GLOBAL WAR 2000 MAILING LIST INFO List/Website Administrator: Paul Stoecker Email: gw2k-owner@onelist.com A3R Website: http://www.ultraww2game.com/ GW2K List...
13955
John Stathakis
stakman@...
Apr 1, 2000 1:25 pm
Hello people, I know those who participate on this list are already playtesting, but I offer the following assistance for those who want PBEM matchups for GW2k...
13956
bruce_h@...
Apr 1, 2000 3:02 pm
I think we are already playing that you can deploy three marines to Pearl using a single transport, but perhaps not. The simplest and minimalist solution is...
13957
bruce_h@...
Apr 1, 2000 3:10 pm
I'll guess I'll have to deal with this when I haven't played until 1:00 a.m. the previous night and I'm not worried about the German U-boats... ... Bruce...
13958
Bryan, Theodore
bryant@...
Apr 1, 2000 3:12 pm
May gound units attack an empty enemy, enemy-controlled hex during the regular combat phase? During exploitation?...
13959
Michael A. Stonebraker
zephyron@...
Apr 1, 2000 3:23 pm
John, I think my other game might be dead (A196). Please re-emter me to the waiting list with the following parameters: Multi-Player game of GW2K as the...
13960
Michael A. Stonebraker
zephyron@...
Apr 1, 2000 3:37 pm
My appologies for accidentally posting this to the list. ... From: Michael A. Stonebraker <zephyron@...> To: <gw2k@onelist.com> Sent: Saturday, April 01,...
13961
Martin Smith
mcs@...
Apr 1, 2000 4:07 pm
... Well, when I wrote it I thought it was an honest question, but now I wonder whether it isn't a trick question after all. :-) The two combinations above...
13962
Martin Smith
mcs@...
Apr 1, 2000 4:55 pm
May patrolling naval units protect a sea supply line traced through the patrol hex? If so, are they inverted after they do so? Protecting supply isn't listed...
13963
dchanson@...
Apr 1, 2000 10:56 pm
Five factors per transport seems a reasonable standard. I give it a YES vote. Dave Hanson ... From: DonMoody <donmoody@...> To: GW Design Forum...
13964
Michael Stone
71051.1037@...
Apr 2, 2000 9:40 am
... I think the confusion results most often from undue reliance upon "the table" which was originally intended to merely be a playing aid but which appears to...
13965
Mark Yaeger
myaeger@...
Apr 2, 2000 12:47 pm
Martin ... As per the rule (20.551), the table, and past memory when Bruce put the table together... I think the intent of the rule/table was that the kill and...
13966
bruce_h@...
Apr 2, 2000 2:45 pm
... Only by seaborne invasion. ... No. Bruce Harper...
13967
bruce_h@...
Apr 2, 2000 3:01 pm
If you mean actually protecting the sea supply line, as opposed to counter-intercepting an enemy naval force which intercepts the sea supply line, the answer...
13968
bruce_h@...
Apr 2, 2000 3:05 pm
You raised this two years at the convention, but I did not think any of the alternatives you offered were improvements over the current rules (just the ...
13969
bruce_h@...
Apr 2, 2000 7:36 pm
Here is the latest update on the Vancouver playtest (to Summer 1942). It is a tense struggle. I will post separately on the two rule issues and suggestions...
13970
bruce_h@...
Apr 2, 2000 7:36 pm
Here is a playtest report which Boyd sent me for his current (European theater only) game in Victoria. It follow the report from which I used for our current...
13971
bruce_h@...
Apr 2, 2000 7:36 pm
Here are the BRP levels from the current Vancouver playtest game: Germany Italy Britain U.S. Russia France Japan China Start 120 40 60...
13972
bruce_h@...
Apr 2, 2000 7:36 pm
My second concern arising out of our current playtest game (and the one before it) is much simpler than the German BRP level. In both games, the Germans have...
13973
Martin Smith
mcs@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
... This sounds good to me. ... I don't like this. I'd rather get rid of reaction rolls. I don't think we need them from an historical point of view. The WA...
13974
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
13975
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
13976
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
13977
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
13978
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
13979
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
13980
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
13981
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
13982
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
13983
Free4all.com
info@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:25 pm
This an automated response to your mail to www.Free4all.com We are not able to answer your request at this moment. However, all mail is reviewed each day....
