Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aworldatwar · Forum for GMT's "A World At War"
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 103017 - 103046 of 119726   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
103017
Bruce I found missing numbers of Planes - HMS Formidable and Victorious 36 but in 1945 it raised to 54, Glorious 48. ... lack of resources. The fleet air arm...
krisdziku
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
7:34 am
103018
And one more thing to ask. If these rules will be changed and the Britain will lost chance to strike Italy with CVL task force. Then maybe free harbour attack...
krisdziku
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
8:18 am
103019
Based on the feedback from the list, especially Tim Francis confirming the history, I propose the following: 1. A maximum of four fast carriers per TF. This...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
2:38 pm
103020
Actually, as change goes, this one is OK. I can accept this package without complaining too much (I'm sure you'll be happy about that) :- ). I do have one...
gbangs34
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
2:55 pm
103021
... Historically, from 1 July 1940 through 31 August 1945, the US built 27 CVs & CVLs (IIRC, 17 and 10 respectively). Historically, the US considered other...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:01 pm
103022
... When did the German or Italian navy ever face 4 CVLs? The EuroAxis navies *routinely* avoided almost every situation where they might face British carriers...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:06 pm
103023
... where they ... OK, let me rephrase, changes in CAPS...IN THEORY facing 4 CVLs for Germany/Italy in the real war WOULD HAVE BEEN very scary. The Italians...
gbangs34
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:15 pm
103024
I try not to let my happiness depend too much on what is posted on the AWAW list... With respect to fast carrier strikes, one could just say that surprise...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:17 pm
103025
... Never. ... they ... The Italian navy routinely avoided almost every situation where they might face **one** British carrier without land based air support....
bbrophy75
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:21 pm
103026
... confirming the history, I propose the following: <snip> I do not like this proposed changed. It is suggested that British carriers are ahistorically used...
bbrophy75
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:27 pm
103027
It's disingenous to refer to the "EuroAxis navies", because Germany didn't really have one. The Germans were outnumbered and had to rely on LBA to engage the...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:34 pm
103028
You think the Furious could have sunk the Yamato, so I find it hard to credit your views on this subject. ... From: bbrophy75 To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com ...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:44 pm
103029
... I don't think that is what is being said. I think what is beign said is: Historically, the italians avoided the chance of confrontation with British...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:50 pm
103030
I heard from Tim Francis on this subject (for those who don't know, Tim is a naval historian and knows this subject). Based on his feedback: 1. A maximum of...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:53 pm
103031
... I think it is disingenuous to completely discount the concern the Italian (and German) navies had for british CVLs - a concern which cannot be recreated...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
3:54 pm
103032
... to credit your views on this subject. I think in 1945 the airwing of Furious could have sunk Yamato yes. You have yet to show me why I should believe...
bbrophy75
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:03 pm
103033
A few British Carriers sunk/damaged by Axis submarines. If you want that historical accuracy, give germany 1/2 tactical subs that do not subtract from there...
Jim Sparks
sparky0565
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:15 pm
103034
Apart from the Don/Bob postings (which are from the same play group and which really represent a single view), what do other people think? Don thinks that the...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:16 pm
103035
We're talking about the effectiveness of 1939-1942 British CVLs. And I have already pointed out that a single NAS can sink a BB5 by getting a successful...
Bruce Harper
bruce54321@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:19 pm
103036
The book is *American & British Aircraft Carrier Development, 1919-1941* by Thomas C. Hone, Norman Friedman & Mark D. Mandeles (Naval Institute Press, 1999). ...
mcrowe@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:22 pm
103037
An interesting package. It certainly gives players a reason to build CVBs, something I have never bothered with. The twist of denying a slow CG a search...
mcrowe@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:30 pm
103038
After all the 'sound and fury', once again Bruce distills the raw List input and his own wisdom into an elegant and fairly simple package that addresses the...
Dave Hanson
dchanson45
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:34 pm
103039
Hi I saw that rules will change and only half of the CVLs will be for bombers and half fighters. I't important at least to me clarify if all CVL's crew be able...
luismiguelgarcia2002
luismiguelga...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:39 pm
103040
I belive that the only change that I would agree is to limit the CAP to one third rounded up for each Carrier, despite of the total ammount of CVs in any TF. ...
luismiguelgarcia2002
luismiguelga...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:56 pm
103041
I would not mind bumping 1 nas to the 3-4 FF table. It makes CVLs even more vulnerable to a single nas, as it's primary effect. It does throw a bone to the...
mcrowe@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
4:59 pm
103042
It might tempt me to build Japanese CVBs Jim Sparks Jr ... From: "mcrowe@..." <mcrowe@...> To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com Cc: Bruce Harper...
Jim Sparks
sparky0565
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
5:01 pm
103043
About U.S. Navy late-war "carrier composition." I agree with Don that current balance between build time and cost is probably right. I don't believe that...
Dave Hanson
dchanson45
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
5:07 pm
103044
... and which really represent a single view), what do other people think? ... I think the package will have a good chance of accomplishing what you intend....
gbangs34
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
5:51 pm
103045
In Winter 1941, UK sends 2 CVLs to the Indian Ocean. I have always assumed 4 NAS must also go with it, but this is not stated. Must UK also send NAS with the...
elihu_feustel
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
6:27 pm
103046
... By the time the Yamato participated in Pacific events (i.e. 1942) - and certainly by the time the Yamato was sunk (i.e. 1945) - the airwing of any British...
donmoody@...
donmoody_pro...
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2007
6:38 pm
Messages 103017 - 103046 of 119726   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help