In the real war, Britain had a lot of small, slow carriers that don't have counters in the game (because they were too small and too slow to qualify as CVLs). ...
I agree the rule is very clear and well written. The points made in the post still stand however, but I don't think it's worth arguing about since the impact...
84872
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Aug 1, 2005 2:44 pm
The only reason to allow NAS to get off a carrier after it base changes is because it makes sense to allow NAS to get *on* a carrier after it base changes. For...
84873
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Aug 1, 2005 3:26 pm
I've deleted this thread. I couldn't figure out whether there was anything to it, but less a rule change. People can raise it again for the August changes if...
I think the main way in which getting off carriers after base change can be used is if you want to use your NAS offensively in one place and defensively in...
It was pointed out that Malta ferrying missions were mostly AAF and that the CV's used are too small and slow to be represented in the game. Thus they can be...
"rediculous" Sorry, I haven't been watching the posts that closely lately. Have we introduced new terminology. Is that a new word for a communist arguing the...
Sean, Maybe a real-life example would help... In a current game of mine the 1 Japanese sub in Spring of 1942 ran against my ZERO Allied ASW in the Pacific Box...
Not really. A single AAF factor represents over 100 planes. The British never ferried that many aircraft in a single mission. And the carriers that were...
... Precisely. In fact the land based hurricanes that Britain flew off the carriers had to be loaded onto the carriers like cargo. Also, many of the plane...
... no Allied controlled ports ... base changes to. ... Please show me a real war carrier ferry to Malta that *must* be done in the movement phase in order to...
... AAF, ... Thr US also had a few small vessels at the start of the war which ferried aircraft but were not powerful enough to be considered light carriers....
84883
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Aug 1, 2005 10:21 pm
Greetings! This monthly information message for the "A World At War" mailing lists explains the: QUESTION & ANSWER PROTOCOL How do I ask a question? a. Check...
84884
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Aug 1, 2005 10:21 pm
"A World at War" MAILING LIST INFO List/Website Administrator: Paul Stoecker Email: aworldatwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Official AWAW Website:...
I will be at the Convetion Tuesday - Friday. I will leave Tueday afternoon, picking up Eric Scheulin, returning Friday afternoon or evening. I have a room at...
Hi Japan wants to protect sea supply to Lae with both onboard units and units in the SW box. Are the ships in the SW box added to those already escorting sea ...
... I believe that each TF forms a group and all of the non-TFs combine to form a group. So if you have a 2 TFs or a TF and a group with less than 10 FF, you...
I agree with Randy. At first I thought that you had to assign the "carrying" CG as the one with the required destroyer or transport. But after perusing the...
Hi, I was wondering if the -1 DM applies to Russian ground units attacked by Airborne drop. If so, would the unit suffer the -1 DM if attacked by both Airborne...
The Russian units would not be subject to a -1 DM if they were airdropped upon and attacked by German units that conducted an overrun. The easiest way to...
with latest updates, I can no longer move a naval unit around in the shipyard boxes. All i get is a popup with an error message. Is anyone else having this...
I looked at the rule a little bit more and I see two problems with it. 1) The rule allows NAS to be used twice in one turn. They can be used for counter air...
not necessarily; but your way of stopping it was what I was referring to. Probably easier ways of preventing double use if we think it is a problem. ... From:...
... ... I would prefer this: D. If inverted naval air units are transferred to an uninverted carrier, the carrier becomes inverted. If uninverted naval air...
