Dear Gerard,

My yahoo address is levsha71@....

Best,

Vlad

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerard Gillespie <gjgillespie@...>
To: ageofconquest@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:29:56 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [ageofconquest] Re: Value of Seige Equipment

>
> Dear vlad I cannot reply to your emails your box is bouncing. something is blocking your mail. please youse your yahoo address for now so that i can reply.
> yours respectfully,
> gerard
>
>
> --- On Sat, 9/27/08, Vladislav Novikov <vlad71tula@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Vladislav Novikov <vlad71tula@...>
> > Subject: Re[2]: [ageofconquest] Re: Value of Seige Equipment
> > To: ageofconquest@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008, 3:19 AM
> > A lot depends on the number of defenders. If an attacker
> > outnumber a defender more than twice as much in CP and HP no
> > walls will save a city (even 10th level ones).
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Vlad
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cwlinsj <cwlinsj@...>
> > To: ageofconquest@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
> > Subject: Re: [ageofconquest] Re: Value of Seige Equipment
> >
> > > I have seen strong armies lacking in artillery
> > completely destroyed when going up against strong
> > fortifications.  When going after heavily built-up cities,
> > invest in some arty.
> > >
> > > --- On Fri, 9/26/08, denis_podlipsky
> > <denis_podlipsky@...> wrote:
> > > From: denis_podlipsky
> > <denis_podlipsky@...>
> > > Subject: [ageofconquest] Re: Value of Seige Equipment
> > > To: ageofconquest@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Friday, September 26, 2008, 11:38 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >    
> > >            
> > >
> > > In Ancient scenario (unlike Medieval one) investment
> > into both siege
> > >
> > > machies and higher citadel walls worth spending gold.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, you can take a city without catapults or
> > ballista, but usually the
> > >
> > > casualties are tremendous in this case. So both siege
> > equipment and
> > >
> > > forts of higher levels help you minimize the losses
> > greatly, the former
> > >
> > > for attackers and the latter for defenders...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Denizzz
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In ageofconquest@ yahoogroups. com, "Greg
> > Stafford" <glorantha1@ ...>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > I'd like to query opinions on the relative
> > value of siege equipment.
> > >
> > > > The fortresses give a pretty heft bonus,
> > especially up at the higher
> > >
> > > > levels, but in private some individuals have told
> > me they don't think
> > >
> > > > the investment is worth it.
> > >
> > > > What's your opinion?
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >      
> > >
> > >    
> > >    
> > >    
> > >    
> > >    
> > >    
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >    
> > >
> > >
> > >    
> > >    
> > >
> > >
> > >      
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>      
>
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ageofconquest/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ageofconquest/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:ageofconquest-digest@yahoogroups.com
    mailto:ageofconquest-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ageofconquest-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/