Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 117006 - 117035 of 119729   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
117006
Under the proposed sub/BotA package, submarines would move from (B) to (A) in 27.7221. The result is that all 1-factor naval units would use "light"...
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2009
6:42 pm
117007
My suggestion would be to add a sentence to the end of 16.61. This would be the rule that several people thought was somewhere, but which no one can find: ...
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2009
11:01 pm
117008
Thanks for collecting/posting this data, Dave. Interesting reading! Tim....
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2009
11:03 pm
117009
Does everyone agree with this? (I am starting a clean-up of the AWAW part of my e-mail backlog). ... From: Tim Schroeder To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent:...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
May 2, 2009
2:57 pm
117010
The applicable rule reads: 27.7221 DESTROYERS, CVEs, ASW AND TRANSPORTS: A. Each turn no more than half (round up) of each major power shipbuilding rate may...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
May 2, 2009
2:57 pm
117011
I favor Bill Moodey's suggestion, which I would incorporate into the test package as: 51.73 WESTERN ALLIED SURPRISE EFFECTS: The following restrictions do not...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
May 2, 2009
3:04 pm
117012
I suggest this wording: Clarification (June 30, 2009) 17.463 LIMITED TO NAVAL ATTACKS: Kamikazes may only attack enemy naval activities and naval units,...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
May 2, 2009
3:10 pm
117013
Makes sense to me. Mike. ... From: Bruce Harper To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 10:56 AM Subject: Re: [aworldatwar] Re: Oil...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
3:14 pm
117014
Agreed. Mike. ... From: Bruce Harper To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [aworldatwar] Re: pacific transports --...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
3:15 pm
117015
Looks good. Mike ... From: Bruce Harper To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [aworldatwar] Kamikaze can hit...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
3:15 pm
117016
Tor isn't coming, so perhaps Randy and I can play Chris and Bill? ... From: Mike Crowe To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 7:01 AM ...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
May 2, 2009
3:15 pm
117017
To all, Still need a few gms looking for Wargames and Euros. the focus of this great little convention is open gaming but there are some scheduled events....
Mark Ruggiero
wargamer999
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
4:09 pm
117018
I'm sorry to hear that Tor can't come. However, the long lost Keven Leith IS planning to come, all the way from Arizona. Bill and Chris have already committed...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
4:27 pm
117019
It's time to think about this year's convention! To any of you who have not attended before, the World Boardgaming Championships, held annually at Lancaster...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
4:28 pm
117020
Maybe Randy and I could play the Milnes? I think they're great opponents. ... From: Mike Crowe To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
May 2, 2009
4:38 pm
117021
since this just clarifies what i think the current rules say; however, some people think that exploiting armor should have enough oil stockpiled so that they...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
6:21 pm
117022
perhaps the title of this section can be amended to include submarines? ... From: Bruce Harper To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
6:23 pm
117023
Hey Mike, will you put Vic Hogen on the list, please? What is he, chopped liver? Joe Brophy...
Joseph Brophy
brophysr
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
7:32 pm
117024
You should reconsider this idea. This means the WA in the Pacific may only ship 2 oil in the DOW turn, unless they add 3 more transports on top of their 10. If...
Joseph Brophy
brophysr
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
7:38 pm
117025
I'm not in favor of this. I admit that I haven't been following the list as closely as of late, but Ed and I have been playing a game (beginning 7 Mar 2009)...
Eric Thobaben
ericthobaben
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
8:08 pm
117026
... I agree. ... Like Joe, I usually see **at least** 7 transports in the Pacific (when playing either side). The proposed 'easy fix' of a 'problem' (for which...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
8:09 pm
117027
Or neither. Having just played through this as the Japanese player, the WAs can't unleash terrible death or anything with 10 transports on the DoW turn. So we...
Eric Thobaben
ericthobaben
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
8:12 pm
117028
... In case I wasn't clear, no change is my preference. ... The closest thing that has been reported to the list was of the 'this is different than before'...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
8:28 pm
117029
Sure. I note I did have him on your team! Thanks for pointing out the oversight, though. Mike. ... From: Joseph Brophy To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent:...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
9:04 pm
117030
... Am am with Eric on this topic ... I for some reason I can't figure out a change really must be made, these are not changes I would prefer. The first is...
Ed Schoenfeld
ejschoenfeld
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
10:15 pm
117031
Eric: I think you have missed the main point of the complaints: by adding 10 built TR's to the Pacific as part of the BOTA changes, this has affected that...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
10:17 pm
117032
Ø The major effect seems to be that, with all those transports, the US will no longer have any oil problems, so the second strike on the oil at Pearl is a...
Goldfarb, Christopher
chris_goldfarb
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
10:22 pm
117033
as I recall, many players have 7 TR at start in Pacific, so they use 3 for oil leaving 4 for other jobs; the proposal is 10/2= 5 with 2 for oil leaving 3 for...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2009
11:02 pm
117034
I think there is no problem at all, and that the 10 WA Pacific transports are fine. I think it's actually stupid and a waste of time that the Americans have...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
May 3, 2009
12:12 am
117035
I agree with this, and have two comments to add: 1) Either the number of transports in the Pacific matter or not. If they matter (which is what people who...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2009
12:13 am
Messages 117006 - 117035 of 119729   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help