Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 875
  • Category: Wargaming
  • Founded: Oct 19, 1998
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 134169 - 134198 of 138233   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand Author Sort by Date ^
134169 ejschoenfeld Send Email May 1, 2012
2:50 pm
This answer confused me a bit. I thought we were allowing Italian infantry in Russia to attack. Playtesters keeping track of BRPs spent on builds is a good...
134170 Bruce Harper
bruce54321@... Send Email
May 1, 2012
3:00 pm
The current package (May 1, 2012): I haven't written up the bombing restrictions yet. OVERRUNS: 1. Overruns may be conducted only by armor and mechanized...
134171 ethobaben@...
ericthobaben Send Email
May 1, 2012
5:29 pm
This is a great overall playtest package to test. I still favor the limitation on production increments for all major powers (1940: 1; 1941: 1; 1942: 2; 1943:...
134172 victor
braindama Send Email
May 1, 2012
8:20 pm
A patrol must pass thru a port every 10 hexes on its way to its patrol hex. If its patrol hex is 10 hexes from the last port, may it join with an intercepted...
134173 Mike Crowe
crowe_mike Send Email
May 1, 2012
9:10 pm
Yes. ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
134174 michaelws@...
michaelws... Send Email
May 1, 2012
9:27 pm
I only play once in a while, but... one advantage to the general limitation on production for all major powers is that it is simpler than the current proposed...
134175 Bill Moodey
wpmoodey Send Email
May 1, 2012
11:49 pm
the counter to that is that I think a lot of beleive outside of russia the high cost of the second increment is a pretty fair tradeoff.   I think its rare...
134176 Bruce Harper
bruce54321@... Send Email
May 2, 2012
4:35 am
I guess we should revisit this issue, since there seems to be quite a bit of support for it. Here is the way I wrote it up: Substantive change (June 30, 2012) ...
134177 Mark Yaeger
myaegergw2k Send Email
May 2, 2012
6:47 am
Bruce I agree it is simpler... but I am not sure... or at least not yet... I think the biggest over-production issue was re Russian ground units and we have...
134178 donmoody@...
donmoody_pro... Send Email
May 2, 2012
11:57 am
... I supported this before and still support this. DonMoody...
134179 Dave Hanson
dchanson45 Send Email
May 2, 2012
12:47 pm
Go for it Bruce.  I agree.  Production limits R us.   And the rules should also establish that "Eric Thobaben is most funnest AWAW player" Maybe...
134180 Bruce Harper
bruce54321@... Send Email
May 2, 2012
12:50 pm
Yes, Germany will only be able to produce 3 AAF before Barbarossa, rather than 6 AAF. The same would be true for Russia. Is this a bad thing? How many games...
134181 ethobaben@...
ericthobaben Send Email
May 2, 2012
1:21 pm
I support this as well. As Mark and Elihu have noted, this does curb max early production strategies. But, even as a zany AWAW strategy player, the game...
134182 balzak88 Send Email May 2, 2012
1:39 pm
... if the most funnest AWAW player says so,who are we not to believe it? If you have to build 23 CVLs to have a fun game,something is clearly missing. raf...
134183 Bruce Harper
bruce54321@... Send Email
May 2, 2012
1:42 pm
At least 7 more carriers. ... From: balzak88 To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 6:39 AM Subject: [aworldatwar] Re: Playtesters:...
134184 Bill Moodey
wpmoodey Send Email
May 2, 2012
2:03 pm
which is the maximum number of british carriers that britian could build nas for by winter 1946.  a perfect plan.  something must be done to stop this.   ...
134185 ejschoenfeld Send Email May 2, 2012
2:03 pm
Not before Japan sinks half a dozen. :=)...
134186 Mike Crowe
crowe_mike Send Email
May 2, 2012
2:28 pm
Yes. I support this for all of the reasons stated. I like the simplification, as it handles many things at one blow. Over-production in the early years causes...
134187 Bruce Harper
bruce54321@... Send Email
May 2, 2012
2:42 pm
But in what situations would the Allies every "over-produce to take the war to Germany sooner"? I can't think of any in the five affected categories: ...
134188 Bruce Harper
bruce54321@... Send Email
May 2, 2012
2:50 pm
The current package (May 2, 2012): OVERRUNS: 1. Overruns may be conducted only by armor and mechanized infantry; one unit must still be armor. Overrunning...
134189 balzak88 Send Email May 2, 2012
4:03 pm
... Well I guess we could give this perfect plan a try,since there are not many other options left to explore anyway. raf...
134190 M MISKOW
mmiskow Send Email
May 2, 2012
4:40 pm
I think this was all a joke. To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com From: gameplay2000@... Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:03:29 +0000 Subject: [aworldatwar] Re:...
134191 Mike Crowe
crowe_mike Send Email
May 2, 2012
7:57 pm
Britain could produce a 4o5 armor in 1940, and 3 air as you say. They have to get their CTL up to use a commando or paratroop. Not impossible, but not easy...
134192 David
dltred Send Email
May 2, 2012
9:02 pm
Can US put troops in US possessions before they are at war in the PTO? for ex. Wake or midway or Dutch Harbor or Pago. Also, what happens to US forces after...
134193 donmoody@...
donmoody_pro... Send Email
May 2, 2012
9:11 pm
... Only as allowed by USJT results. ... The normal rules apply. If in a port, they may be eliminated or they may not. Please review rule section 30. And note...
134194 Mark Yaeger
myaegergw2k Send Email
May 2, 2012
11:01 pm
Bruce Yes, Germany will only be able to produce 3 AAF before Barbarossa, rather than 6 AAF. The same would be true for Russia. Is this a bad thing? [ Mark] My...
134195 Paul Milne
paulmilne Send Email
May 2, 2012
11:53 pm
I think the US forces immediately die. 29.54 PACIFIC - INITIAL JAPANESE CONQUESTS: Japan gains control of all hexes in the Dutch East Indies at the end of the...
134196 boydston.brian Send Email May 3, 2012
1:03 am
I like these changes; they address these issues very elegantly. Maybe "massive" was the wrong word, but they do significantly change the way the game has been...
134197 jameshapner Send Email May 3, 2012
1:28 am
I think once upon a time there was a prewar political game under development for AWAW. If I remember correctly, it was called "Peace in Our Time". Is it still...
134198 Mike Crowe
crowe_mike Send Email
May 3, 2012
2:18 am
It is now called Gathering Storm, and is under active development. Mike ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
Messages 134169 - 134198 of 138233   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help