Hi guys, just to prove photos works for me - have just added some photos from our Worthington Force game today to the photos area. Canadian victory with...
Hi all As I am interested in Early War period, I would like to know the opinion of the group about the penalty applied to french tanks. IMHO this penalty is...
hi de hi, Very new to the rules, but I would sort of agree with Miquel. Tanks with one man turrets -1 Tanks with stabilised guns +1 This reflects the increased...
I also have a French army but I think some significant penalty is justified for all tanks firing turret cannons with a one man turret crew (note the penalty...
I agree re the B1 bis, but not re stabilisers. The stabiliser used in US M4s during WW2 was early technology and not at all effective - they were often...
problem with the Char B is the driver being responsible for laying and aiming the gun, David Fletcher gives a good analysis of this on one of those Cromwell...
all good ideas but the pace of the game will suffer,..Glen did you see the pics of our game ?, on the KGK list, should I post them here as well? ... From:...
Yes, any additional rules will slow things down, but there must be some differences between armies if the historical flavour is to be achieved - it is a matter...
KGK list is our club list though any body can join..look for kampfgruppekendo http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/kampfgruppekendo/ ... From: Glenn I Simpson ...
I arrange a Stonne refight recently and the move and fire penalty was quite severe on the French. I'll try the additional -1 modification the next time we...
... were the main factor in WW2 tanks in obtaining early hits, and if you wanted to have a die roll modifier for good gunnery control you should give it to the...
All, have just uploaded the latest version of my Breaking the Panzers scenario: http://www.worldoptions.com.au/fourpipers/rapid/new.html Have removed old...
that looks like a great scenario... ... From: markpiperau To: RF2support@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:47 AM Subject: [RF2support]...
Quick question about the armour rating for the Char B. The french charts in the files section have a rating of 'C', yet the Pnz B 1 flamm on the German charts...
I've always had it as B it was well armoured for it's time, like the Matilda II. A sherman is C for heavens sake. Char B1 has to be better that that. ... Pnz B...
I agree that the one man turret should have a - 1 but please remember if a tank wished to hit a target it stopped the great films of t34's charging across the...
Now in the links area Wacca ... kampfgruppekendo ... be ... be ... and ... you ... here ... if ... you ... by ... know ... (probably ... substitute ... is ... ...
As the author of the French charts, I should explain my thinking on this one. True it is that the original RF rules classified the B1 bis as B class, but I...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the RF2support group. File : /Glenn's...
RF2support@yahoogroup...
Oct 7, 2007 11:26 pm
1452
Re the debate on Armour class for the B1 bis, I just realised that I had never posted my tank data file on this site - now I have, so at least we can have an...
Glenn, I agree with your conclusions, and your solution. The 37mm Pnz III in the RF charts is a 'D' with a class '5' gun gives the separation required for the...
I think there is a good argument for a Gun Class 0 (e.g. 128mm in JgdTiger, 88mm in Tiger II), and Armour Class X (e.g. Maus) for 1945 games. ... III ... ...
Ahh, but there is the rub! The point cost of the Tiger II and the Maus should also reflect their rarity. Except for a special scenario, based on a real...
Yes, I agree - that is why we play proper RF2 scenarios and not hypothetical games between absurd points-based forces like the Flames of War crew. One can try...
