Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 87583 - 87612 of 119758   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
87583
Here are my thoughts on Russia: 1. There are several possibilities under the current rules: a. Axis players are playing badly and complaining about nothing. b....
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
9:39 am
87584
... wrote: Bruce I don't agree with you. In historical terms in the Fall 41 the movement was restricted but it was German movement. Their supply was slowed...
krisdziku
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
12:14 pm
87585
... One or two forts. One fort in 41 (for Leningrad) if Russia misses the BT in 1940, 1 fort each in 40 and 41 if Russia makes the BT in 1940. The second...
ejschoenfeld
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
1:06 pm
87586
... Not much to say about points 1 through 3. You know best what you need to see to say there is aproblem, and I can't argue agaisnt treating...
ejschoenfeld
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
1:15 pm
87587
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the aworldatwar group. File : /1941...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
1:30 pm
87588
I think 3 hits the nail on the head. Currently, I don't think average play scores the Germans a playable position in 1941 that approaches the historical...
Eric Thobaben
ericthobaben
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
1:45 pm
87589
All I believe the answer is a combation of #1a and#1b. No changes are necessary ... The reverse is true as well: sub-optimal Russian play will result in a ...
William Steiner
williamstein...
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
1:46 pm
87590
... A good point, but please consider also that Russia is by no means guaranteed the necessary breakthrough in military general, If the dice are unkind we...
Markus Kässbohrer
markus9k
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
2:02 pm
87591
... If it is any help (probably not, perhaps the opposite) I am initially enthusiastic about this idea... The Russians started defending hard in Fall 41...
Markus Kässbohrer
markus9k
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
2:03 pm
87592
... infantry on the ... This is correct. In a prior post I said I might try a Barbarossa giving the Russians a -1 DM for all infantry in the Summer turn. I ...
Joseph Brophy
brophysr
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
2:15 pm
87593
I consider myself a decent AWAW player. I believe Mark Yeager to be a competent AWAW player. I cannot see how to break the Russian defense with a normal ...
Jim Sparks
sparky0565
Online Now Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
3:55 pm
87594
I would ask to the designers to wait a little before make big changes in Russia. More playtesting will hurt nobody but changes made with out enough reflexion...
Alber
alber_cl
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
4:21 pm
87595
... German conquored neither of these historically, so you are right on the bell curve there. German never got to the Iranian border, so you are above the...
bbrophy75
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
4:27 pm
87596
Thank you for complimenting me on my tactics. Unfortunately, it is 1941 that needs to be fixed not 1943. I think Mark wants to draw me deeper into Russia. He ...
Jim Sparks
sparky0565
Online Now Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
5:05 pm
87597
how about just mandating the historical orders of Stalin in summer 41: namely "All units will attack, no retreat. ... From: "Jim Sparks" <sparky0565@...>...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
5:33 pm
87598
how did you cut grants through Siberia to russia? ... From: "Jim Sparks" <sparky0565@...> To: <aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, October 01,...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
5:39 pm
87599
I'd like to propose a novel way of implementing Russian unpreparedness that I believe adds a degree of uncertainty to each first turn Russian invasion attack,...
Horacio Ureta
haureta@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
7:13 pm
87600
... Then Russia should not surrender. In fact, given this player dynamic, Russia should be - as the USSR did historically - pushing Germany back in 1943. From...
DonMoody
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
8:20 pm
87601
... IMO, a Russian surrender should be an uncommon event. ... You know my opinion on this (grossly ahistorical option, shouldn't even be in the game). DonMoody...
DonMoody
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
8:28 pm
87602
... I was going to post on this aspect in more depth but Joe has already stated it. Eventually, the various Russian options - under the wide variety of ...
DonMoody
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
8:40 pm
87603
"A World at War" MAILING LIST INFO List/Website Administrator: Paul Stoecker Email: aworldatwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Official AWAW Website:...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:44 pm
87604
Greetings! This monthly information message for the "A World At War" mailing lists explains the: QUESTION & ANSWER PROTOCOL How do I ask a question? a. Check...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:49 pm
87605
I don't know whether Don is agreeing with Joe ("the German player is going to get skunked most of the time") or not. I haven't found very many posts on this...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:57 pm
87606
The Axis are doing well because I own all of Europe except Ireland, England, Turkey, and Sweden. I am now losing Norway. BTW Saudi Arabia is neutral. Russia...
Jim Sparks
sparky0565
Online Now Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
12:14 am
87607
I invaded Dutch harbor. ... === message truncated === __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com...
Jim Sparks
sparky0565
Online Now Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
1:43 am
87608
My question concerns the "occupation policies" research results where a major power can construct one factor per turn and defer construction to build a larger...
William Humphrey
wm_humphrey
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
2:00 am
87609
this cuts grants to 5 still, and will be much harder with new invasion rules in Pacific. ... From: "Jim Sparks" <sparky0565@...> To:...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
2:44 am
87610
Don, this is not complete story, is it? what did Germany have to give up to get its 2x5-6 and 4 airborne etc? Is getting these units historical? it is going...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
4:29 am
87611
From USAT +1 If the Western Allies are unable to rebuild all transports lost in the current game turn. From the record sheets 8. If 10 or more Western Allied...
Sean McKenzie
em_gale
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
6:34 am
87612
... what did Germany have to give up to get its 2x5-6 and 4 airborne etc? Is getting these units historical? it is going to pay someplace else. See my comments...
DonMoody
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
6:41 am
Messages 87583 - 87612 of 119758   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help