looks good, +5 brps /year is my vote,max 25. Bill...
638
William F Steiner
110652.1220@xxxxxxxxx...
Dec 1, 1998 2:52 pm
... raider ... I believe this is a good question. In the Portland playtest game Mike counteraired the British air in fall 1940, threatened invasion (thus ...
639
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
Dec 1, 1998 3:29 pm
I am about to finalize the diplomatic tables. What was the consensus (if any) about the Spanish diplomatic table and the establishment of Vichy? 1. Add a +1 if...
640
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
Dec 1, 1998 3:30 pm
This was a little terse. Do you mean for Russia as well, so new Russian ICs aren't as good as they are now? ... Bruce Harper...
641
Conrad Struckman
71163.401@xxxxxxxxxx....
Dec 1, 1998 3:42 pm
Bruce, Let me get this straight: We keep BRPs in Third Reich because without them - it wouldn't be Third Reich. But we implemented ICs in A3R for Russia only ...
642
Mike Crowe
73140.247@xxxxxxxxxx....
Dec 1, 1998 4:37 pm
The rule for resolving damage during light combat seems a bit difficult to follow, given the confusion expressed to date. Would a player aid for this help?...
643
Mike Crowe
73140.247@xxxxxxxxxx....
Dec 1, 1998 4:52 pm
I'm not sure this would get used much more than the 1 RP = 5 BRPs idea. 1 RP is really equivalent to almost 10 BRPs, if you look at what it costs to convert 3...
644
Mike Crowe
73140.247@xxxxxxxxxx....
Dec 1, 1998 4:52 pm
Leave it as is. Mike Crowe...
645
William Kohler
William_Kohler@xxxxxx...
Dec 1, 1998 4:57 pm
I agree that this option would add interesting possibilities to Japan's situation. The U.S. is another matter: it already is an enormous economic power, whose...
646
Mike Crowe
73140.247@xxxxxxxxxx....
Dec 1, 1998 5:19 pm
Questions on SW 1. Can subs ONLY enter the SW box via SR? The only rule I can find that explicitly discusses moving submarines into an SW box is 25.12, which...
647
DonMoody
donmoody@xxxxxx.xxxx
Dec 1, 1998 5:25 pm
I say either delete it or change it to 1 RP is a 5 BRP increase in BRP Base. This would give it the same effect for protecting against Base reduction while...
648
DonMoody
donmoody@xxxxxx.xxxx
Dec 1, 1998 5:24 pm
I don't remember any consensus being reached. Either leave it for now or reopen the debate. I remember a few other additions/changes than these in the...
649
Ernie Copley
ecopley1@xxxxx.xx.xxxx
Dec 1, 1998 7:47 pm
FWIW, I think it's a nice touch, having IC's for other powers besides Russia. I can't imagine ever using an RP to buy 5 BRP's - not enough bang for the RP...
650
Johan Mellbourn
johanm@...
Dec 1, 1998 7:55 pm
I vote for (1) eliminate the BRP option. Without having an clue of how GS economics work, I believe consistency between GS and GW is very important. If you...
651
Johan Mellbourn
johanm@...
Dec 1, 1998 7:58 pm
I am completely new to this list so I am unaware of what subjects that have been discussed and finished. Is there any kind of compilation anywhere so that I...
652
Robert L Ryder
rlr@...
Dec 1, 1998 7:56 pm
I'd say scrap the RPs for BRPs all together. Also, we have ICs for Russia because we need them to be mobile. I don't think they're needed for any other...
653
Ernie Copley
ecopley1@...
Dec 1, 1998 8:02 pm
I've never understood why the existence of Vichy annoys Franco. And since the rationale for the original modifier isn't at all clear to me, I guess I vote to...
654
Hans Rahmqvist
hanra185@...
Dec 1, 1998 8:11 pm
... Yes, at www.onelist.com. If you choose 'find list' and search for 'gw2k' you find this list, and the click the 'digest archives' (or whatever it's ...
655
R. Farley
farls@...
Dec 1, 1998 8:16 pm
I agree. IC's for all countries is way too complicated. Robert M. Farley University of Washington Department of Political Science ...
656
R. Farley
farls@...
Dec 1, 1998 8:17 pm
Franco sought to annex some French colonies. The existence of even a rump French government prevented this. Robert M. Farley University of Washington ...
657
ILLUIAN@...
Dec 1, 1998 8:58 pm
In a message dated 12/1/98 9:03:46 AM Pacific Standard Time, William_Kohler@... writes: << We might limit ICs to countries with on-map placement...
658
Salvatore_B
Salvatore_B@...
Dec 1, 1998 9:28 pm
i wonder why A3R doesn't start "historically", with all countries neutral, then Germany gets a free(*) DoW on Poland and a free(*) offensive in the Axis Fa39...
659
Robert L Ryder
rlr@...
Dec 1, 1998 9:25 pm
... When you say "originally developed" do you mean original 3R? Research wasn't didn't exist as a game element back then. I always took the BRP to represent...
660
Leith.Keven@...
Dec 1, 1998 9:46 pm
Bruce included in his analysis; ... B SW combat dice roll -> 1/0 G SW combat dice roll -> 1/4 = 7 BRPs G AAF which make it through = 6 x 3 = 18 BRPs ... Air...
661
Leith.Keven@...
Dec 1, 1998 10:47 pm
Leave the rules as they are. KL...
662
bsteiner@...
Dec 1, 1998 11:40 pm
Bruce wrote: I am about to finalize the diplomatic tables. What was the consensus (if any) about the Spanish diplomatic table and the establishment of Vichy? I...
663
bsteiner@xxxxxxxxxxxx...
Dec 1, 1998 11:45 pm
Bruce Harper wrote: I think it goes without saying that no one ever uses RPs to generate BRPs. There are two possible solutions to this: 1. Abolish the use of...
664
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
Dec 2, 1998 2:36 am
... That's correct. I think we have to postulate that if there's *no* RAF anywhere to be seen, that the Germans would have a good shot at flattening London....
665
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
bruce_h@xxxxx.xxxxxxx...
Dec 2, 1998 2:37 am
... It lasted longer than I thought it would. But what about Conrad, Mike Stone and Joe Brophy? I don't think they're on the list. Shouldn't they be? ... ...
666
Greg Wilson
GregLWilson@xxxxxxxx....
Dec 2, 1998 3:52 am
Bruce, I sent this about a month ago, but I think we should disallow the strategic deployment of a nukes by subs for all the reasons I brough up below. Despite...
