Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 114279 - 114308 of 119755   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
114279
Greetings! This monthly information message for the "A World At War" mailing lists explains the: QUESTION & ANSWER PROTOCOL How do I ask a question? a. Check...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
8:15 am
114280
To all, Complete descriptions of the 2008 AWAW Tournament games at the WBC are now available at the AWAW website (www.aworldatwar.org). Go to Player...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
3:03 pm
114281
Yes - we should start listing who's going to next year's. I am. ... From: Mike Crowe To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 7:03 AM ...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
3:58 pm
114282
"And start making plans now for next year's convention (August 3-9, 2008 in Lancaster" Uh, is that Aug 3-9 *09*? Or isn't that this past years' dates? Do...
richard kent
rkentesqva
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
4:18 pm
114283
We were discussing how many atomic BTs players normally get... Doesn't it seem like the added value of the 4th BT is higher than any other? If you get your 4th...
elihu_feustel
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
4:50 pm
114284
Uh, I meant Aug 3-9, 2009! That is for next year. Which is almost here. Mike. ... From: richard kent To: AWAW GAME Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 11:17 AM ...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
6:58 pm
114285
... This is my opinion, too. I never thought it was any other way. Tim....
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
8:11 pm
114286
I was about to answer the same way when I read this reply. I agree with Don's answer; 22.1611B says the two counter-interception missions can be intercepted...
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
8:37 pm
114287
I agree with this analysis. It does raise an interesting historical question, though. How many bombs did we produce after Little Boy and Fat Man, and how...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
8:56 pm
114288
I'm fine with this change. Makes sense to me. Mike. ... From: Tim Schroeder To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 3:10 PM Subject:...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
8:57 pm
114289
Axis minor ally Rumania surrenders after a -1 result on a Wi'43 Russian diplomatic roll. What BRP adjustments are made? Does it matter (for BRP purposes)...
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
9:42 pm
114290
... Please note there is a distinct difference between surrendering and switching sides. Your post was too long and difficult to follow but it seemed you...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
10:27 pm
114291
... I think that the 3rd BT has higher value than the 4th BT. Without a 3rd BT, you won't have an atomic program at all. ... I agree with this. Basically, to...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
10:35 pm
114292
... Could you define 'decent shot'? If you allocate 1 RP in 1939 and roll a ... ... 1, how many RPs do you allocate the 1940 YSS? ... 2, how many RPs do you...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
11:03 pm
114293
... Agreed. ... Also agreed. If the minor merely discontinues its policies, it goes back to its prior neutral state. If the result is stronger, it not only...
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
11:12 pm
114294
... This is incorrect. An associated or allied minor that "discontinues its policies" surrenders; it is out of the game (not neutral). The rules are quite...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
11:18 pm
114295
... Oh please, something like this happens almost every game. Anytime the Allies capture a non-original KEA BRP source in a Winter turn, what happens in the...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
11:24 pm
114296
... Not true. 35.64 is very clear. Read the last sentence in particular. 35.64 CONTESTED AREAS: If a minor ally capital, associated minor country capital or...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
12:06 am
114297
... If I roll a 1, I would either give up or put 3 RPs (the max) in. I am not sure I have ever had that situation. The general guideline is to get the...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
12:10 am
114298
... Apparently not. It seems even originally controlled KEAs which are liberated also work this way. DonMoody...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
12:26 am
114299
... Thanks for posting these. There are still some inaccurate statemnents regarding USAT increases after a pro-Axis US election result (e.g. the claim that it...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
12:44 am
114300
I apologize for not being able to handle this sort of discussion. Let me know if anyone thinks any actual rule rewrite is needed (I sure hope not). ... From:...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
1:56 am
114301
... On re-reading my post I came across as snippy and that wasn't my intent. Sorry. ... At one point I thought both sides could count the BRPs for some ...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
2:03 am
114302
... It was like that for years. Because the Axis *always* go first, it was originally deemed reasonable that the Allies would get to count any Winter conquests...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
2:38 am
114303
Well, this is true, but for much of the game, it is only the Axis which are taking things, and by the time the Allies are, they don't really need the BRPs. ......
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
2:49 am
114304
Well gee. I've been playing that YSS thing wrong all this time. So if I'm the Allies, and I capture Paris in winter 1943, the Axis get to count the BRPs at...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
3:44 am
114305
I  think this is the right philosophy. It means the rules should be intuitive.   Don ... From: Bruce Harper <bruce54321@...> Subject: Re: [aworldatwar]...
Don Stanley
schtean22
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
4:20 am
114306
... Agreed, although it does affect allied RPs and DPs (potentially) which matter throughout the game. In any case, I don't think it is a problem as long as we...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
4:53 am
114307
... power ... do ... So to make sure I have this right, the situation is that Russia calls an Axis Allied Rumania late in the war (Winter 1943 in this case). ...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
5:05 am
114308
... Unless Russia is purposely choosing a lesser result, the -2 and -3 results should be "Rumania switches sides" (with all that entails) instead of "Rumania...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
5:35 am
Messages 114279 - 114308 of 119755   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help