Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 109626 - 109655 of 119699   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
109626
Ed, I'll take your word for it. The distinction between a TF and a combat group seems odd, but it doesn't appear to make any practical difference. Thanks,...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2008
1:39 am
109627
I apologize is this question has already been asked and answered, but I was wondering if after a GB surrender/US separate peace if the US can STILL grant...
Ian Wylie
iwylie2002
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2008
3:38 am
109628
... The US must be at war with Germany to grante BRPs to Russia. I think the rule you need is: 40.333 POST-ELECTION GRANTS: An election result of -6 or below...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2008
6:43 am
109629
THANK-YOU Randy! It was silly of me to miss that later rule. Please forgive the additional follow-on question. Can I assume that the restriction on BRP...
Ian Wylie
iwylie2002
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2008
2:20 pm
109630
... Yes. Shipping an oil counter is the same as shipping 10 BRPs. If you can't ship 10 BRPs, you can't ship an oil counter. I have to admit that if Germany...
Randy Scheers
RScheers
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2008
2:54 am
109631
Hi SItuation Axis make attrition 51+ in the west front against allies forces. At the start of the axis player turn, all was a single att zone However, one...
luismiguelgarcia2002
luismiguelga...
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2008
4:16 pm
109632
No, unless you have a very strange situation! From what you describe, the Allies are in France in force, with one armored unit that you surrounded. So all...
crowemike@...
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2008
5:31 pm
109633
Dear all, Peter Bäckgren (Eskimo) is not on the list, but have the following question. In Summer-41 the Axis invade U41 and place a bridgehead (BH) there. In ...
Jan-Erik Wahlund
jewahlund
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2008
10:46 pm
109634
... Correct. (That air-range is operational range of army air factors and is not modified by air-range results.) ... Such future events have no effect, when...
vuorinem
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2008
11:33 pm
109635
The bridgehead is removed. DonMoody...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2008
12:43 am
109636
It seems to me you can argue that removal of the bridgehead worsens the supply situation, in general. Also, I don't think you should be forced to remove a...
Mike Crowe
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2008
1:15 pm
109637
... 1) Removal of a BH in the turn of placement is common; e.g. most invasions of small islands - and any invasion of a one hex island - will result in removal...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2008
2:11 pm
109638
Were these rules finalized? Also, will the final revisions make it to the AWorldAtWar.com site? The South Bend minicon is rapidly approaching, and the players...
elihu_feustel
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2008
8:17 pm
109639
Don, You're trying a little too hard. I know you don't agree with me, and I know I don't agree with you. It's ok. Mike. From: donmoody@... Date:...
crowemike@...
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2008
10:05 pm
109640
I think Dons point is that the rules are pretty clear that the BH is removed. You argument seems to be more that you think it should say that it should take...
Moodey, William
wmoodey
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2008
10:21 pm
109641
I asked this same question (about a bridgehead in N. Turkey) about a month or two ago. Several people answered just as Don has this time. Bruce Wallace ... ...
Bruce Wallace
bdwallace100
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
3:14 am
109642
Bill, Well, I never would have interpreted the rule to say that you should remove a bridgehead in the turn of placement. Automatically removing them from one...
crowemike@...
crowe_mike
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
3:30 am
109643
I think both Peter and me agree with Mike, as well as Don. The current rule is rather clear except possibly for the "worsen the supply situation (31.4).",...
Jan-Erik Wahlund
jewahlund
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
9:43 am
109644
I've never found this rule difficult to interpret and it has been like this for a long time, so someone would have to come up with a better formulation. Keep...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
3:45 pm
109645
Jan-Erik Wahlund wrote ... FWIW, overstacking is not a supply issue, so is not a factor in applying 31.41C: 31.41 REMOVAL COMPULSORY: A bridgehead counter must...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
3:58 pm
109646
... like this for a long time, so someone would have to come up with a better formulation. Agreed ... counters (I think) and they were limited in number,...
Ed Schoenfeld
ejschoenfeld
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
6:01 pm
109647
On 7 Mar 2008/10:49, Jan-Erik Wahlund gave me the pleasure of reading (Re: ... Which errors? I am smiling about your progress both in understanding the game...
Markus Kässbohrer
markus9k
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
6:52 pm
109648
On 7 Mar 2008/18:01, Ed Schoenfeld gave me the pleasure of reading ([aworldatwar] Re: ... Precisely. Note that removal occurs at the end of the owning player's...
Markus Kässbohrer
markus9k
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
6:52 pm
109649
... This seems odd (to say the least). I suggest this (from the official player turn SoP): 11. Voluntary elimination of units. 12. Uninvert air and naval...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
7:08 pm
109650
I have been struggling with this game off and on trying to get the rules down. However, it sure seems to me that a simplified version of the rules could be put...
Sean Cruz
cruz_sean
Online Now Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
7:23 pm
109651
On 7 Mar 2008/13:08, donmoody@... gave me the pleasure of reading ... Why change the rules? -- - Markus K. M@......
Markus Kässbohrer
markus9k
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
7:31 pm
109652
... Did you mean this rule: 12.21 Stacking limits may not be voluntarily exceeded other than as specifically permitted by the rules. Since the rules do not...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
7:43 pm
109653
Hello Sean Short answer to your question: No, not really. But some decent shortcuts exist. For example, the Sequence of Play guides you in knowing where each...
Dave Hanson
dchanson45
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
7:48 pm
109654
... This isn't allowed, according to 31.52 EFFECTS OF BRIDGEHEAD REMOVAL: Any ground units overstacked at the end of the owner's player turn as a result of the...
Tim Schroeder
nt2peter3
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
7:48 pm
109655
Dang, that would havebeen helpful. Well thanks for the tips, I got barbarossa with air and ground combat down well but am now working on getting the naval...
Sean Cruz
cruz_sean
Online Now Send Email
Mar 7, 2008
7:52 pm
Messages 109626 - 109655 of 119699   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help