Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 113893 - 113922 of 119758   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
113893
... to implement (and nothing else). Note the ratio of German conquests/minors to base will be 2:1, not 3:1, which makes a considerable difference while...
balzak88
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
12:20 pm
113894
This is a typically negative post from you. What you term "screwing Germany" I view as "not giving Germany an artificial free ride based on an unrealistically...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
3:04 pm
113895
... Germany" I view as "not giving Germany an artificial free ride based on an unrealistically high BRP base/UCL level which in real life couldn't have been...
balzak88
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
4:59 pm
113896
One objection I have to this is that it introduces a mini-YSS for Germany at the end of each turn, especially in 1944-45. Perhaps you could prpose sometihng to...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
11:21 pm
113897
Seriously? It is already painless. First of all, the German BRP base may not be unduly constrained by the German conquests/minors (i.e., there may be a lot of...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
12:06 am
113898
Hi Can sea transport be made with DDs from any mapboard box to load unit in any port and debark to another port from the same front? Examples. 1- DDs Based on...
luismiguelgarcia2002
luismiguelga...
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
1:06 am
113899
Germany doesn't offset oil. Does that mean no more submarine warfare? 25.721 German submarines in the Atlantic SW box may not be used for SW if the Axis do not...
elihu_feustel
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
1:19 am
113900
For India and Australia the distance off map is given to the pacific map board so yes you could do the sea transport as long as it does not exceed 20 hexes in...
Moodey, William
wmoodey
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
1:21 am
113901
Not as I remember it. They can uninvert for free, but not operate sw. Maybe you mixed the two. Bill ________________________________ From:...
Moodey, William
wmoodey
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
1:23 am
113902
Speaking of Sea Transport ... It appears you can sea transport: - from the South Africa box to Suez, Basra or Abadan or sea transport: - from Suez, Basra or...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
1:58 am
113903
No, I wasn't joking. Yes, it is a pain. It's one more calculation and we have many already. So it reduces ease of play. Mike. ... From: Bruce Harper To:...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
3:11 am
113904
Because it isn't in the rules, I always assumed you couldn't, although I agree, it would seem natural enough to allow it. Mike. ... From: donmoody@... ...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
3:15 am
113905
I thought it used to be allowed, as you did, at reduced effectiveness. But it is not in the current rules, so I would agree that if you take the naval oil...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
3:19 am
113906
I think this objection is beyond silly, to be honest. No additional calculations are required. And the Allied players will have an hour to make one...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
3:27 am
113907
Germany rolls a result of 11 for rockets, allowing up to six rocket bases to be placed. How many may be placed each turn? We have: 42.24E E. ROCKET BASES:...
jerry.ingersoll
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
6:11 am
113908
"Successive" refers to the way in which advanced technology research results are implemented - gradually. It also refers to the fact that you could roll for...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
9:02 am
113909
I also thought the rule was just that there is a -1 mod (due to decreased NRDM from the oil effect), but don't know where that rule would be.   Don ... From:...
Don Stanley
schtean22
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
4:33 pm
113910
There used to be a -2 for SW, but I think we finally concluded that if the Germans don't offset the naval oil effect, they simply can't do submarine warfare. ...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
4:59 pm
113911
We discussed these possible rule changes at the convention: 1. Sacrificing Japanese BRP base to uninvert units 2. Uninverting countered air in the Japanese...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
5:22 pm
113912
Thanks, Mike. ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
Jerry Ingersoll
jerry.ingersoll
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
5:31 pm
113913
I think we forgot. This was a good idea. We put in this rule: Consistency (August 31, 2008) 33.76 EXEMPTIONS FROM UNINVERSION LIMITS: Air and naval units in...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
5:51 pm
113914
So... does this Japanese "NAS or kamikaze equivalent" round up to one full factor (like use of one or two NAS or AAS for search or similar actions) or round...
Dave Hanson
dchanson45
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
6:53 pm
113915
There is no rounding with uninversion. Burn no base, uninvert nothing. Burn 1 BRP of base, uninvert up to 1 AAF or 3 NAS/kamikazes. Burn 2 BRPs of base,...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
7:23 pm
113916
Yes - it's just like paying for NAS in a limited offensive. I don't think everything in the game is complicated... ... From: donmoody@... To:...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
8:02 pm
113917
maybe I am missing something, but why do kamikaze's need to be included in this rule? By 17.45 they are initially always uninverted, they remain offboard so...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
10:00 pm
113918
If rockets are implemented "TWO RESULTS PER TURN", it seems to me that bases should be placeable at a rate of at least two per turn. Or, if "successive" means...
crooktooth
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
4:42 am
113919
... Turn? ... recycle an ... Table, ... during ... Remember, there are rocket bases and flying bomb bases. You can place one of each each turn....
elihu_feustel
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
5:30 am
113920
Greetings! This monthly information message for the "A World At War" mailing lists explains the: QUESTION & ANSWER PROTOCOL How do I ask a question? a. Check...
aworldatwar@yahoogrou...
Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
9:28 am
113921
... That is my understanding as well. Ed...
Ed Schoenfeld
ejschoenfeld
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
1:12 pm
113922
It makes sense to me, but the rules aren't crystal clear. Also, how do you tell which base is which kind? Mike. ... From: Ed Schoenfeld To:...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
2:29 pm
Messages 113893 - 113922 of 119758   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help