If Jp didn't do any convoy protection research, nor put much effort in it by providing DDs etc. then this should be the baseline. In this case I see no...
... I am not sure to what 'this' refers. Some of the [oft repeated on and off this forum] basic design concepts are (not in any partiuclar order): CONCEPT ONE ...
This was discussed before but could not find answer in archives - Which if any of the following major powers can not have one sub transfer past a enemy held...
Greetings! This monthly information message for the "A World At War" mailing lists explains the: QUESTION & ANSWER PROTOCOL How do I ask a question? a. Check...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Feb 1, 2005 12:18 pm
77991
"A World at War" MAILING LIST INFO List/Website Administrator: Paul Stoecker Email: aworldatwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Official AWAW Website:...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Feb 1, 2005 12:18 pm
77992
... Thank you for including the relevant rules with your question. ... Yes. ... No. ... Both - but not both in the same turn. Again, thanks for including the...
... one ... Is there a reason (other than that the rules say so) why Irish partisans do BRP damage and Iraqi partisans don't? If there is going to be a special...
... also by direct reading of rule. ... everybody but Italy knows how to send one sub past Gib? Historically, there were Italian subs involved in the BOTA, and...
... Perhaps because the IRA, being based in Ireland and operating in "Northern Ireland" (Ulster--part of Great Britain), posed a much greater security threat...
David & Cheryl Hanson
dchanson@...
Feb 1, 2005 1:46 pm
77998
Hi Martin and welcome, I don't think you'll have much luck. AWAW rules are big and, to the best of my knowledge, there is no Spanish translation. I have news...
... I thought the revision was going to be along the lines of: 11.71 ECONOMIC EFFECT OF PARTISANS: ... Specifically: A. For each Irish partisan in or adjacent...
This assumes there is a problem at all, which at present means assuming that one gaming group knows more than everyone else. I can't change rules based on...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2005 2:14 pm
78001
This so confused me I'm not even sure what the rule is any more. ... From: David & Cheryl Hanson [mailto:dchanson@...] Sent: Tuesday, February 01,...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2005 2:24 pm
78002
Years ago someone said they were going to translate the rules into Spanish. I don't think they ever did, though. ... From: rubenberrozpe...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2005 2:24 pm
78003
There are two options for dealing with the confusion about partisans: OPTION 1 (listing the exceptions): 11.71 ECONOMIC EFFECT OF PARTISANS: For each...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2005 2:42 pm
78004
Either way is fine (although I generally favor simplicity). I trust your judgment. This is a minor issue. There are other areas in the rules that would need...
I think only the scorched earth rule and maybe something in Persia in rule 40 and 80-something. ... From: Eric Thobaben [mailto:thobaben@...] Sent:...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2005 3:05 pm
78006
Can anyone post the figures for an American Pacific submarine campaign, in the same format as commonly used to post BotA results? This would include the...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2005 3:07 pm
78007
Yep. Eric Thobaben ... From: Bruce Harper [mailto:bruce54321@...] I think only the scorched earth rule and maybe something in Persia in rule 40 and...
... There is this option (which is simpler than either of the others): 11.71 ECONOMIC EFFECT OF PARTISANS: ... Specifically: A. For each Irish partisan in or...
It is not simpler than the others (because it is simpler to say all partisans cause BRP losses, period), nor does it cover all the situations which have been...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2005 3:29 pm
78010
... The wording suggested is less revision. The wording suggested has no repercussions through any other rules. Combined, doesn't this meet the criteria of...
It just seems IMHO that Partisan's/Terrorists cost BRP's just by being there. Their is just too many parallels in modern life to say they don't. I like Option...
No. ... From: DonMoody [mailto:donmoody@...] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:34 AM To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [aworldatwar] Re:...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2005 3:52 pm
78013
Russian partisans could only be constructed in Kamchatka if Japan somehow controlled it. Partisans in Spanish Morocco seem quite realistic to me, and since...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2005 3:53 pm
78014
... You must be using a new definition of 'simpler' I was previous unaware of. DonMoody...
I favor option 2. Simple is better, plus it gives the Axis the ability to cause a modicum of the pain that the Allied partisans can cause. Mike C....
mcrowe@...
Feb 1, 2005 4:02 pm
78016
Just two more possible ways of tweaking pto sw. 1) Decrease Japan's started ASW tech. This can be done in two ways. Either give Japan -1 asw tech to start or ...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
