Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 83573 - 83602 of 119762   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
83573
My recollection(s) as well. Eric Laner Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:06:16 -0400 From: "Eric Scheulin" <scheulin@...> Subject: Re: Re: Initial Set-Up -...
Eric Laner
ericlaner13
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
9:00 am
83574
How does one get Australian units to Malaya, Singapore or Burma as is permitted in the chart I cannot post here? India is not a permitted location for...
Jeff Nader
realmong2003
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
9:44 am
83575
... I do not think this is a good presumption. With regards to the Pacific theater, Australia is neutral until Britain and Japan are at war. DonMoody...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
10:15 am
83576
... targetting for submarines. ... out up to 3 attacks in any port on the Pacific front. ... This is incorrect. The target base must be within 10 hexes of a...
ejschoenfeld
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
11:53 am
83577
Maurice is correct in that a sub in the Pacific (or Atlantic) SW box is sufficient for a harbor attack on the Pacific (or west) front. I think the simplest way...
Eric Thobaben
ericthobaben
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
12:27 pm
83578
The custom has been to do an updated PDF of the rules on December 31 and June 30 of each year, so that's when the "convention rules" will be in PDF form. I...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
12:35 pm
83579
Does the below rule include Bessarabia even if the Bessarabian hexes are controlled by Russia on the turn of the Axis DoW? I have a vague memory of such being...
Mark Yaeger
myaegergw2k
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
1:29 pm
83580
Here are the applicable rules. I think the answer is "yes" - otherwise there wouldn't be any point to the rule. I will insert a reference to 82.323 in the RGT...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
1:42 pm
83581
Bruce ... I was just going to say that :) Mark...
Mark Yaeger
myaegergw2k
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
1:56 pm
83582
Instead of a cross-reference, I just substituted the more detailed wording from rule 82: Restrictions on Axis attacks from Rumania During the movement and...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
2:05 pm
83583
Very specific question in relation to Russian Suprise rule and the -1 DM on the Barbarossa turn... trying to set up the defense still... Russians have units in...
Mark Yaeger
myaegergw2k
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
2:53 pm
83584
From Eric S. reposted by me his opponent David M. I didn't see an answer to this question. Question: May an Air Transport redeployment Mission be flown after...
nestle1166
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
3:51 pm
83585
... It is based upon the unit(s) making the attack. Did at least one of the attacking units not need an overrun to do what it is doing? In your example, the...
DonMoody
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
3:56 pm
83586
I would say yes based on the rules you cite below. This surprised me a little (I didn't think it was supposed to work this way), but the rules below would...
Eric Thobaben
ericthobaben
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
4:29 pm
83587
Eric: air is not going to help vs subs ... From: "Eric Thobaben" <thobaben@...> To: <aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 8:27...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
4:36 pm
83588
Ed: this is not the way things should work> First, as Eric has confirmed, range has nothing to do with attacks from teh Pacific SW box. Second, you think best...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
4:47 pm
83589
Hi USA sub in Pacific SW box does an harbor attack against Rabaul Sub can attack two targets. In Rabaul are 2 Japanese TFs and a BB4 outside the TFs. According...
balzak88
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
5:18 pm
83590
Yes, I realized this a few hours after my last post. My mistake. A C-I result is probably your best bet. Eric Thobaben ... From: Maurice Miskow Eric: air is...
Eric Thobaben
ericthobaben
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
5:36 pm
83591
... from teh ... Yes that is right. I mistakenly thought you were referring to on board factors (although on re-reading it is quite clrear that you were not)....
ejschoenfeld
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
6:32 pm
83592
... is yes. BUT ... is no. DonMoody...
DonMoody
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
7:00 pm
83593
Greetings! This monthly information message for the "A World At War" mailing lists explains the: QUESTION & ANSWER PROTOCOL How do I ask a question? a. Check...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
7:18 pm
83594
"A World at War" MAILING LIST INFO List/Website Administrator: Paul Stoecker Email: aworldatwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Official AWAW Website:...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
7:18 pm
83595
... and it isn't possible to target BB4 which is outside TFs, since only TFs can be selected? raf...
balzak88
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
7:34 pm
83596
Sorry, did not introduce myself. I'm Dan Long, and I think we met and I think we met at one of the Cons. I was in the First Gulf War, and my family and I wish...
dtiberius2003
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
7:57 pm
83597
sorry, but with the recent changes in Japanese transport rules, Japan must place more RP's in transport production and does not have RP's to waste on Harbor...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
8:52 pm
83598
... Japan must ... waste on ... require 2 BT's ... are only ... all naval ... Since there is no date or time restriction on Japan placing rps in Harbor attack...
ejschoenfeld
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
9:02 pm
83599
unfortunately by 45.53 only Japanese CI's can be used to defend against attacks vs it, not German ones. So far only advice is for Japan to place RP's in CI and...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
9:04 pm
83600
Ed: You are also forgetting the other positive mods that apply to Harbor Attacks: namely, sub, torpedo and ASW results as well as tactics cards. Of these, who...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
9:26 pm
83601
Don, your second answer is mute since Harbor Attack research results can be accumulated, but only 1 used in any attack. ... From: "DonMoody"...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
9:27 pm
83602
I have always assumed (and played) that the RGT becomes meaningless once Russia and Germany are at war. Whatever the RGT was at the moment of a DoW by Germany...
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2005
9:34 pm
Messages 83573 - 83602 of 119762   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help