Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 80459 - 80488 of 119755   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
80459
European scenario using playtest rules 17 november. December 2004 - Mars 2005 Axis: Adrian Clemente Allies: Alberto Clemente Fall 1939 ... Diplomacy: Axis...
Alber
alber_cl
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
9:57 am
80460
... I am curious about this. First, in Europe, creating a breakthrough in a mountain hex means the movement factor of each armor unit which exploits from the ...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
11:54 am
80461
Greetings! This monthly information message for the "A World At War" mailing lists explains the: QUESTION & ANSWER PROTOCOL How do I ask a question? a. Check...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
1:07 pm
80462
"A World at War" MAILING LIST INFO List/Website Administrator: Paul Stoecker Email: aworldatwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Official AWAW Website:...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
1:07 pm
80463
... Interesting report. Thanks for posting. ... Technically, Rumania renounced its claim when its army left. From 66.25: "If Rumania does not have any units in...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
2:08 pm
80464
You're right, we did something wrong. I think we forgot than overruning an armor requires 4 movements. We knew that exploiting armor would move only 5 factors....
Alber
alber_cl
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
5:28 pm
80465
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the aworldatwar group. File : /!Playtest...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
6:28 pm
80466
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the aworldatwar group. File : /!Playtest...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
6:28 pm
80467
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the aworldatwar group. File : /!Playtest...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
6:30 pm
80468
Hi Situation: Russia has annexed and garrisons all Bessarabian hexes, Germany DoW's and overruns Russian 1-3 in mountain hex R35 with 2 armor units + air from...
balzak88
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
11:04 pm
80469
... Were these units ever in Rumania? The answer to your question is the opposite of the answer to the above question. DonMoody...
DonMoody
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
11:12 pm
80470
... above ... they were not in Rumania at start of movement phase, but they are in Rumania at start of combat phase Is hex R35 in Bessarabia considered part of...
balzak88
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
11:27 pm
80471
I think Bruce is changing wording of this rule (see below), although I do not think it clearly answers this either. But I do not think Bessarabia is part of...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2005
11:35 pm
80472
[Don Moody wrote:] ... Why is that? Won't the tensions be: Fall 1939: +1 Turn +1 Two powers at war with Germany +1 German Eastern front offensive -1 Russian...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
2:56 am
80473
FWIW, while I think Tim's interpretation is certainly more difficult to implement, it is the one I use. Eric Laner From: "Tim Schroeder" <nt2peter3@...> ...
Eric Laner
ericlaner13
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
3:28 am
80474
I don't see how it's even possible. ... From: Eric Laner [mailto:Eric_Laner@...] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 7:32 PM To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com ...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
3:42 am
80475
Well, I have decided to commit some time from my daily routine to gaming. It's been way too long. The last game I played was with Bruce against Don Moody and...
Chris Goldfarb
chris_goldfarb
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
4:24 am
80476
Welcome back, Chris! ... "Best" depends upon what you want to try. If you want to test different parts of the system then scenarios give you a taste of the...
Dave Hanson
dchanson@...
Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
5:43 am
80477
What a splendid idea, Dave - it hadn't occurred to me. Chris, why don't you join in the fray with me against the evil forces of Dave and Eric Scheulin? You'd...
Eric Thobaben
ericthobaben
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
5:50 am
80478
... forces of Dave and Eric Scheulin? This sounds great! Send me the latest turnfile, and I'll catch up on the game status offline. Thanks, Chris...
Christopher Goldfarb
chris_goldfarb
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
6:08 am
80479
And here I thought I knew about exploitation... Is the following (example) attack allowed: Germany controls all Russian hexes southwest of row 42 (incl.), the...
Henrik Schelbeck
henrikschelbeck
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
9:15 am
80480
Your armor *must* follow the pathway of controlled hexes to maintain a chain. First sentence of 16.37 states that your chain cannot be broken by advances...
Dave Hanson
dchanson@...
Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
9:29 am
80481
So the answer is it can't, right? ... From: Dave Hanson [mailto:dchanson@...] Sent: 2. april 2005 11.27 To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Subject:...
Henrik Schelbeck
henrikschelbeck
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
10:28 am
80482
... The attack is allowed, the advance after combat is not. ... What matters is not 16.36 but this portion of 16.447 ADVANCE AFTER COMBAT: "Advance after...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
10:44 am
80483
The relevent rules are _way_ at the bottom. Is the following advance allowed? (ETO hex numbers) There is a breakthrough in CC26 and two exploiters exploit to...
Donald Stanley
schtean22
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
1:44 pm
80484
... No. ... While an exploiting armour unit was eliminated, its elimination did not break the chain; however, advance after combat would break the chain. ...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
1:52 pm
80485
I (and I'm sure others) don't have a map handy, and it's not immediately obvious to me whether the exploiting armor is moving one hex or two hexes before...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
2:12 pm
80486
Thanks for the response. Suppose armour 1 exploits 2 hexes armour 2 and 3 exploit those 2 and another 2. Armour 1 attacks and is eliminated. Armour 2 and 3...
Donald Stanley
schtean22
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
4:45 pm
80487
In the research rules, it states: Japan begins with one "7+" torpedo result. In the Pacific Campaign scenario under the Japanese National Capabilities, it...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
4:53 pm
80488
This change is being made for the March updates, which are currently being proofed by Eric T, before Maurice puts them into the rules. The website should be...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 2, 2005
5:23 pm
Messages 80459 - 80488 of 119755   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help