Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 110354 - 110383 of 119726   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
110354
This will be applicable to all forces? 1. Transports 2. Sea Supply line 3. DD's carrying Supply 4. DD's carrying Units [Sea Transport] 5. DD's carrying units...
Eric Scheulin
scheulingames
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
8:26 am
110355
Well, this really doesn't change anything. After a naval activity, all units can leave a SW box and return to a port within 20/10 hexes. I don't see why...
Eric Scheulin
scheulingames
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
8:30 am
110356
4 hexes from a patrol would be a lot different. Then the patrol counldn't help... Eric S. ... hexes away. ... get at an invading force and a patrol which is...
Eric Scheulin
scheulingames
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
8:33 am
110357
... non- ... question, ... as ... invasions, ... counts as ... combat. As ... invasions. ... factors ... units, ... until ... the ... in ... unit ... x3 ... is...
Bruce Wallace
bdwallace100
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
11:00 am
110358
2003?? I am duly impressed at your memory! I, however, have long since forgotten this, or this detail, and have never played that way. Since Japan usually...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
1:06 pm
110359
I don't know what this fight is about. I will get to it when some others are resolved. ... From: Mike Crowe To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday,...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
1:34 pm
110360
That's what I was thinking. Once you know what is participating in the first round, the playing with cargo can merge the cargo with another CG, provided the...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
1:41 pm
110361
Naval units in a SW box cannot CI, and I agree that it is okay that they can't. Randy ... the first round, the playing with cargo can merge the cargo with ...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
2:15 pm
110362
So when you look at the Atlantic map, both Scapa Flow and Glascow are 7 hexes from the north-western edge of the mapboard. Belfast is six hexes. You would...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
2:59 pm
110363
... since forgotten this, or this detail, and have never played that way. Don is correct and is not the only person who remembers when and why the change was...
Ed Schoenfeld
ejschoenfeld
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
4:10 pm
110364
Japan "usually" mobilizes in Spring 1940? For me--maybe once in awhile, when I'm looking to expand Japan's navy prewar. But certainly not all the time. ...
Dave Hanson
dchanson45
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
4:34 pm
110365
... What about off map movement? Can't an intercepting force go off the map and intercept there? DonMoody 21.217 OFF-BOARD MOVEMENT: Naval units may not move...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
4:42 pm
110366
Wasn't the whole point of placing ships in the sw box to allow protection of multiple naval missions like supply and sr? Is that enough of a mechanism to...
victor hogen
braindama
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
5:56 pm
110367
This would be fine with me. Before round 1 only, after forming combat groups as the rules now describe, a player would have the opportunity to merge each...
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
6:00 pm
110368
Dear group, Forgive my naive approach. Task forces trained and sailed together. The Japanese never even defended their supply line until late in the war. TF...
braindama
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
6:18 pm
110369
I will post again, units in a SW box cannot protect onboard missions, such as sea supply lines from Britain to Gib and med. ports etc. They can only protect...
Maurice Miskow
mmiskow
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
6:22 pm
110370
... I was also arguing for no change in this area (i.e. no change from the rules as they were at the end of last year). But if there is to be a change - and it...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
6:36 pm
110371
This question has come up a number of times, dating back to 2005. Even if some people find the rule clear, some others do not. Here's my attempt to summarize:...
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
6:42 pm
110372
... I think this is reasonable; i.e. an attack on an FNA colony removes the deployment restrictions for all other FNA colonies. ... I think this is too much. ...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
6:44 pm
110373
... Understood. Hopefully everyone knows that. While it doesn't really matter given the direction it looks like we are going, why does it matter? While units...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
6:46 pm
110374
I apologize for my noob comments again. I did not know that transports were not included in TF size. I also remember, maybe from long ago, that SW ships...
victor hogen
braindama
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
6:46 pm
110375
... Below is what I think is the simplest way to resolve this: No change to 18.614. Reword 18.611 as follows (incorporate parts of 18.611A into the main body ...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
7:15 pm
110376
On 1 Apr 2008/18:45, Randy Scheers gave me the pleasure of reading ([aworldatwar] Re: ... It tends to happen moderately frequently when Britain is under...
Markus Kässbohrer
markus9k
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
8:02 pm
110377
On 1 Apr 2008/9:30, Dave Hanson gave me the pleasure of reading ([aworldatwar] In which ... Besides, he knows how to use the forum's search function... -- -...
Markus Kässbohrer
markus9k
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
8:05 pm
110378
Comments below (>>>). ... From: Ed Schoenfeld To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:08 PM Subject: [aworldatwar] Re: Request for...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
10:00 pm
110379
On 31 Mar 2008/18:47, Maurice Miskow gave me the pleasure of reading (Re: [aworldatwar] ... Axis air counterairing the Brits in 1941 is not in Russia -...
Markus Kässbohrer
markus9k
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2008
10:25 pm
110380
It's not much of a change - lightly defended activities would be treated in the same manner as undefended activities. ... From: victor hogen To:...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 2, 2008
1:37 am
110381
I think when Vic writes "CI" he means "interception" (not "counter-interception" (CI), which is done by the moving player in repsonse to interception. I agree...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 2, 2008
1:41 am
110382
Mike - could explain to me what the confusion is? I'll make sure rule 51 states the actual rule clearly. ... From: Mike Crowe To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com ...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 2, 2008
1:56 am
110383
No. This can only happen when intercepting a naval force which was on the mapboard, moved off it, then moved back on. "Sea supply lines and naval units...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Apr 2, 2008
1:57 am
Messages 110354 - 110383 of 119726   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help