On 30 Apr 2008/21:37, Tim Schroeder gave me the pleasure of reading ([aworldatwar] Re: ... I am not sure about this. Not complaining or rejecting, just giving...
On 30 Apr 2008/21:04, Tim Schroeder gave me the pleasure of reading ([aworldatwar] Re: ... Isn't this precisely what Bruce is after - reduce the power of a 10...
On 30 Apr 2008/21:51, Tim Schroeder gave me the pleasure of reading ([aworldatwar] Re: ... To a certain degree - you still have to be wary of being walked over...
On 30 Apr 2008/20:17, Chris Goldfarb gave me the pleasure of reading (RE: [aworldatwar] ... Let me hazard a guess what happened: - at South Bend, Bill Moodey...
Bruce ... Maurice M made a suggestion re a (hopefully) cheat proof Japanese resistance modofier that I and Don M like... or something similar (see accompanying...
Bruce One other potential idea re Japanese victory conditions/resistance level might be something along the line of the once upon a time (A3R) German victory...
111143
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 12:47 pm
Except for the fact that there was no mega-battle, that's actually a pretty accurate description! ... From: Markus Kässbohrer To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com ...
I have been very busy this week. I am working on a write up of our game. My pacific strategy was very conservative. But my overall Japanese strategy was...
111145
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 1:26 pm
A good and fair summary. One of the American carriers was sunk in port, so it was eventually repaired. The other American carriers had to defend against the...
111146
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 1:31 pm
After a brief off-line discussion with Eric, Don, Randy and Tim, here is a proposed "cheat-proof resistance modifier". It is a form of the proposal from...
111147
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 1:54 pm
Of all the other Pacific (and global) changes suggested, I think we might be able to confine ourselves to these: 1. Japanese oil: - Japan starts with 6 oil,...
Do you still want to limit where the British airbase can go? Mike. ... From: Bruce Harper To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 9:53 AM...
111149
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 2:29 pm
I do, but people were complaining about that. I thought that if we did, then the US should get four airbases (in each theater, although really it's the...
... did, then the US should get four airbases (in each theater, although really it's the placement rate that is important). ... British Airbase should stay on...
111151
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 2:36 pm
Any change to the number of American airbases needed? I would think the US would need more than 3. ... From: bbrophy75 To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent:...
Bruce:: If I could, I would start a Pacific game immediately to see how these work out. The effects will been seen quickly. Volunteers? These are changes I ...
I have not kept track of the of the plethora of emails on the pacific issues. Are the file rules package delayed now? How will this delay the second...
Agreed. U.S. should have at least four airbase counters to start, if the Allies can no longer employ the British/Australian airbase (as I'm doing in the game...
... the US would need more than 3. Sorry, I was only commenting on the British airbase change. Yes, give the US 4 airbases per theater. Bbo...
111157
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 3:05 pm
Because it allows the Allies to place airbases too quickly wear it counts. ... From: Dave Hanson To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008...
... work ... changes I ... I am actually 1 turn away from the intital Japanese DoW in one of my PbEM games. I will suggest to my opponent we use the proposed...
111159
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 3:05 pm
The second printing will not take place until: 1. GMT puts it on the P500 list. 2. There are enough orders. I don't think this will delay anything - the main...
I like 1-3 below. I will inquire of my current opponents as to whether or not they'd like to incorporate these modifications in our ongoing games. I do not...
111161
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 3:07 pm
The two go together, don't they? ... From: bbrophy75 To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 8:04 AM Subject: [aworldatwar] Re: Other...
111162
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 3:07 pm
Yes - you have it. At the end of each game turn, when Japanese resistance is always determined (I checked - that was clearly stated in the proposal). ... ...
111163
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 3:08 pm
None of this would affect pre-war planning, so that would work. The naval damage rules could be tried out in a European game too. ... From: bbrophy75 To:...
... Well, I think this: ... would be difficult to 'replay any time' and I'd like to hear about it (or was Japanese raiders killing IO transports and thus...
111165
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 3:10 pm
How many times do I have to ask people to change the subject line?? 1) All interceptions are announced simultaneously, as now. You just resolve them...
111166
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
May 1, 2008 3:11 pm
Europe was a disaster and all the units had to go there. It's meaningless. ... From: donmoody@... To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May...
