Don, I don't think that there is a distinction. Oil effects are determine in all circumstance after the opportunity to add to the reserve with oil sources. I...
38734
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2002 2:52 pm
We discovered that Germany should be allowed to TR air into the Murmansk box from Oslo - something which arises out of the new SR rules. I believe the...
38735
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2002 3:00 pm
Here is another Murmansk tweak. We found that under the previous rule, Germany could put four of five air in the Murmansk box and attack round after round,...
38736
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 1, 2002 3:03 pm
What are these supposed to mean? ... From: stoeckp [mailto:stoeckp@...] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:49 AM To: gw2k@yahoogroups.com Subject: [gw2k]...
Italy is conquered in Fa42. The U.S. receives the pro-rated BRPs for Italy as a conquest in Fa42 (26 BRPs in the current playtest, reduced to 13 for ...
Several months ago I suggested clarifying the section on French BRPs as a conquest (both for clarification and reduction in words), and it was accepted. The...
... I'd prefer to get rid of this modifier altogether. Subs that attack in concert with friendly air or naval forces don't get an extra mod if the battle...
I think carrier should be vulnerable. It was a huge concern historically. So much so that sometimes the carriers were out of position because they were more...
I like this idea. ... From: Martin Smith [mailto:mcs@...] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:14 PM To: gw2k@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [gw2k] Murmansk...
... I'm just wondering how this changews anything in your situation. Since the Allies don't control ant cities in mainland Italy, they still dont get any Brps...
How does this change fit with the proposed rewrite of The main air and naval base used to oppose Murmansk convoys was Narvik, which is about 650 miles (11...
... Why is this suddenly more effective than attacks by AAF used to be? Aren't air attacks vs. the Murmansk convoy attacks against naval units at sea? If so,...
Rule 78.41 states that the Nationalist Chinese lose 5 BRPs for each objective under Japanese control. I assume that it should read "not under Nationalist ...
I still don't follow the logic of oil flow in the Mid-East. Is this correct: The WA own Mosul, and it produces oil. But that oil cannot be used locally in...
... This isn't quite right. The oil supply in the supply zone that contains Mosul is the *sum* of oil carried there by IO transports *plus* oil from Mosul....
38750
Jason Allen
chewbacca-zeus@...
Feb 1, 2002 7:12 pm
I've often thought along these very lines........I think it is a good idea. ... From: <cnksstruckman@...> To: <gw2k@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, February...
... My interpretation of the first sentence of 56.62 is that the U.S. gets the Italian conquest BRPs in Fa42 -- simply because the U.S. is the senior alliance...
... Or I did. It just seems rather odd to have the US get the Brps for a turn or so after forcing Italy to surrender by taking North Africa, Sicily and ...
38753
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 2, 2002 1:53 am
Yes. Later this year, assuming the constant haggling over the rules doesn't continue to slow us down. ... From: Jacob Melzer [mailto:jmelzer@...] ...
38754
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 2, 2002 1:59 am
Oslo is an objective. ... From: Edward John Schoenfeld [mailto:ejschoenfeld@...] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:01 AM To: gw2k@yahoogroups.com ...
38755
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Feb 2, 2002 2:05 am
I don't know whether you misunderstood the suggestions or were just in a disagreeable mood. I think you should have another look at my posting. 1. Whether the...
... What's the rationale behind the modifier? Why should friendly air give subs a bonus around Murmansk, but not, e.g., around Malta? ... If the only concern...
I had figured that with all of the discussion concerning Murmansk, that having some data about the loses incurred by the Allies and the Axis would be helpful. ...
Ed, I don't have the rules on me, but I was under the impression that once the US is in the war, they get the BRPs for any conquests made by the WA. So, if in...
... Yes they did. IIRC there were at times 20-30 subs in the Arctic, with the twin duty of protecting Norway from invasion and attacking Murmansk. ... Did...
... But they equally might not take a mainland city, in which case the US would get the BRps in (frex) fall and lose them in the the YSS. Somehow that seems...
Warning this is just chrome. In the past several list memebers have suggested that leaders be added but no workable solution has been presented. I believe I...
