation I would be afraid of for...
9073 GregSonia8@xxx.xxx Send Email Jan 4, 2000
3:49 am
I missed one eratta. I must have glossed over this as I obvoiusly understood what you intended to say. 75.56 ATTACK ON PARIS: C. Axis air units which commit...
9074 Michael Stone
71051.1037@xxxxxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 4, 2000
7:06 am
... Actually, the correct answer is "To Infinity and Beyond..." [copyright Buzz Lightyear] :^)...
9075 Michael Stone
71051.1037@xxxxxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 4, 2000
7:06 am
... It seemed to me that the news was that they were both started after Fa39 so they shouldn't be on the At Start forces. Add them to the ship counter file...
9076 Michael Stone
71051.1037@xxxxxxxxxx... Send Email
Jan 4, 2000
7:06 am
... British ... Brits ... was ... No. The British NAF modifier was adopted to reflect the gross disparity in performance & capability between Swordfish...
Messages 9047 - 9076 of 138248   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help