Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
RF2support · RF2 support group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1964 - 1993 of 2251   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1964
In a situation where a battery of gun-howitzers like 25-pdrs was at the max of its direct fire range and needed a 6 to hit could the player choose to fire...
pauldouglas88
Offline Send Email
Oct 6, 2008
9:15 am
1965
If I remember the accounts of gun-howitzers fireing correctly - they are used to fireing IDF HE. They would, could and did fire over open sights (HE and AP),...
John Hadley
johnhadl99
Offline Send Email
Oct 6, 2008
2:20 pm
1966
Good question! My two cents is that things are slightly skewed by the time scale with each turn being approximately 15 minutes. In reality a battery would...
marc33594
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2008
11:18 am
1967
The point being made is that because of the range band hit scores, IDF has a greater chance of a hit at extreme DF ranges and beyond which seems odd. One would...
pauldouglas88
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2008
2:53 pm
1968
We are wargamers. Band 6 and target moving you need a 7 on a D6. IDF you need above a 1 on a D6 for comms and then a 6 on a D6 for the first gun - then a 5 or...
John Hadley
johnhadl99
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2008
6:19 pm
1969
I think that if a gun (or mortar) crew wishes to fire on a target which they can see from the gun position, they can choose to use either the Direct or...
Glenn I Simpson
g1enn_s1mpson
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2008
4:57 am
1970
Think, overall, it is a bit clearer with AFVs, whether closed or open top. Direct fire HE is not, as pointed out, allowed. Since 8.85 goes on to clearly...
marc33594
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2008
11:23 am
1971
Good post, Glen. I would agree with you to have a free choice over the matter of fire where this is allowable. Paul ... (I ... gun ... see ... see? ... AFVs ...
pauldouglas88
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2008
11:39 am
1972
I think this is the definative answer! Nice one. Why couldn't I have been so clear and well reasoned? John Hadley ... (I ... gun ... see ... see? ... AFVs ......
John Hadley
johnhadl99
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2008
1:39 pm
1973
Sounds good to me to and is also realistic - gunners will obviously choose the most effective form of fire to damage a target - direct fire is straight hit or...
stephen288341
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2008
8:22 am
1974
Some bits that might be of interest...... http://shop.ebay.co.uk/merchant/grille1946_W0QQ_nkwZQQ_armrsZ1QQ_fromZQQ_mdoZ ...
john dowman
mausman1947
Offline Send Email
Oct 14, 2008
8:40 pm
1975
Given a post 1943 British 25-pdr regt off-table will deploy 3 observers one per battery plus a chief observer at regt level. Will a battery observer normaly...
pauldouglas88
Offline Send Email
Oct 24, 2008
11:29 am
1976
Hi, the rules that seems to apply here are on page 62: 1. IDF is controlled by an OP (rule 8.66) 2. Each OP is normally attached to a specialist artillery...
markpiperau
Offline Send Email
Oct 26, 2008
6:38 am
1977
Thanks for that Mark. The link was very interesting too. I just wanted to clarify if I was doing things correctly in playtesting the Termoli scenario. The...
pauldouglas88
Offline Send Email
Oct 27, 2008
12:27 pm
1978
Paul, the "radio exchange" vehicle is a bit like the modern fire control centre and operates at the regimental HQ level for British (see the orbats). Look at...
markpiperau
Offline Send Email
Oct 27, 2008
9:02 pm
1979
Hi all, i have just joined. I thought I would introduce myself. I have a large collection covering most of the major protagonists, but mostly play German. Also...
mattboyd_uk
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2008
9:12 am
1980
Thanks again, Mark I think I've got it straight now. I originally thought the radio exchange vehicle was deployed only at regt level but got confused on how...
pauldouglas88
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2008
10:03 am
1981
Welcome aboard, fella. ... have ... mostly...
pauldouglas88
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2008
10:05 am
1982
Welcome Matt, BTW I have a RF website that might be of interest: www.worldoptions.com.au/fourpipers/rapid cheers Mark...
markpiperau
Offline Send Email
Oct 29, 2008
8:41 am
1983
... Thanks for that Mark, it looks to be a very interesting site ! matt...
mattboyd_uk
Offline Send Email
Oct 29, 2008
10:18 am
1984
Greetings from Spain! I'm the president of a Wargames Club, mostly based on Rapid Fire 2. So I think it's obligatory to join this great group, so I promise you...
Francisco Jos€ ¦é G€ ...
pacopepefores
Offline Send Email
Oct 29, 2008
12:15 pm
1985
... have ... mostly ... Welcome, Matt. Perhaps a bit off-topic, but I suffer from a growing interest in post- war wars. Which of the modern extensions of RF do...
Miquel PocovĂ­
alexioskomnenos
Offline Send Email
Oct 29, 2008
10:35 pm
1986
Welcome to the list, Paco. In my club, all german players (with only one honorable exception) are now playing FOW, and none of the RF2 Axis players wants to...
Miquel Pocoví
alexioskomnenos
Offline Send Email
Oct 29, 2008
10:53 pm
1987
Which of the modern extensions of RF do you use? ... Basically the "War in Peace" set by Rolf Hedges (liberation miniatures). They are not really a full set of...
mattboyd_uk
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2008
1:39 pm
1988
Can anyone help with this query: In our battle yesterday, two Shermans were side by side with about half an inch or so spacing between the models. One was...
flashingblade06
Offline Send Email
Oct 31, 2008
6:30 pm
1989
Hi, 1. the risk zone (page 51)is used for infantry targets only. When firing artillery (not MRLS) the individual vehicle is the target. In your example only...
markpiperau
Offline Send Email
Oct 31, 2008
10:08 pm
1990
Thank you Mark for your prompt reply to my questions. I will refer to your web site. Jim Hall ... From: markpiperau <mpipe4@...> Subject: [RF2support]...
James Hall
flashingblade06
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
7:55 am
1991
... But Doesn't this mean that troops riding on tanks have a higher chance of survival than ones actually inside dedicated halftracks, due to the heavier...
mattboyd_uk
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
1:45 pm
1992
Reading p.64 (8.85 -8.87) it seems the idea is that once any type of AFV is destroyed by a D6 roll of 6 then you should dice for casualties.  For tank riders...
James Hall
flashingblade06
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
3:58 pm
1993
My apologies to RF2 members who read my previous post and wondered what it was about. It should have been posted on another discussion group since it contained...
flashingblade06
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
8:20 am
Messages 1964 - 1993 of 2251   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help